Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

The aspects of a Research Data Repository documented in the re3data.org vocabulary.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.21v1/supp-1

The re3data.org icon system.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.21v1/supp-2

The home page of the re3data.org search.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.21v1/supp-3

The hit list of a search.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.21v1/supp-4

A detailed description of a Research Data Repository.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.21v1/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

No competing interests.

Author Contributions

Heinz Pampel wrote the paper, conceived and implemented the registry.

Paul Vierkant wrote the paper, conceived and implemented the registry.

Frank Scholze wrote the paper, conceived and implemented the registry.

Roland Bertelmann wrote the paper, conceived and implemented the registry.

Maxi Kindling wrote the paper, conceived and implemented the registry.

Jens Klump wrote the paper, conceived and implemented the registry.

Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker wrote the paper, conceived and implemented the registry.

Jens Gundlach wrote the paper, conceived and implemented the registry.

Peter Schirmbacher wrote the paper, conceived and implemented the registry.

Uwe Dierolf wrote the paper, conceived and implemented the registry.

Funding

The writing of this paper was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies