Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Microsatellite genotypes for each individual with individual ID and collection date

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1715v3/supp-1

Summary of microsatellite loci detected by Palfinder in genomic reads

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1715v3/supp-2

R script: Calculate genome coverage from geneious blast output

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1715v3/supp-3

R script detailing Palfinder output screening

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1715v3/supp-4

R script detailing marker characterization

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1715v3/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Christine Ewers-Saucedo conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

John D Zardus contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper, specimens.

John P Wares conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

I sampled under the sampling permit of the University of Georgia Marine Institute.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

GenBank SRA, reads will be deposited prior to publication

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

We will provide the data set as supplementary information.

Funding

We would like to acknowledge our funding sources, the National Science Foundation (NSF-OCE No. 1029526) and the University of Georgia Department of Genetics Hightower Award. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies