NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Supplemental Information

The minimum spanning networks for vervet monkey (A) acrosin (ACR), (B) Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 and (C) TLR7

The size of each circle is in relation to the number of sequences analysed.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26577v1/supp-1

Sample list of 81 vervet monkeys sampled from across the vervet monkey distribution range for the current study

Locality information, group ID, no of troops per group, sex, sample ID and DNA amplification success for each gene fragment is provided.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26577v1/supp-2

Sample list of all outgroup taxa used during analyses, with the associated GenBank accession numbers

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26577v1/supp-3

Site-by-site results for selection obtained from six different selection analyses

Significance values (p-value/Bayes Factor/Posterior probability) are in bold. Candidate sites identified by at least two Datamonkey methods and/or PAML M8 model are highlighted in grey.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26577v1/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Willem G Coetzer conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Trudy R Turner contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft.

Christopher A Schmitt approved the final draft, significant contribution to sample and data collection.

J Paul Grobler conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Sampling and research ethical clearance was obtained for the original paper (Turner et al. 2016) from the Institutional Care and Use Committee of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, United States of America (Ref no. 07-08 #32) and the Inter-Faculty Animal Ethics Committee of the University of the Free State, South Africa (Ref no. UFS-AED13/2010). All samples from this study were sourced from the Turner et al. (2016) study and no new additional samples were included.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

All sequences generated are accessible via GenBank, accession numbers MG014710 - MG014719.

Funding

The study was funded by the University of the Free State Postdoctoral Fellowship Grant. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads