Visitors   Views   Downloads

Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes

View preprint
RT @DoctorZen: Stan Lee makes a cameo in my next academic paper on authorship disputes. Fights over the creation of comics characters can p…
Stan Lee makes a cameo in my next academic paper on authorship disputes. Fights over the creation of comics characters can provides lessons for scientists co-uathoring papers. Preprint: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb #RIPStanLee https://t.co/FGz3GN6kJn
RT @DoctorZen: Authorship disputes are going to get worse before they get better. We need better ways of resolving authorship dispute. Prep…
Authorship disputes are going to get worse before they get better. We need better ways of resolving authorship dispute. Preprint: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb Final paper out soon. https://t.co/zld2HlUKbH
@AlliePyLam There is a preprint, but the final version makes a more focused argument and has more data: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb
6 days ago
RT @DoctorZen: You can read a "not-as-good-as-the-final-version" preview of the author disputes paper at @PeerJPreprints: https://t.co/XlV3…
RT @DoctorZen: You can read a "not-as-good-as-the-final-version" preview of the author disputes paper at @PeerJPreprints: https://t.co/XlV3…
You can read a "not-as-good-as-the-final-version" preview of the author disputes paper at @PeerJPreprints: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb
RT @DoctorZen: Final FINAL acceptance on this paper on authorship disputes: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb Review the final version better than th…
RT @DoctorZen: Final FINAL acceptance on this paper on authorship disputes: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb Review the final version better than th…
Final FINAL acceptance on this paper on authorship disputes: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb Review the final version better than the preprint, though. Will be #OpenAccess!
RT @DoctorZen: Ugh. An example of why i have a paper (coming soon) about how corrosive the research community's attitude to authorship disp…
32 days ago
RT @DoctorZen: Ugh. An example of why i have a paper (coming soon) about how corrosive the research community's attitude to authorship disp…
RT @DoctorZen: Ugh. An example of why i have a paper (coming soon) about how corrosive the research community's attitude to authorship disp…
Ugh. An example of why i have a paper (coming soon) about how corrosive the research community's attitude to authorship disputes is. Preprint: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb https://t.co/rXOQwG8kIZ
Paper is significantly revised version of this at @PeerJPreprints: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb
Accepted paper is significantly revised version of this @peerj preprint: https://t.co/XlV3LRZlFb
RT @DoctorZen: Related: preprint from me about authorship disputes and the lack of ways to resolve them: https://t.co/u2kq2tYBio https://t.…
RT @DoctorZen: Related: preprint from me about authorship disputes and the lack of ways to resolve them: https://t.co/u2kq2tYBio https://t.…
RT @DoctorZen: Related: preprint from me about authorship disputes and the lack of ways to resolve them: https://t.co/u2kq2tYBio https://t.…
130 days ago
Related: preprint from me about authorship disputes and the lack of ways to resolve them: https://t.co/u2kq2tYBio https://t.co/viulIpTe4m
Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes https://t.co/BunQLJ7g7y
RT @RetractionWatch: “Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes,” says @DoctorZen in @PeerJ. https://t.co/O5z44S3Js3
There is an urgent need for an independent body that can offer binding arbitration for scientific collaborators and journals, like practices in other collaborative disciplines https://t.co/s2l38QPv7R
150 days ago
RT @RetractionWatch: “Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes,” says @DoctorZen in @PeerJ. https://t.co/O5z44S3Js3
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Zen Faulkes conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code, because it is a commentary.

Funding

The author received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies