Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Raw data Risk perception to analgesics 2016

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1890v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Sandra Castillo-Guzman conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Omar González-Santiago conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

Ismael A Delgado-Leal performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Gerardo E Lozano-Luévano performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables.

Misael J Reyes-Rodríguez performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

César V Elizondo-Solis performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Teresa A Nava-Obregón analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Dionicio Palacios-Ríos conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Ethical committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León. The reference number is AN15-011.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplemental Dataset

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies