NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Chilling and forcing functions from Prevéy et al (2018)

These functions were used to calculate the chilling and forcing units accumulated from 11/2/2017 through reproductive budburst for red alder cuttings, and trees at Webster Nursery..

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26489v1/supp-1

Code used for analyses in manuscript. All code was run in the statistical program R (R Core Development Team 2017)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26489v1/supp-2

Raw data of dates of reproductive budburst for cuttings in all experimental treatments and trees at Webster Nursery

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26489v1/supp-3

Raw data for hourly temperatures for all experimental treatments and Webster Nursery

Temperature data were collected with Hobo pendant temperature dataloggers (Onset Corporation, Contoocook, NH). One datalogger was placed alongside cuttings in each treatment, under a conical shade structure, and one datalogger was hung in a red alder tree under a conical shade structure at Webster nursery.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26489v1/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Janet S. Prevéy conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Constance A. Harrington conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Funding

This work was supported by the USDI Bureau of Land Management and USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
2 Citations   Views   Downloads