NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

UMP Chapter from Carvalho (2011) doctoral dissertation

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2045v1/supp-1

Sample of emails to authors requesting guidance on designing a probabilistic ontology

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2045v1/supp-2

UnBBayes files for the procurement fraud probabilistic ontology

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2045v1/supp-3

Read-me text document provides brief description of supplemental materials

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2045v1/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Kathryn B. Laskey is an Academic Editor for PeerJ Computer Science. The authors declare that they have no other competing interests.

Author Contributions

Rommel N Carvalho conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kathryn B Laskey conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, supervised software development, supervised research, directed Dr. Carvalho's PhD dissertation.

Paulo C. G. Da Costa conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper, supervised software development, served on Dr. Carvalho's PhD committee.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The probabilistic ontology tool is available for download from http://sourceforge.net/projects/unbbayes/.

Funding

This research was partially supported by the Office of Naval Research (ONR), under Contract #N00173-09-C-4008. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads