NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Diastolic blood pressure readings

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1911v1/supp-1

Systolic blood pressure readings

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1911v1/supp-2

Histogram of the number of blood pressure readings recorded relative to the time since study enrollment

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1911v1/supp-3

Histogram of the number of blood pressure readings recorded relative to the time of day (PST)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1911v1/supp-4

Normalized systolic blood pressure readings

Each box is one study individual. Points are arranged along the x-axis which represents the time in days from the beginning of the study, and along the y-axis which represents the normalized diastolic blood pressure reading recorded at that time. The red line is the least squares regression line. Individuals are ordered left to right, top to bottom according to the number of readings recorded.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1911v1/supp-5

Parameter estimate and corresponding 95% confidence interval assessing change in systolic blood pressure over the course of the study

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1911v1/supp-6

Study participant demographics at enrollment visit (n=38)

Values are in counts (%) unless otherwise noted.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1911v1/supp-7

Study participant self-assessment of health (n=38)

Values are in counts (%) unless otherwise noted. * = values in mean (standard deviation).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1911v1/supp-8

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Shreya S Gollamudi analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Eric J Topol conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nathan E Wineinger conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This study was approved by the Scripps Institutional Review Board, and all study participants provided informed consent. IRB-12-6019

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplemental Dataset.

Funding

This research is funded in part by a NIH/NCATS flagship Clinical and Translational Science Award Grant (1UL1 TR001114), Qualcomm Foundation Scripps Health Digital Medicine Research Grant, and Scripps Health’s Division of Innovation and Human Capital and Division of Scripps Genomic Medicine. Support for the study is also provided by HealthComp Third Party Administrator, Sanofi, AliveCor, and Accenture. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads