NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

TableS1

Scientific classification and IUCN category of the 134 amphibian species analyzed . CR: critically endangered; DD: data deficient; EN: endangered; LC: least concern; NE: not evaluated; NT: near threatened; VU: vulnerable.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1681v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Sara Varela is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Ren-Yan Duan conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Xiao-Quan Kong conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Min-Yi Huang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sara Varela analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Xiang Ji conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31300342 and 31570417), Anhui Provincial National Science Foundation (1608085MC63), Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M561683). SV is supported by a postdoctoral contract at Universidad de Alcalá in Madrid, Spain. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads