NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Raw data of dung beetles collected in the study

Number of individuals of dung beetle species collected from each treatment of the two factors. For each treatment, inventory completeness was also reported according to the INext estimators. LG: low grazing; MG: moderate grazing; ECO: VMP-free; VMP: with the use of VMPs.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2358v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest

Author Contributions

Mattia Tonelli conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

José R. Verdú conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mario E. Zunino conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file

Funding

Financial support was partially provided by the Project CGL2015-68207-R of the Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación of the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain. Mattia Tonelli benefited for an Italian ministerial Ph.D scholarship The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads