NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

STRUCTURE Harvester results

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27302v1/supp-1

Demographic structure of Matteuccia struthiopteris population dataset

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27302v1/supp-3

Raw SEM-micrograph of Matteuccia struthiopteris spore with perispore

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27302v1/supp-4

Raw SEM-micrograph of Matteuccia struthiopteris spore without perispore

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27302v1/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Irina I Gureyeva conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Dmitriy S Feoktistov performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Alexander A Kuznetsov performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

File 1 shows the output obtained by analysing the results of STRUCTURE runs. The matrix of scored bands for all ISSR markers is shown in the file 2. The dataset for detect of demography structure of Matteuccia struthiopteris population is in file3. It shows the number of sporophytes that belongs to each ontogenetic group. File 4 and 5 show the raw SEM-micrographs of Matteuccia struthiopteris spores with perispore and without it.

Funding

This work was supported by the Tomsk State University competitiveness improvement program (TSU, Russia, No. 8.1.09.2018) and by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (No. 16-04-00513). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
2 Citations   Views   Downloads