Visitors   Views   Downloads

Towards computational reproducibility: researcher perspectives on the use and sharing of software

View preprint
20 days ago
New @PeerJPreprints "Towards computational reproducibility: researcher perspectives on the use and sharing of software" https://t.co/6DlKlmNGVT
Here's @yasmina_anwar and my preprint that describes this work in greater detail. https://t.co/VGty4Fd5ED
RT @JohnBorghi: Here’s the preprint! https://t.co/VGty4EVug3
RT @JohnBorghi: Here’s the preprint! https://t.co/VGty4EVug3
Here’s the preprint! https://t.co/VGty4EVug3
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Understanding researcher needs and values related to software questionnaire and consent form

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26727v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

We believe that there is no competing interest to this work.

Author Contributions

Yasmin Alnoamany conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

John A. Borghi conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

1) Dash

2) 10.6078/D1HM2W

3) https://doi.org/10.6078/D1HM2W

Funding

This work is supported in part by Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (#G-2015-14112 and #G-2014-13746) and the National Science Foundation NSF (ACI #1349002). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies