Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Literature Search

Literature search: Search terms use in a Web of Science® search for peer-reviewed studies on the impacts of removal a single invasive vertebrate species on native biodiversity. Details of the search conducted on the basis of genus of the terrestrial vertebrates invasive species reported among the 100 most damaging invasive species Global Invasive Species Database

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1651v1/supp-1

References

Table 2. List of references used in this study for meta-analysis

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1651v1/supp-2

Funnel plot

Figure 4. Funnel plot analysis of sample size against the Hedges’ d value.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1651v1/supp-3

Species

Table 3. List of species and reference used for the analysis.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1651v1/supp-4

PRISMA checklist

PRISMA checklist

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1651v1/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Sebastián A Ballari conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sara E Kuebbing conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Martin A Nuñez conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any raw data.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies