NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Raw genotype data per locus and individual

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26742v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Leonardo P. Niero conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Mercival R. Francisco contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Bruno H. Saranholi analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Luis F. Silveira contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Pedro M. Galetti Jr conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade - Sisbio provided the approval (10013-1).

Funding

This work was supported by the Brazilian agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq (308385/2014-4 to PMGJ; 135693/2013-6 to LPN) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP (2013/24453-4 to BHS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads