Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Alignment, Trees and sequences

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1457v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Julie M Allen conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

J Gordon Burleigh conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jessica E Light conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David L Reed conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

DNA sequences will be submitted upon publication. I have attached the sequences and the alignment to the article documents.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The alignment and resulting trees will be submitted to DRYAD upon acceptance. They have all been uploaded with the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded in part by grants from the National Science Foundation to DLR (DEB 0717165 and DEB 0845392) and JEL (DEB 0308878 and DEB 0717165). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies