Visitors   Views   Downloads

Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes

View preprint
RT @DoctorZen: Related: preprint from me about authorship disputes and the lack of ways to resolve them: https://t.co/u2kq2tYBio https://t.…
RT @DoctorZen: Related: preprint from me about authorship disputes and the lack of ways to resolve them: https://t.co/u2kq2tYBio https://t.…
RT @DoctorZen: Related: preprint from me about authorship disputes and the lack of ways to resolve them: https://t.co/u2kq2tYBio https://t.…
Related: preprint from me about authorship disputes and the lack of ways to resolve them: https://t.co/u2kq2tYBio https://t.co/viulIpTe4m
Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes https://t.co/BunQLJ7g7y
RT @RetractionWatch: “Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes,” says @DoctorZen in @PeerJ. https://t.co/O5z44S3Js3
There is an urgent need for an independent body that can offer binding arbitration for scientific collaborators and journals, like practices in other collaborative disciplines https://t.co/s2l38QPv7R
RT @RetractionWatch: “Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes,” says @DoctorZen in @PeerJ. https://t.co/O5z44S3Js3
63 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: “Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes,” says @DoctorZen in @PeerJ. https://t.co/O5z44S3Js3
RT @RetractionWatch: “Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes,” says @DoctorZen in @PeerJ. https://t.co/O5z44S3Js3
“Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes,” says @DoctorZen in @PeerJ. https://t.co/O5z44S3Js3
Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes! https://t.co/M1PrjdCzlK
RT @DoctorZen: When authorship dispute arises, usual advice is: "Sort it out among yourselves." Do trainees stand a fair chance? https://t.…
When authorship dispute arises, usual advice is: "Sort it out among yourselves." Do trainees stand a fair chance? https://t.co/vOpXd0WRen https://t.co/83xEbXH0Ni
RT @Protohedgehog: Interesting new article from @DoctorZen on solving authorship disputes. My view is that we still need to do away with jo…
Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes https://t.co/l9rCQ0fRHR
RT @DoctorZen: Authorship disputes are 100% predictable under current practices. We need better ways to solve them. My suggestions: https…
RT @Protohedgehog: Interesting new article from @DoctorZen on solving authorship disputes. My view is that we still need to do away with jo…
RT @Protohedgehog: Interesting new article from @DoctorZen on solving authorship disputes. My view is that we still need to do away with jo…
RT @Protohedgehog: Interesting new article from @DoctorZen on solving authorship disputes. My view is that we still need to do away with jo…
RT @Protohedgehog: Interesting new article from @DoctorZen on solving authorship disputes. My view is that we still need to do away with jo…
Interesting new article from @DoctorZen on solving authorship disputes. My view is that we still need to do away with journal articles altogether, and have more granular systems of authoring and sharing https://t.co/fjYOtHh4E1 HT @PeerJPreprints
RT @DoctorZen: Authorship disputes are 100% predictable under current practices. We need better ways to solve them. My suggestions: https…
RT @DoctorZen: Authorship disputes are 100% predictable under current practices. We need better ways to solve them. My suggestions: https…
Authorship disputes are 100% predictable under current practices. We need better ways to solve them. My suggestions: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb https://t.co/R6LKtnw8py
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Zen Faulkes conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code, because it is a commentary.

Funding

The author received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies