Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

RAW DATA - Trajectories of all tagged tuna analyzed in this study

Dataset 1 - Raw data corresponding to the trajectories of all tagged tuna analyzed in this study

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1803v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Andres Ospina-Alvarez analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Susana Sainz Trápaga conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sergi Tudela conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Antonio Di Natale performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gemma Quílez-Badia conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The research presented in this manuscript involved no endangered or protected species and no harm to the animals. No special permission was required for the study in any of the locations as it was not required, however a special permit was granted by the Spanish Ministry "Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente" for the 2011 tagging operations in Roses and Llançà.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplemental Dataset

Funding

The project was supported by the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation, Mario Frering and the Project Oceans - United Postcode Lotteries. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies