Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Danilo Garcia conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Alexander Jimmefors performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Fariba Mousavi wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lillemor Adrianson wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Patricia Rosenberg wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Trevor Archer conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

According to law (2003: 460, §2) concerning the ethical research involving humans we arrived to the conclusion that the design of the present study (e.g., all participants’ data will not be used for commercial or other non-scientific purposes) required only informed consent from participants.

Grant Disclosures

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:

FORTE (Dnr. 2013-2923)

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

Researchgate

Funding

This research was supported by the Stiftelsen Kempe-Carlgrenska Fonden, AFA Insurance, and FORTE (Dnr. 2013-2923). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies