Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Sweetpotato raw data

Sweetpotato raw data

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2394v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Gurr serves as an Academic Editor for PeerJ. Gurr & Liu are married. Gurr, Kirchhof, Fujinuma and Sirabis are funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research to conduct research arising in part from the results presented herein.

Author Contributions

Geoff M Gurr conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jian Liu analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Anne C Johnson wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Deane N Woruba performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gunnar Kirchhof conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ryosuke Fujinuma conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

William Sirabis performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Yapo Jeffery performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ramakrishna Akkinapally conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file.

Funding

This work was supported as a 'Small Research Activity' by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (SMCN/2012/016). Gurr is supported by a Chinese Government Thousand Talents Program fellowship during which this manuscript was prepared. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies