How the US can best support the careers of promising young biomedical scientists
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Science and Medical Education, Science Policy
- Keywords
- Young faculty, Innovative science, high risk high reward research, new innovator award, ERC Starting Grant
- Copyright
- © 2018 Alberts et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2018. How the US can best support the careers of promising young biomedical scientists. PeerJ Preprints 6:e26465v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26465v1
Abstract
A vibrant American biomedical research enterprise requires a constant infusion of young scientists proposing and conducting important, innovative research. Demographic analyses indicate that the biomedical research workforce has been aging, with scientists launching independent academic laboratories much later in their lives than previously. In addition, those starting new laboratories encounter strong pressures discouraging novel, potentially groundbreaking research. These two factors represent a major threat to the vitality of biomedical research in the U.S. Based on recent analyses demonstrating the success of such programs, we propose that the NIH expand by ten-fold its use of the New Innovator award—an award available only to young scientists proposing innovative research. We argue that this action, accompanied by two related policy changes, would dramatically improve the U.S. biomedical research enterprise.
Author Comment
This is a preprint submission to PeerJ Preprints.