Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Figure S1: PROCHECK-generated Ramachandran plots

A) S. punctatus iTasser homology model and B) T. pacificus rhodopsin x-ray crystal structure (PDB ID: 2Z73).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2397v1/supp-1

Figure S2: 3D-1D averaged scores across the length of structures and models

A) the T. pacificus crystal structure, B) the S. punctatus homology model against the iTasser GPCR database, and C) the S. punctatus homology model against the sensory rhodopsin II xray crystal structure from the archaeon Natronomonas pharaonis (PDBid 1H68). Far more residues have averaged scores below 0 in the S. punctatus model using 1H68 as the template than in the other two structures.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2397v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Steven R Ahrendt conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Edgar Mauricio Medina conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Chia-en A Chang analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jason E Stajich conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

github

https://github.com/stajichlab/chytropsin

Funding

Jason E Stajich and Steven R Ahrendt were supported by funds from a grant from Alfred P. Sloan Foundation to J.ES., initial complement funds to J.E.S from the University of California-Riverside College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, and USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project CA-R-PPA-5062-H. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies