Visitors   Views   Downloads

Randomised Badger Culling Trial: How big was the perturbation effect?

View preprint
RT @bovinetb: @SteveMcCVet @PhilLatham @RosieWoodroffe @terrierview @Mr_TBFree @DenLeonard @alicksimmons @GarethEnticott @Badgergate Gibben…
260 days ago
@SteveMcCVet @PhilLatham @RosieWoodroffe @terrierview @Mr_TBFree @DenLeonard @alicksimmons @GarethEnticott @Badgergate Gibbens said almost all evidence for perturbation comes from RBCT. Yet the bulk of those effects seen in the RBCT were due to large adjustments applied to the data. Applying those adjustments was not safe because of large confidence intervals in that data. https://t.co/OPIVkZfrRk
260 days ago
@terrierview @Mr_TBFree @DenLeonard @PhilLatham @alicksimmons @SteveMcCVet @GarethEnticott @Badgergate I say the perturbation effect exists & can reduce the benefit of culling. However the impact in RBCT adjoining lands was not readily visible. In my view the ISG should not have added dubious adjustments & then claim the effect was visible. https://t.co/OPIVkZfrRk
380 days ago
How dependent are these badger cull benefits on the applied adjustments? What are the TB levels in the absence of adjustments? https://t.co/0oUxgBehD3 "Evidence" for perturbation in the RBCT was largely dependent on adjustments for pre-cull history. https://t.co/OPIVkZfrRk
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

David Hendy analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate, collect or analyse any raw data or code.

Funding

The author received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies