Visitors   Views   Downloads

Circadian disruption and divergent microbiota acquisition under extended photoperiod regimens in chicken

View preprint
37 days ago
Circadian disruption and divergent microbiota acquisition under extended photoperiod regimens in chicken https://t.co/hby4bugWoi
peerJ: Circadian disruption and divergent microbiota acquisition under extended photoperiod regimens in chicken https://t.co/WiHqrCnXNj
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplementary table containing OTU information from Mother analyses

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27120v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Anne-Sophie Charlotte Hieke performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Shawna Marie Hubert performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Giridhar Athrey conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Texas A&M University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee provided approval for this research (IACUC 2016-0064)

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

All the raw data for this study is deposited on Figshare (https://figshare.com/s/4cf16ca2dc28b1047455)

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw data will be available on Figshare

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies