Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Appendix B: Scientific abalone (pāua, Haliotis iris) surveys

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1388v2/supp-2

Appendix C: Supporting figures and tables

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1388v2/supp-3

Appendix D: Pāua shell lengths at Fighting Bay

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1388v2/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Edward R. Abraham and Philipp Neubauer are employees of Dragonfly Data Science.

Author Contributions

Edward R Abraham conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Philipp Neubauer analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

We will provide a copy of our model code through Figshare. We will negotiate with the Ministry for Primary Industries to make the data needed to run the models available, so that the results may be replicated.

Funding

This research was funded by the New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries (project PAU2010-03), with co-funding from Seafood Innovations Limited. This research was commissioned by the New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries, with co-funding from Seafood Innovations Limited (a New Zealand agency that funds applied research in the fisheries sector). The research was taken through the Ministry for Primary Industries Working Group process. The working group has representation from government, from other fisheries stakeholders, and technical advisors. The working group reviewed the experimental design, analysis, and the project reporting that was used as a basis for this manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies