NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Raw data of garter snakes in Central Mexico

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27205v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Erika Valencia-Flores performed the experiments, analyzed the data.

Crystian S Venegas-Barrera analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Victor Fajardo contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Javier Manjarrez conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This study received the approval of the ethics committee of the Universidad Autónoma

del Estado de México

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales # 07164

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw data are provided in the supplementary files 1 The raw data shows all snakes collected and transformed were used for statistical analysis to compare localities and species.

Funding

This study received funding resources of the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (Number 4047/2016SF). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads