Visitors   Views   Downloads

Plurality in biomedical research: Multiple institutional affiliations are associated with improved research output

View preprint
Plurality in biomedical research: Multiple institutional affiliations are associated with improved research output https://t.co/VQ51KAjuWY #oaimpact
197 days ago
Plurality in biomedical research: Multiple institutional affiliations are associated with improved research output https://t.co/nPMhRfLVTU
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

R code used to perform analyses

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26654v1/supp-1

R code used to perform analyses

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26654v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Paul Sanfilippo conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Alex W Hewitt conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

David A Mackey conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The .rdata file containing the raw data used in this study is available here:

https://d.pr/f/emtXnT

Funding

The Centre for Eye Research Australia receives Operational Infrastructure Support from the Victorian Government. PGS and AWH are supported by NHMRC Fellowships. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies