NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Manuscript that is Analysis of mitochondrial DNA data reveals non-monophyly in the bushbuck (Tragelaphus scriptus) complex under review elsewhere, but provided as supplementary material

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27011v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Andrinajoro R Rakotoarivelo conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Paul O'Donoghue contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft.

Michael W Bruford contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Yoshan Moodley conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

GenBank accession numbers would be made available once the manuscript is accepted.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

GenBank accession numbers would be made available as a supplemental table once the manuscript is accepted.

Funding

The University of Venda and the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) of the Republic of South Africa provided financial support for ARR. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads