Visitors   Views   Downloads
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Genotype and metadata for analyzed specimens of Pisaster

All individual genotype data are provided in this spreadsheet, with the "Master Data" tab including all genotype and metadata used in analyses. Additional information specific to site collections are located on other tabs in the spreadsheet.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1464v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

John P. Wares conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lauren M Schiebelhut performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All permits are listed in Supplement S1. Specimens were collected under California Department of Fish and Wildlife permits #11794 to L. Schiebelhut and #603 to M. N. Dawson, California State Parks permit to M. N. Dawson, and National Parks permits PORE-2012-SCI-0038, PORE-2013-SCI-0033, and REDW-2014-SCI-0018. Collections at Nanaimo were under Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans site permit at Pacific Biological Station; tissues from the San Juan Islands were re-sampled from those collected for Hewson et al. (2014).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The complete data set for this manuscript is provided as a supplemental spreadsheet.


Funds for this work come from California Sea Grant College Program grant #2012-R/ENV-223PD and National Science Foundation grant OCE-1243958 and OCE-1243970 (LMS), as well as National Science Foundation OCE-1015342 (JPW). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies