Differences in persistence between dogs and wolves in an unsolvable task in the absence of humans
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Animal Behavior, Ecology
- Keywords
- Persistence, Dog-Wolf comparison, Behavioural variety, Comparative cognition, Problem-solving behaviour, Physical Cognition, Individual Consistency
- Copyright
- © 2018 Rao et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2018. Differences in persistence between dogs and wolves in an unsolvable task in the absence of humans. PeerJ Preprints 6:e26913v2 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26913v2
Abstract
Despite being closely related, dogs consistently perform worse than wolves in independent problem-solving tasks. These differences in problem-solving performance have been attributed to dogs’ greater reliance on humans, who are usually present when problem-solving tasks are presented. However, more fundamental motivational factors or behavioural traits such as persistence, behavioural variety and neophobia may also be responsible for differences in task performance. Hence, to better understand what drives dogs’ and wolves’ different problem-solving performance, it is essential to test them in the absence of humans. Here, we tested equally raised and kept dogs and wolves with two unsolvable tasks, a commonly used paradigm to study problem-solving behaviour in these species. Differently from previous studies, we ensured no humans were present in the testing situation. We also ensured that the task was unsolvable from the start which eliminated the possibility that specific manipulative behaviours was reinforced. This allowed us to measure both persistence and behavioural flexibility more accurately. In line with previous studies, we found wolves to be more persistent than dogs. We also found behavioural variety to be linked to persistence and persistence to be linked to contact latency. Finally, subjects were consistent in their performance between the two tasks. These results suggest that fundamental differences in motivation to interact with objects drive the performance of wolves and dogs in problem solving tasks. Since correlates of problem-solving success i.e. persistence, neophobia, and behavioural variety are influenced by species’ ecology, our results support the social ecology hypothesis which postulates that the different ecological niches of the two subspecies (dogs have evolved to primarily be scavengers and thrive on and around human refuse, while wolves have evolved to primarily be group hunters and have a low hunting success rate) at least partly shaped their behaviours.
Author Comment
1. Additional details about the subjects origins, raising and keeping have been added.
2. Subjects' manipulative behaviours have been re-evaluated and re-coded. The 21 originally coded manipulative behaviours have been combined into ten behaviours based on the number of body parts used in the behaviours.
3. The cluster analysis has been replaced by a PCA. Age has been factored into all GAMLSS models.
4. The analysis section has been completely rewritten to make it easier to read. More details about GAMLSS models have been included.5. A more thorough model validation procedure has been used and the supplementary material has been updated with information about the validation process.
Supplemental Information
Complete dataset with trial duration and frequencies of manipulative behaviours
Supplementary results and complete GAMLSS model information
R Scripts & Analyses Workspaces
This is an archive of the R scripts (and R Studio workspaces) used for all the analyses in this paper.
Supplementary Video (Ethogram)
This video is a compilation of examples the various manipulative behaviours that we coded.