NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Raw data table of the specimens collected including species names, their species code, trophic group and abundance per log of saproxylic Diptera community assembly in southern Quebec

SA = saprophagous, FU = fungivorous, PR = predator, PA = parasitic, PH = phytophagous, OM = omnivorous, YM = young maple, OM = old maple, YB = young beech, OB = old beech.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27034v1/supp-1

Map of Mont Saint-Hilaire Biosphere Reserve in Southern Quebec, Canada (45°32’40”N, 73°9’5”W)

Google maps; topo map: 31 H/11 1:50,000.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27034v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Julia Mlynarek conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Amélie Grégoire Taillefer analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Terry A Wheeler conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are provided in the supplementary Table 1. The data show all the Diptera species that have been identified in this study from fallen logs at different decay stages.

Funding

This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant to TAW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads