NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Supplemental Information

Table S1. Overview of all 183 bacterial phylotypes along with their relative abundances per endometrial community (n=19)

Phylotype number is a unique number to designate each annotated operational taxonomic unit in this study; annotation refers to the highest taxonomic level to which an phylotype could be annotated; numbers mentioned for each phylotype in each study subject represent the numbers of reads per sample for the given phylotype.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1269v1/supp-1

Figure S1. Rarefaction curves illustrating sampling depth

Each curve shows the sampling depth as a function of the number of reads.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1269v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Hans Verstraelen conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, conceived of the study, obtained ethical approval, coordinated the research.

Ramiro Vilchez-Vargas analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Fabian Desimpel performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ruy Jauregui contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nele Vankeirsbilck reviewed drafts of the paper, recruited patients.

Steven Weyers conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper, recruited patients.

Rita Verhelst conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Petra De Sutter conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Dietmar H Pieper conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tom Van De Wiele conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ghent University Hospital Institutional Review Board (Principal Investifator: Hans Verstraelen).

The Ghent University Hospital Institutional Review Board assigned the study reference number EC2013/053.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
3 Citations   Views   Downloads