Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Marcos R. D. Batista conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ana R. O. Santos performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Rafael D. Chaves performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Carlos A. Rosa analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Louis B. Klaczko conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

It will be submitted to GenBank.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The sequences will be submitted to GenBank.

Funding

Financial support agencies by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pesseal do Ensino Superior (CAPES: PRODOC 2709/2010), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq #457499/2014-1; #312066/2014-7), Fundo de Apoio ao Ensino, à Pesquisa e Extensão da Unicamp (FAEPEX-PEC2012: #1578/12), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP processos: #2012/03144-0; #2014/03791-1), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG #APQ-01525-14). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies