NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Rita Castilho is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Teófilo Morim performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Grant R Bigg analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Pedro M Madeira performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jorge Palma authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, provided critical samples.

David D Duvernell authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, provided critical DNA aliquots.

Enric Gisbert authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, provided critical samples.

Regina L Cunha conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, approved the final draft.

Rita Castilho conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Samples from USA were in the form of DNA aliquots originated from samples caught for previously published study in 2008: (Duvernell D.D., Lindmeier J.B., Faust K.E., & Whitehead A. (2008) Relative influences of historical and contemporary forces shaping the distribution of genetic variation in the Atlantic killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus. Molecular Ecology, 17, 1344–1360. Guidelines posted by the American Society for Ichthyologists and Herpetologists were followed. In Iberia, Fundulus is an invasive species. The individuals used in this study from Ebro Delta originated from field activities of eradication carried out by the Natural Park, no permits were needed. Other samples did not required specific permissions.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

Genbank

MH809691 - MH809938

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

No raw data/code was produced.

Funding

RLC was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship (SFRH/BPD/109685/2015) from FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal) and FSE (Fundo Social Europeu). The work was funded by RC funds from FCT strategic plan UID/Multi/04326/2013 granted to CCMAR. North American sample collection was supported by NSF grant OCE-0221879 to DDD. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads