Predicting trophic discrimination factor using Bayesian inference and phylogenetic, ecological and physiological data. DEsIR: Discrimination Estimation in R.
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Computational Biology, Ecology, Ecosystem Science, Zoology, Statistics
- Keywords
- Trophic Discrimination Factor, stable isotopes, trophic ecology, trophic enrichment factor, discrimination factor, mixing models, Bayesian Imputation., mammals, birds, DEsiR
- Copyright
- © 2017 Healy et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2017. Predicting trophic discrimination factor using Bayesian inference and phylogenetic, ecological and physiological data. DEsIR: Discrimination Estimation in R. PeerJ Preprints 5:e1950v2 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1950v2
Abstract
1. Stable isotope analysis is a widely used tool for the reconstruction and interpretation of animal diets and trophic relationships. Analytical tools have improved the robustness of inferring the relative contribution of different prey sources to an animal’s diet by accounting for many of the sources of variation in isotopic data. One major source of uncertainty is Trophic Discrimination Factor (TDF), the change in isotopic signatures between consumers’ tissues and their food sources. This parameter can have a profound impact on model predictions, but often, it is not feasible to estimate a species’ TDF value and so researchers often use aggregated or taxon level estimates, an assumption that in turn has major implications for the interpretation of subsequent analyses.
2. We collected extensive carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) TDF data on mammals and birds from published literature. We then used a Bayesian linear modelling approach to determine if, and to what extent, variation in TDF values can be attributed to a species’ ecology, physiology, phylogenetic relationships and experimental variation. Finally, we developed a Bayesian imputation approach to estimate unknown TDF values and compared the accuracy of this tool using a series of cross-validation tests.
3. Our results show that, for birds and mammals, TDF values are influenced by phylogeny, tissue type sampled, diet of consumer, isotopic signature of food source, and the error associated with the measurement of TDF within a species. Furthermore, our cross-validation tests determined that, our tool can (i) produce accurate estimates of TDF values with a mean distance of 0.2 ‰ from observed TDF values, and (ii) provide an estimate of the precision associated with these estimates, with species presence in the data allowing for a reduced level of uncertainty.
4. By incorporating various sources of variation and reflecting the levels of uncertainty associated with TDF estimates our novel tool will contribute to more accurate and honest reconstructions and interpretations of animal diets and trophic interactions. This tool can be extended readily to include other taxa and sources of variation as data becomes available. To facilitate this, we provide a step-by-step guide and code for this tool: Discrimination Estimation in R (DEsiR)
Author Comment
Corrected mistaken duplication of bottom panels in Figures 2 and 3. Intended panels have now been included.