NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.
A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Nikolai M Adamski conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Philippa Borrill conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jemima Brinton conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Sophie Harrington conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Clemence Marchal conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Cristobal Uauy conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

This opinion article did not generate any data or code .

Funding

This works was supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Designing Future Wheat programme BB/P016855/1, International Wheat Yield Partnership (IWYP) grant IWYP76, BBSRC Future Leader Fellowship BB/M014045/1 to PB, and the John Innes Foundation (SH). CM was funded by a PhD studentship from Group Limagrain. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
3 Citations   Views   Downloads