NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplementary Figure 1: Staphopia database schema

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26890v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Timothy D Read is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Robert A Petit III conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Timothy D Read conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Results section analysis - https://github.com/staphopia/staphopia-paper

R Package - https://github.com/staphopia/staphopia-r

StAP - https://github.com/staphopia/staphopia-ap

Web Package - https://github.com/staphopia/staphopia-web

Docker Image - https://hub.docker.com/r/rpetit3/staphopia/

Funding

Funding was from Emory University, Amazon AWS in Education Grant Program, and NIH grants AI091827 and AI121860. The Seven Bridges Cancer Genomics Cloud has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Contract No. HHSN261201400008C and Task Order No. 17X146 under Contract No. HHSN261201500003I. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads