Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Summary diversity indices and F-statistics for loci analyzed in Maculinea alcon

Locus name; Navg: average number of individuals per locus; A, number of alleles; AR, allelic richness adjusted for sample size using rarefaction (based on a minimum sample size of 13 individuals); HO, average observed heterozygosity; HS, Nei’s unbiased expected within-population heterozygosity; HT, Nei’s overall heterozygosity; f (FIS), Weir & Cockerham’s inbreeding coefficient; θ (FST), Weir & Cockerham’s genetic differentiation; GST': Nei's sample independent genetic differentiation, G'ST: Hedrick's standardized genetic differentiation, DEST: Jost's genetic differentiation. Values in parenthesis are standard errors; underlined values are significant after sequential Bonferroni correction; squared brackets are 95% bootstrap interval.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1416v1/supp-1

Linkage (genotypic) disequilibrium for Transylvanian Maculinea alcon populations

P-values are based on 1,680 permutations. The Bonferroni adjusted P-value for 5 % nominal level was 0.0006. Bold values were significant after sequential Bonferroni correction.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1416v1/supp-2

Comparison of the posterior probabilities of the number of clusters (K) identified by the Bayesian population assignment programs Structure, BAPS and InStruct

Each line shows the mean posterior probability for each value of K across simulations, with error bars representing the standard deviation across simulations. Also shown are the ΔK values of the posterior probabilities from Structure and InStruct using the method of Evanno, Regnaut & Goudet (2005) shown relative to the maximum value of ΔK. Peaks in the value of ΔK may represent different levels of population substructure.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1416v1/supp-3

Bayesian clustering of samples for selected values of K

Comparison of genetic clustering of samples into groups using the Bayesian clustering programs Structure, BAPS and InStruct based on the most likely number of clusters identified by each program (Fig. S2 and main text). Each column represents an individual, and is divided according to its probability of membership of different clusters, which are represented by different colours.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1416v1/supp-4

Raw data: multilocus genotypes of samples at the seven microsatellite loci used for analysis

Details of the allele sizes for each sample for each of the seven micro satellite loci used for analysis (see Table 1). Details are also given of the site and Myrmica nest from which each sample was collected.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1416v1/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

András Tartally conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Andreas Kelager performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Matthias A Fürst performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David R Nash conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

GenBank - Submissions have been made, and accession numbers should be available in a few days.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Included as supplementary material

Funding

AT was supported by a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship and a Marie Curie Career Integration Grant within the 7th European Community Framework Programme, and by a ‘Bolyai János’ scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA). AK and DRN were supported by a Danish National Research Foundation grant to the Centre for Social Evolution (DNRF57) and the Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies