Review History


All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.

Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.

View examples of open peer review.

Summary

  • The initial submission of this article was received on February 7th, 2022 and was peer-reviewed by 3 reviewers and the Academic Editor.
  • The Academic Editor made their initial decision on March 6th, 2022.
  • The first revision was submitted on March 14th, 2022 and was reviewed by 2 reviewers and the Academic Editor.
  • The article was Accepted by the Academic Editor on April 4th, 2022.

Version 0.2 (accepted)

· Apr 4, 2022 · Academic Editor

Accept

The paper can be accepted. Congratulations.

[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Jun Chen, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]

·

Basic reporting

It is suitable for publish

Experimental design

It is suitable for publish

Validity of the findings

It is suitable for publish

Additional comments

It is suitable for publish

Reviewer 3 ·

Basic reporting

Improved.

Experimental design

Improved.

Validity of the findings

Improved.

Additional comments

None

Version 0.1 (original submission)

· Mar 6, 2022 · Academic Editor

Major Revisions

A major revision is needed to address some shortcomings raised by the reviewers. Please provide a detailed response letter. I plan to invite a new reviewer to assess your revised version instead of sending it back to the present reviewers.

[# PeerJ Staff Note: It is PeerJ policy that additional references suggested during the peer-review process should only be included if the authors are in agreement that they are relevant and useful #]

[# PeerJ Staff Note: Please ensure that all review and editorial comments are addressed in a response letter and any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate. #]

·

Basic reporting

-

Experimental design

-

Validity of the findings

-

Additional comments

Please add contribution with bullet mark in introduction (Please see and cite [1-9])
Please add lit. review table and add your research in end of table and show gap research (Please see and cite [1-9])
Please add notation list and classify to sets (indices) , parameters, decision variables (Please see and cite [1-9])
Please add Managerial insights and practical implications (Please see and cite [1-9]).
Please add results with bullet mark in conclusion (Please see and cite [1-9]).
Please suggest uncertainty form like fuzzy, robust optimization, data-driven and stochastic.
Please suggest risk form like CVaR, VaR.

[1] Lotfi, R., Kheiri, K., Sadeghi, A., & Babaee Tirkolaee, E. (2022). An extended robust mathematical model to project the course of COVID-19 epidemic in Iran. Annals of Operations Research, 1-25.
[2] Lotfi, R., Kargar, B., Gharehbaghi, A., & Weber, G. W. (2021). Viable medical waste chain network design by considering risk and robustness. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-16.
[3] Lotfi, R., Mardani, N., & Weber, G. W. (2021). Robust bi-level programming for renewable energy location. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(5), 7521-7534.
[4] Lotfi, R., Kargar, B., Hoseini, S. H., Nazari, S., Safavi, S., & Weber, G. W. Resilience and sustainable supply chain network design by considering renewable energy. International Journal of Energy Research.
[5] Lotfi, R., Mehrjerdi, Y. Z., Pishvaee, M. S., Sadeghieh, A., & Weber, G. W. (2021). A robust optimization model for sustainable and resilient closed-loop supply chain network design considering conditional value at risk. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 11(2), 221.
[6] Lotfi, R., Yadegari, Z., Hosseini, S. H., Khameneh, A. H., Tirkolaee, E. B., & Weber, G. W. (2020). A robust time-cost-quality-energy-environment trade-off with resource-constrained in project management: A case study for a bridge construction project. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization.
[7] Lotfi, R., Safavi, S., Gharehbaghi, A., Ghaboulian Zare, S., Hazrati, R., & Weber, G. W. (2021). Viable Supply Chain Network Design by considering Blockchain Technology and Cryptocurrency. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021.
[8] Lotfi, R., Sheikhi, Z., Amra, M., AliBakhshi, M., & Weber, G. W. (2021). Robust optimization of risk-aware, resilient and sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design with Lagrange relaxation and fix-and-optimize. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 1-41.
[9] Lotfi, R., Kargar, B., Rajabzadeh, M., Hesabi, F., & ?zceylan, E. (2022). Hybrid Fuzzy and Data-Driven Robust Optimization for Resilience and Sustainable Health Care Supply Chain with Vendor-Managed Inventory Approach. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 1-16.

Reviewer 2 ·

Basic reporting

The English is poor. Authors have to revise the paper carefully. For example, "The discovery of a new form of corona-viruses in December 2019, SARS-CoV-2, commonly named covid-19, has transformed the world." the word transformed here is wrongly used. "The world has been waiting for the vaccine for almost one year." may be more than one year? Also line 261 and line 265 should be corrected.

Experimental design

The numerical experiment are given. However, wome detail illustration should be given on these results with figures.

Validity of the findings

The results in this paper deserve publication.

Additional comments

The references are not completed, such as Nonlinear Dynamics 106, 1491-1507, 2021, Nonlinear Dynamics 106, 1347-1358, 2021.

Reviewer 3 ·

Basic reporting

The COVID-19 pandemic has already spread throughout the world and the people are aware about the diseases and they are using precautions about the pandemic. But, still the covid-19 is spreading very quickly. Formulate a mathematical model for the transmission dynamics of COVID-19. Few minor issues:

---- The abstract is a little thin and does not quite convey the vibrancy of the findings and the depth of the main conclusions. The authors should please extend this somewhat for a better first impression.
---- The manuscript lacks motivation. Author needs to include the motivation of the study.
-----To stop the spread of the diseases vaccine is needed. But, in absence of the vaccine people must have maintain the social distancing. In order to maintain the social distancing must obey the modeling rule. The introduction need to be improved by incorporating some recent references of COVID-19 pandemic. To do so, I suggest some modeling work must be included in the references: "Modeling and forecasting the COVID-19 pandemic in India, Chaos, Soliton & Fract. 139 (2020) 110049", “Mathematical modeling of the COVID-19 outbreak with intervention strategies, Results in Physics, 2021, 104285”.

Experimental design

Need to explain properly the parameter estimation. For parameter estimation and model validation authors should include the manuscripts:

"Forecasting the daily and cumulative number of cases for the COVID-19 pandemic in India, Chaos, 30(7) (2020) 071101", “Impact of social media advertisements on the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 pandemic in India, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing (2021)”

Validity of the findings

For model validation and proper writing of the manuscript authors should include the manuscripts: "Modeling the dynamics of COVID-19 pandemic with implementation of intervention strategies, The European Physical Journal Plus (2022)"; "Mathematical modeling and optimal intervention strategies of the COVID-19 outbreak, Nonlinear Dynamics, (2022)".

Additional comments

No coemmnts.

All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.