NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

the overall sequencing quality showing the distribution and quality of acquired bases

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26946v2/supp-1

Community demography showing the abundance, coverage and height of both species

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26946v2/supp-2

t-test results of eight types of soil properties demonstrating the difference in the microhabitat

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26946v2/supp-3

Summary of results of enzyme digestion and mapping for each sampled individuals

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26946v2/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Yu Ning conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Gao-Jie Wu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Hua Ma performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Ju-Lan Guo performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Man-Yin Zhang analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Wei Li analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Yi-Fei Wang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Suo-Lang Duoerji performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data can be freely accessed at: https://figshare.com/articles/sequence_data_for_Kobresia_and_Blysmus/6226646

Funding

This work was supported by the National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant from CAFINT(No.CAFINT2015C11) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Nonprofit Research Institution of CAF(No.CAFYBB2017QA040). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads