Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Delphi Panel briefing document

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1986v1/supp-1

Preamble to Round 1 survey

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1986v1/supp-2

Anonymised CATALISE Round 1 report

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1986v1/supp-3

CATALISE Round 2 statements

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1986v1/supp-4

CATALISE Round 2 background document

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1986v1/supp-5

Anonymised CATALISE Round 2 report

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1986v1/supp-6

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Dorothy V M Bishop is an Advisor and Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Dorothy V Bishop conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Margaret J Snowling conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Paul A Thompson performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Trisha Greenhalgh conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The Medical Sciences Interdisciplinary Research Ethics Committee, University of Oxford (approval number: MS-IDREC-C1-2015-061). The committee approved for panel members to give written consent for their ratings to be used to derive a consensus statement.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

We plan to deposit data in an Appendix with the published paper, which has been submitted to PLOS One.

Funding

This work was funded by Wellcome Trust Programme Grant no. 082498/Z/07/Z . The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies