Ancient lineages hold significant information for understanding the biogeographic past of different regions (Fjeldsaå & Lovett, 1997). A large concentration of old lineages may signify historical refugia that are of great evolutionary and conservation significance. In South Asia, the Western Ghats (WG) escarpment of Peninsular India and the island of Sri Lanka have long been recognized as rainforest refuges (Wallace, 1876; Mani, 1974). These regions are an evolutionary repository for amphibians with hundreds of frog species from nine families: Bufonidae Gray, 1825; Dicroglossidae Anderson, 1871; Micrixalidae Dubois, Ohler & Biju, 2001; Microhylidae Günther, 1858 (1843); Nasikabatrachidae Biju & Bossuyt, 2003; Nyctibatrachidae Blommers-Schlösser, 1993; Ranidae Batsch, 1796; Ranixalidae Dubois, 1987; and Rhacophoridae Hoffman, 1932 (1858) (see Dutta et al., 2004; Van Bocxlaer et al., 2009; Biju et al., 2011, 2014; Vijayakumar et al., 2014; Dinesh et al., 2015; Dahanukar et al., 2016). Three of these frog families (Micrixalidae, Ranixalidae, and Nasikabatrachidae) are endemic to the WG, while a fourth, Nyctibatrachidae, consists of two subfamilies: Nyctibatrachinae which is endemic to the WG, and Lankanectinae which is endemic to Sri Lanka.
This evolutionarily distinct and diverse assemblage of frogs has only been recently uncovered by studies highlighting the radiation of ancient lineages (Roelants, Jiang & Bossuyt, 2004) and high clade-level endemism in the WG and Sri Lanka (Meegaskumbura et al., 2002; Bossuyt et al., 2004). These studies have provided new insights and perspectives, triggering renewed interest within the research community to document and understand frog diversity in the WG. Accordingly, a number of higher-level taxa (e.g., families) have been recognized from the WG, including representatives from Ranixalidae, Nyctibatrachidae, and Micrixalidae, which historically were recognized as subfamilies of Ranidae (Blommers-Schlösser, 1993; Dubois, 2005) but were subsequently elevated to families (Frost et al., 2006). These taxa are part of the larger, primarily Old World natatanuran radiation that diversified across Afrotropical, Madagascan, Palearctic, and Oriental realms (Bossuyt et al., 2006; Wiens et al., 2009; Feng et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2018).
Here, we report the discovery of a hitherto unknown taxon; an ancient, monotypic, microendemic lineage forming a strongly supported clade with Nyctibatrachidae Blommers-Schlösser, 1993. Based on its geographic distribution, age, phylogenetic position, deep morphological divergence, and distinct habits, we assign the taxon to a new subfamily Astrobatrachinae subfam. nov. and genus Astrobatrachus gen. nov., and describe a single new species Astrobatrachus kurichiyana sp. nov. The discovery adds to the list of ancient and monotypic lineages with narrow geographic ranges in the southern massifs of the WG.
Materials and Methods
The taxon was discovered during an expedition to an isolated hill range (Kurichiyarmala) located on the western edge of Wayanad Plateau in the south-central region of the WG Escarpment (Fig. 1). The expedition was part of a large-scale survey for amphibians and reptiles across all the major massifs and plateaus in the WG (see Vijayakumar et al., 2014). Individuals were captured in June 2010 during nocturnal searches on the forest floor and in grasslands adjoining forest. One of us (KPD) revisited the site in September 2017 and carried out intensive night sampling to understand the general habits and habitat of the species. A subset of the individuals collected were fixed and stored in 70% alcohol, while others were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and stored in 70% alcohol. Liver tissues were extracted and stored in 95% alcohol before fixing in formaldehyde. Photographs of live individuals, on which color descriptions are based, were taken before euthanizing the individuals. The type specimens have been deposited at the Zoological Survey of India (ZSI), Western Regional Centre (WRC), Pune. Specimens were collected under permit numbers WL12-6574/2006 from the Kerala Forest Department. At the time of the initial study, IISc did not maintain a formal ethics committee for field research conducted under valid permits. All field research was conducted in ethical compliance with the SSAR Guidelines (Beaupre et al., 2004).
DNA sequencing and alignment
We generated new DNA-sequence data from four specimens using existing primers. We sequenced 16S and RHOD (CESF 1566) and CYTB and RHOD (CESF 1567) (primers from Frost et al., 2006). We also developed new primers for the RAG1 locus: RAG1_Forward_Primer 5′-GATGGAATGGGAGATGTYAGYGAGAA-3′, RAG1_Reverse_Primer 5′-AAAAGTTYTGCRAARCGTTGAGAGTG-3′. These primers amplify and sequence an approximately ∼850 bp piece of the RAG1 locus that is homologous with the fragment sequenced for hundreds of amphibian species in many existing datasets (e.g., Roelants et al., 2007). We also developed new primers for the CXCR4 locus: CXCR4_Ranoidea_Forward 5′-TGGTCTGTGGATGCYGCCATYGGTTGGTA-3′, CXCR4_Ranoidea_Reverse 5′-ATGTAGTAYGGVAGCCARCAGGC-3′. We generated 835 bp of sequence from a third specimen (CESF 2895) for RAG1 and 459 bp for CXCR4.
We used an existing alignment (Jetz & Pyron, 2018—JP hereafter) to place these new taxa in the Amphibian Tree of Life. The JP matrix contains 15 genes (5 mitochondrial, 10 nuclear), including 16S, CYTB, CXCR4, RAG1, and RHOD. The other 10 alignments (12S, BDNF, H3A, NCX1, ND1, ND2, POMC, SIA, SLC8A3, and TYR) were used without modification. The GenBank accession numbers for the existing sequences are given by Jetz & Pyron (2018). Our new sequences have been deposited under the GenBank numbers MK144662, MK153264–MK153268.
The new data were added to the JP alignments using the ‘Profile Align’ feature in Geneious 11.0.4 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, NZ). For CYTB and RHOD, there was no length variation, and thus the profiled alignments required no further refinement. For 16S, we realigned the regions overlapping with the new sequences using the MAFFT algorithm (Katoh et al., 2002) in Geneious, under the default settings. Similarly, as CXCR4 and RAG1 contain several indels, we realigned those sequences using the ‘Translation Align’ option with the MAFFT algorithm.
The JP matrix had 4,062 terminals and 15,091 bp. Our final matrix had 4,063 terminals and 15,359 bp. As the samples of the new species did not overlap sufficiently in terms of sampled loci, we concatenated the 16S, CYTB, CXCR4, RAG1, and RHOD data from the three specimens, and included these data as a single composite terminal, for a total of 2,125 bp from five genes. This is justified as all three individuals were sampled from the same site and shared the unique morphological characteristics described below, and overlapping sequences were invariant.
We used PartitionFinder 2 (Lanfear et al., 2017) to estimate the best partitioning strategy, given two ribosomal genes and 13 protein-coding genes for a total of 41 possible partitions including codon positions. We used the--raxml (Stamatakis, 2006) and search = ‘rcluster’ (Lanfear et al., 2014) flags to decrease computational intensity, given the size of the matrix. We restricted the model set to GTR+G, as we used RAxML version 8 (Stamatakis, 2014), which only supports GTR and recommends using the GAMMA approximation for very large matrices. Thus, we were essentially estimating the number of distinct partitions less than or equal to 41 that needed to be modeled using GTRGAMMA in RAxML.
PartitionFinder 2 identified 28 distinct model segments for the GTR-GAMMA model across the 41 possible partitions. We then used ExaML version 3.0 (Kozlov, Aberer & Stamatakis, 2015) to infer phylogenies, under a similar strategy to the one used by Jetz & Pyron (2018). We generated 500 randomized parsimony trees using RaxMLv8.2.9 and used these as starting points for 500 independent ExaML searches. For the highest-scoring ExaML tree, we used the SHL-optimum function in RAxML to perform a final round of NNI-optimization and calculate SHL-support values for nodes, which show strong performance relative to traditional non-parametric bootstrap values (see Pyron et al., 2011). Combined with the newly optimized partitioning strategy and partial re-alignment, this will yield a thorough estimate of the ML phylogeny for this dataset. All data, code, and results are available at Dryad repository DOI 10.5061/dryad.4q3d25m.
The following measurements were obtained from preserved specimens, measured to the nearest 0.1 mm using digital calipers: Snout to Vent Length—SVL, Head Length—HL, Snout Length—SL, Eye Length—EL, Inter Upper Eyelid Width—IUE, maximum Upper Eyelid Width—UEW, Inter-Narial distance—IN, distance between anterior corner of eyes—IFE, Tympanum Diameter—TYD, Fore-Limb Length—FLL, Hind-Limb Length—HAL, First Finger Length—FL1, Second Finger Length—FL2, Third Finger Length—FL3, Fourth Finger Length—FL4, Thigh Length—TL, Crus Length—CL, Foot Length—FOL, Tarsal Length—TAL, Fourth Toe Length—TL4, Inner Toe Length—ITL, Inner Metatarsal Tubercle Length—IMTL, Nostril to Eye Length—NE, Back of Mandible to Nostril Length—MN, Back of Mandible to front of Eye Length—MFE, Back of Mandible to back of Eye Length—MBE, Length between the Back of the Eyes—IBE, Length from Tympanum to the Back of the eye—TE.
High resolution computed tomography (CT) scans were produced for two specimens of the new species, CESF 1565 and CESF 2898, at the GE India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. facility in Pune, India using a Phoenix v|tome|x M (GE’s Measurement & Control business, Boston, MA, USA) with a 180 kV x-ray tube with a diamond-tungsten target and with the following settings: 60–80 kV, 300 mA, a one second detector time, averaging of three images per rotation and a voxel resolution of 3.0–4.9 µm. Additional CT-scans for comparisons were also generated at the Indian Institute of Science or were obtained from MorphoSource, having been generated separately as part of the oVert Thematic Collections Network at either the University of Florida Nanoscale or the University of Chicago PaleoCT lab. Raw x-ray data were processed using GE’s proprietary datos|x software v 2.3 to produce a series of tomogram images that were then viewed and analyzed using VG StudioMax 3.0.3 (Volume Graphics, Heidelberg, Germany). For osteological terminology, we follow Trueb, Diaz & Blackburn (2011), though we refer to the manual digits as I–IV rather than II–V to avoid confusion for most taxonomists. All image stacks, associated metadata, and surface models utilized in this study are available online via MorphoSource (Table S1).
Theoretical and operational criteria for the diagnosis and delimitation of taxa at different ranks are crucial for a robust systematic revision. For diagnosis of species-level taxa, we follow the generalized lineage concept (De Queiroz, 2007) and further split the conventional diagnosis section into lineage diagnosis and field diagnosis (Vijayakumar et al., 2014). The lineage diagnosis provides a description of how the lineage can be diagnosed along multiple axes (phylogenetic, morphological, ecological, and geographic) from related or similar lineages (Shanker, Vijayakumar & Ganeshaiah, 2017). Since there is poor support for sister taxa, we make comparisons with all other relatives within the next well-supported node.
We employed a comprehensive sampling strategy for all frogs, covering the topographic heterogeneity of the WG across latitudinal, elevational and rainfall gradients, ensuring that we detected sympatric relatives with confidence. The field diagnosis illustrates characters that could help diagnose the lineage in the field from syntopic and broadly sympatric species in the sister clades. For higher-level taxa above the species level, we assess whether or not the new lineage occupies a topological position within a currently recognized taxon (genealogical inclusivity), and whether or not it matches the diagnostic characters for that taxon (morphological inclusivity).
The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) will represent a published work according to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix http://zoobank.org/. The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5ADE399C-37CC-4821-BD81-15F420731BB7. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central and CLOCKSS.
The unidentified species was found to be a member of the diverse, primarily Old World radiation Ranoidea, specifically within Natatanura (see Feng et al., 2017). It forms a strongly supported clade with the two genera of Nyctibatrachidae (ML, bootstrap support = 94), though the sister relationship between those genera is not strongly supported (Fig. 2). Given the deep divergences between Nyctibatrachus, Lankanectes, and the new lineage, the age of the MRCA of these three lineages fall within the range of the stem age of Nyctibatrachidae and the crown age of Natatanura, recently estimated to be in the Late Cretaceous or Paleocene (∼57–76 Ma) (Van Bocxlaer et al., 2012; Pyron, 2014; Yuan et al., 2018).
The full phylogeny (see inset on Fig. 2) is provided in the DataDryad repository (see above), and generally agrees with the results of Jetz & Pyron (2018). For the reduced figure (Fig. 2), a random species was chosen from the indicated families. Branch lengths are given in substitutions per million years as estimated from the partitioned GTRGAMMA model in RAxML. Based on the topology and branch lengths from the molecular phylogeny, the unidentified lineage is clearly a highly divergent new species based on genealogical exclusivity. We demonstrate that this new species is also morphologically diagnosable from other natatanuran taxa endemic to the WG. We were thus able to generate both a Lineage and Field diagnosis for a new subfamily, genus, and species. In the following section, we provide the diagnosis and description for the new lineage at each of these taxonomic ranks, in comparison with similar or related taxa.
The lineage shares common ancestry with Nyctibatrachus Boulenger, 1882 (a diverse clade composed of >30 species) in the subfamily Nyctibatrachinae, and Lankanectes Dubois & Ohler, 2001 (a clade from Sri Lanka with two species) in the subfamily Lankanectinae. It shows deep genetic divergence from these two subfamilies, unique morphological traits (see below; Table 1), and differs in habits, habitat, and distribution from its close relatives (see below). Based on this, we use the phylogenetic position, morphology, terrestrial habits, and geographical distribution to diagnose the subfamily Astrobatrachinae subfam. nov. in an expanded Nyctibatrachidae, which is restricted to the WG and Sri Lanka.
|Type species||Astrobatrachus kurichiyana sp. nov.||Nyctibatrachus major Boulenger, 1882||Lankanectes corrugatus (Peters, 1863)|
|Adult male (SVL) in mm||20–27||13–46||33–68.7|
|Adult female (SVL) in mm||24–29||14–47||44–59|
|Internarial distance||Equal to distance between upper eyelids||Shorter than distance between upper eyelids||Shorter than distance between upper eyelids|
|Upper eyelids||Smooth without warts||Without warts or covered with numerous rounded warts||Covered with numerous rounded warts|
|Canthus rostralis||Distinct||Indistinct or little distinct||Indistinct|
|Loreal region||Concave||Slightly concave to convex||Slightly convex|
|Coloration of edge of lower jaw||Without transverse bands||Without transverse bands||Without transverse bands|
|Tympanum||Distinct||Indistinct or little distinct||Indistinct|
|Extremities of digits||Mostly triangular without dorsoterminal folds||Disks bearing dorsoterminal folds||Extremities of fingers pointed, or toes slightly rounded without dorsoterminal folds|
|Relative length of fingers one and two||Mostly sub-equal||Finger two longer than finger one||Indistinct|
|Distal sub articular tubercles on finger three and four||Indistinct and primitive||Indistinct||Absent|
|Inner palmar tubercle||Absent||Small, oval rather prominent, on base of metacarpus||Very small, rounded on base of metacarpus|
|Outer palmar tubercle||Absent||Oval, about half size of inner palmar tubercle||Very small, rounded, of same size as inner palmar tubercle|
|Hind legs||Weak and short||Strong, short||Very strong, short|
|Distance between heels when hind legs are placed at right angle with body||Heels just touch||Heels far apart||Heels far apart|
|Tarsal fold or ridge||Absent||Present well developed||Present well developed|
|Inner metatarsal tubercle||Present, primitive (no distinction between inner metatarsal tubercle and sub articular tubercle)||Long, oval prominent||Flat, elongate|
|Femoral glands||Presence doubtful, appears faint in life, not raised on or below the skin||Present/Absent||Present/Absent|
|Lateral line system in adult||Absent||Absent||Present|
|Network of ridges on back and head||Absent||Absent||Present|
|Coloration of rear part of thighs||No pattern, cream white with faint minute dotted gray marbling||Marbled||Marbled|
|Sex size dimorphism||Absent||Absent||Absent|
|Fangs in adult male||Absent||Absent||Present|
|Vocal sacs in adult male||NA||Present, internal, with folds on throat||Present, internal, without folds on throat|
|Male advertisement call||NA||Present||Present|
|Nuptial pads in adult male||Absent||Present||Absent/Present|
|Amplectic position||NA||Absence of physical contact||Axillary amplexus|
|Egg coloration||NA||Pigmented or not||Pigmented|
|Mode of development||NA||Tadpole||Tadpole|
|Eye color pattern||Oval, black pupil with bright golden orange ring; iris brownish with interspersed golden yellow sparks||Mostly pupil rhomboidal with golden brown iris||Pupil rhomboidal with golden brown iris|
|Digital tips shape||Mostly triangular||Blunt rounded to enlarged discs||Rounded, enlarged without disc|
|Dorsoterminal grooves||Absent||Discs with or without dorsoterminal grooves||Absent|
|Dorsal skin pattern||Smooth, glandular||Shagreened, glandular or wrinkled skin||Corrugated with transverse skin folds|
|Webbing between fingers||Dorsally rudimentary between fingers three and four; ventrally rudimentary||Absent||Absent|
|Median lingual process||Absent||Present||Absent|
|Dorsal color pattern||Brown, with bluish spots that are prominent on the lateral side||Dark brown to light brown with or without patterns||Brown to chocolate brown|
|Ventral color pattern||Light gray with bluish spots on the throat region; bright orange at the region of stomach and thighs||Varying from cream white to interspersed brown spots||White mottled with brown|
|Species contained||Monotypic||36 species (Frost, 2018)||2 species (Senevirathne et al., 2018)|
|Geographical distribution||Western Ghats, Peninsular India||Western Ghats, Peninsular India||Sri Lanka|
|Dubois & Ohler, 2001; Biju et al., 2011||Dubois & Ohler, 2001; Biju et al., 2011; Senevirathne et al., 2018|
Amphibia Linnaeus, 1758
Anura Fischer von Waldheim, 1813
Ranoidea Batsch, 1796
Natatanura Frost et al., 2006
Nyctibatrachidae Blommers-Schlosser, 1993
Astrobatrachinae subfam. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:28F98D95-3E1E-41BB-B7A1-CC6766432E22
Type genus.—Astrobatrachus gen. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:28F98D95-3E1E-41BB-B7A1-CC6766432E22, by present designation.
Etymology of the generic nomen.—From the Greek astro- for ‘star,’ referring to the starry spots, more prominent on the lateral sides of the body, and batrachus meaning ‘frog’. As per the nomenclatural act the gender of genus is ‘male.’
Type species.—Astrobatrachus kurichiyana sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A4A21F51-2A11-41C6-AA2A-B6F390070868, by present designation
Holotype.—ZSI/WRC/A/2131 (male, Fig. 3C–3E) by present designation, collected by S.P. Vijayakumar, K.P. Dinesh, and a team from Kurichiyarmala (11.602807° N 75.968025° E, alt.1420 m), Wayanad Plateau, WG during an expedition on 21st June 2010.
Paratypes.—ZSI/WRC/A/2132 (CESF 1565) (male), and ZSI/WRC/A/2133 (CESF 2897) (female); site same as holotype collection.
Diagnosis.—This diagnosis applies to the subfamily, genus, and species. The following combination of characters can be used to diagnose this lineage from its close relatives Nyctibatrachus and Lankanectes: small to medium size (∼ 20–27 mm SVL); soft skin without ridged or wrinkled folds; fingers and toe tips with discs that are triangular in shape (Figs. 3 and 4) without circummarginal groove; upper jaws having distinct teeth; distinct and angular canthus rostralis; distinct tympanum with a prominent supra-tympanic ridge (Fig. 3); tongue lacking median papilla; short hind and fore-limbs; oblong subarticular tubercles on the fingers and toes that sometimes nearly coalesce (e.g., pedal digit III in Figs. 3 and 4); interdigital webbing on foot does not attain most proximal subarticular tubercle; absence of femoral glands; absence of nuptial pads in males; widely spaced nasal bones; a vomer separated into an anterior portion adjacent to the choana and a posterior dentigerous vomer fused to a neopalatine; omosternum not bifurcating posteriorly; a single narrow sternal element; lacking a large dorsal crest on the ilium; bluish-white spots (Figs. 3 and 4), more prominent and scattered along the lateral sides of jaws, eyelids, belly, forearms and hind limbs, and on the throat; oval-shaped pupil; orange coloration of ventral sides of belly, forelimbs and hind limbs; elliptical pupil (Fig. 3). The lineage is diagnosed easily in the field from species of Nyctibatrachus that occur sympatrically.
Description of holotype ZSI/WRC/A/2131 (male)
A small-sized frog (SVL = 20.2 mm) with a squat, lean body (see Table 2); head length approximately equal to head width (HL = 7.2 mm; HW = 7.3 mm); snout acutely pointed in dorsal and obtusely pointed in ventral views; snout length (SL = 3.0 mm) approximately equal to eye diameter (EL = 2.9 mm); canthus rostralis angular, loreal region concave; inter orbital space flat and wide (IUE = 2.8 mm), 2.3 times more than upper eye lid (UEW = 1.2 mm) and subequal to inter-narial distance (IN = 2.6 mm); distance between back of eyes two times more than front of eyes (IFE = 3.8 mm; IBE = 7.8 mm); nostrils oval, nearer to tip of snout and lateral in position; symphysial knob weak; tympanum distinct visible below supratympanic fold (TYD = 1.2 mm); weak vomerine ridges present with three to four teeth; tongue bifid without papilla; lower jaw without teeth, upper jaw with distinct sharp teeth. Forearm slender (FLL = 5.8 mm) longer than hand (HAL = 4.0 mm); fingers short and thin without dermal fringes; relative finger length IV < I < II < III (FL1 = 2.3 mm, FL2 = 2.8 mm, FL3 = 3.4 mm, FL4 = 2.0 mm); finger tips triangular and blunt without circummarginal groove; webbing between fingers rudimentary; subarticular tubercles of fingers oblong with indistinct margins; pollex tubercle absent; supernumerary tubercles absent. Hindlimbs short, just touching when adpressed, and tibio-tarsal articulation reaches back of eyes; thigh length approximately equal to crus length (TL = 9.3 mm; CL = 9.0 mm); foot length is greater than tarsus length (FOL = 9.3 mm, TAL = 6.8 mm), relative toe length I < II < V < III < IV (TL4 = 4.8 mm; ITL = 2.0 mm); webbing rudimentary (not reaching the most proximal subarticular tubercle); inner metatarsal tubercle (IMTL = 1.0) small and nearly continuous with subarticular tubercle of first toe; subarticular tubercles of toes oblong and indistinct, coalescing on some toes; outer metatarsal tubercle absent and supernumerary tubercles absent. Overall skin on dorsum soft, finely glandular, ventrally smooth glandular. Rictal gland and ocular gland absent.
|ZSI/WRC/A/2131 (Holotype)||ZSI/WRC/A/2132 (CESF 1565) (Paratype)||ZSI/WRC/A/2133 (CESF 2897) (Paratype)|
Coloration of holotype
In life, overall color on dorsum rufous brown, darker in anterior region of body and light in posterior part of body. Small pale bluish-white spots present all over body but larger and more concentrated on lateral, gular, anterior ventrum, and around tympanic region, jaws, and eyelid. In ventral region, arm, belly, thigh, and crus bright orange in color; gular region is dark gray with bluish white spots. Under surface of hand and foot dark gray. In preservative, color on dorsum dark brown with cream spots. Gular and anterior ventrum dark gray interspersed with cream spots, with melanocytes becoming widely spaced posteriorly; arm, posterior belly, thigh, and crus cream colored; hand and foot dark gray with pale gray skin under digit tips and subarticular tubercles.
Based on micro-CT scan of ZSI/WRC/2132 (paratype; male) and CESF 2898 and 2899 (reference collections, females) (Figs. 5 and 6). The skull is lightly constructed, slightly longer than wide, lacking ornamented dermal bones, and having jaw joints that are anterior to the occiput. The prootics are incompletely ossified and not synostosed to the exoccipital or frontoparietals. The lateral walls of the neurocranium are not ossified such that the optic fenestrae and prootic foramina are not bounded in bone. The frontoparietals are broad, approximately 3/5 the width of the length, and do not articulate at the midline. The nasals are widely spaced. The premaxillae bear teeth, and each has a prominent pars dentalis and a robust alary process that is taller than wide and widely separated from the nasal. The maxillae bear teeth for approximately two-thirds of their length and are nearly straight. The quadratojugals are elongate, extending anterior to the body of the squamosal. The pterygoids are triradiate, each with a long anterior ramus that articulates with the maxilla near the posterior level of the maxillary teeth, a long posterior ramus extending to the jaw joint, and a short and thin medial ramus extending towards but not articulating with the prootic. The anterior portion of the vomer is small and distinct, forming a C-shape around the anteromedial surface of the choanae. This anterior portion is not connected to the dentigerous posterior portion that is synostosed to the neopalatine. The sphenethmoid is located anterior to the rostral extent of the parasphenoid, either abuts or is synostosed to the neopalatine, and has well-ossified tectum and septum nasi that separate prominent circular olfactory foramina. The parasphenoid is triradiate with the rostral extent of the cultriform process being V-shaped and not attaining the sphenethmoids, and the lateral alae underlying the otic capsule. The squamosals are prominent with a zygomatic ramus that tapers rostrally, and a posterior ramus forming a small shelf just lateral to, but not synostosed to, the proootic. A thin distally tapering stapes (or columella) is present, terminating just below the posterior ramus of the squamosal; an ossified operculum is not present. The posteromedial processes of the hyoid are short and weakly expanded at their posterior ends.
There are eight distinct, procoelous, non-imbricating presacral vertebrae that are not fused to one another and all of which have a large neural canal. The atlas lacks transverse processes and has widely separated cotyles. The transverse processes of Presacrals II are directly laterally, whereas those of Presacrals III–VII are directed posteriorly. Presacral VIII has weakly anteriorly directed transverse processes and a biconvex centrum, making the vertebral column displasiocoelous. The sacrum is procoelous with short transverse processes and has two condyles posteriorly. The urostyle bears two cotyles, which are not confluent, for articulation with the urostyle and a tall dorsal ridge that tapers posteriorly, ending approximately at the anteroposterior midpoint.
The pectoral girdle is firmisternal and no elements are in direct articulation or synostosed. The scapula has a defined waist, expanding dorsally, and has an expanded and rounded acromial process. The clavicle is thin and nearly perfectly straight. The coracoid is widely expanded medially, with the medial extent approximately twice as wide as the lateral extent. A small omosternum is expanded posteriorly and tapers anteriorly. A stout and nearly rectangular bony xiphisternum projects distally from the coracoids.
In CESF 2898, the three elements of the pelvic girdle—ilium, ischium, and pubis— are ossified and synostosed to one another. The shaft of the ilium is long and bears a weakly developed supraacetabular fossa, a well-defined dorsal protuberance, and a short dorsal crest for most of its length. The synostosis of the pelvic elements creates a broad sheet of bone posterior, ventral, and anterior to the acetabulum. In CESF 1565, the ventral acetabular expansion projects anteriorly, but not ventrally below the point at the margin of the acetabulum at which the ilium and pubis meet; the ischium and pubis are not fully ossified in this specimen.
The humerus is thin and straight with a weakly developed ventral crest and entepicondyle. The forearm is approximately two-thirds the length of the humerus. The radiale and ulnare are large and elongate, and subequal in size. The distal carpals are fused into two groups: Element Y + distal carpal 2, and distal carpals 3+4+5. The phalangeal formula for the manus is 2–2–3–3 and there are two small ossified elements of the prepollex that are more ossified and discernable in the larger specimens (CESF 2898 and 2899). The terminal manual phalanges are blunt distally, and in some cases tapering. The tibiofibula and femur are similar in length. There is a tarsal sesamoid on the ventral surface at the articulation of the tibiofibula and the tibiale and fibulare. There are two distal tarsals, two small ossified elements in the prehallux, and a sesamoid on the plantar surface at the base of metatarsals IV and V. The phalangeal formula for the pes is 2–2–3–4–3. The terminal pedal phalanges taper and then expand into a small blunt tip.
Astrobatrachus is clearly distinguishable from other members of the Nyctibatrachidae as well as other families endemic to the WG (Table 3). No information is available on the larval biology or reproductive modes of Astrobatrachus. Astrobatrachus differs from Lankanectes in lacking dorsal skin ridges, lacking a lateral line system as an adult, having a distinct tympanum and canthus rostralis, lacking odontoid fangs, having widely spaced nasals, having a long ridge of vomerine teeth, having separate anterior and posterior portions of the vomer with the latter fused to the neopalatine, lacking a forked omosternum, lacking a prominent dorsal crest on the ilium, and lacking both a tarsal fold and webbed pedal phalanges (Dubois & Ohler, 2001; Senevirathne et al., 2018; Figs. 5 and 6). Similar to Lankanectes, Astrobatrachus lacks a median lingual papilla and femoral glands, lacks circummarginal grooves on the digits (present in some Nyctibatrachus), has a second finger longer than the first finger, and indistinct subarticular tubercles.
|Characters/species||N. grandis||N. minimus||N. vrijueni||N. kempholeyensis||N. indraneli||Astrobatarchus kurichiyana|
|Skin||Wrinkled with granular projections||Interrupted dorsolateral folds and faint granular projections||Wrinkled skin||Wrinkled skin with granular projections||Wrinkled||Smooth|
|Webbing between fingers||Absent||Absent||Absent||Absent||Absent||Present, rudimentary|
|Webbing between toes||Webbed/extends beyond 3rd subarticular tubercle||No webbing||Webbed/barely reaching the 3rd subarticular tubercle||Webbed/reaching above 2nd subartcular tubercle||Webbing reaching beyond 3rd subarticular tubercle||Rudimentary|
|Dorsoterminal groove on fourth toe disc||Present, cover rounded distally||Present, cover bifurcate distally||Present, cover notched distally||Present, cover rounded distally||Absent||Absent|
|Subarticular tubercles||Prominent, oval,||Prominent, rounded||Prominent, oval||Prominent, oval||Prominent, oval||Primitive, glandular|
|Toe discs||Well developed||Weakly developed||Well developed||Well developed||Well developed||Triangular shaped|
|Coloration||Dorsum uniform dark gray with light gray patches||Dorsum tan without prominent patterns, scattered minute white spots on lateral side||Uniform reddish-brown||Light brownish-gray||Grayish brown with yellow patches||Brown, with bluish spots that are prominent on the lateral side|
|Subocular gland (proposed by Biju et al., 2011)||Present||Present||Present||Present||Present||Absent|
|Tarsal fold||Tarsal fold present||Tarsal fold present||Tarsal fold present||Tarsal fold present||Tarsal fold present||Absent|
|Black or bluish-black liver—visible on the ventral side through skin in life||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes||No|
|Ridge extending from the lip over the tip of the snout to between the nostrils||Present||Absent||Present||Present||Present||Absent|
Astrobatrachus differs from Nyctibatrachus in lacking rugose or wrinkled skin with longitudinal folds, having a distinct tympanum and canthus rostralis, lacking a subocular gland, having widely spaced nasals, having a long ridge of vomerine teeth, having separate anterior and posterior portions of the vomer with the latter fused to the neopalatine, lacking a forked omosternum, lacking femoral glands, lacking a prominent dorsal crest on the ilium, lacking both a tarsal fold and webbed pedal phalanges, lacking a rhomboidal pupil (Biju et al., 2011; Chandramouli & Dutta, 2015). Similar to Nyctibatrachus, Astrobatrachus lacks a median lingual papilla (present in some Nyctibatrachus), lacks a lateral line system as an adult, and has a second finger longer than the first finger and indistinct subarticular tubercles.
The skeleton of Astrobatrachus is also distinguishable from genera of Micrixalidae (Micrixalus) and Ranixalidae (Indirana, Walkerana). Astrobatrachus differs from Micrixalus by having vomerine teeth and a posterior portion of the vomer, and lacking T- or Y-shaped terminal phalanges (Dubois, 1986), but is similar by having widely spaced nasals, an unforked omosternum, and thin, straight clavicles. Astrobatrachus differs from Indirana by having widely spaced nasals, having a separate posterior vomer fused to the neopalatine, lacking a T- and Y-shaped terminal phalanges, but is similar by having an unforked omosternum, and thin, straight clavicles. Astrobatrachus differs from Walkerana by having widely spaced nasals, a separate posterior vomer fused to the neopalatine, a clavicle (absent in Walkerana), a well-defined sternum, and lacking Y-shaped terminal phalanges, but is similar by having an unforked omosternum.
Habits and habitat
The new species is nocturnal and found below decayed leaf litter within montane forests in the vicinity of water. One individual was caught moving in a grassland adjoining the forest tract (Fig. 7). On the forest floor, where most individuals were sampled, they hid under leaf litter when disturbed. Because individuals were secretive and difficult to spot, sampling involved an intensive search of the forest floor. Individuals were found to be shy of torch light and upon disturbance, made quick hopping movements to hide. No individuals were found exposed during the night during either rainy or non-rainy periods. As a general observation, most sympatric anurans in the region usually emerge in the dark and call during the rain or post rain seasons. Leaf-litter dwelling and habitat distinguishes A. kurichiyana from many species of Nyctibatrachus that are torrential frogs and prefer to live in water or next to perennial streams (Biju et al., 2011). While its terrestrial habits are somewhat similar to some small-bodied Nyctibatrachus species (see Garg et al., 2017), the new lineage differs strongly from the two Lankanectes species which are aquatic (Senevirathne et al., 2018).
All known populations of this species occur in Kurichiyarmala on the Wayanad Plateau, in the WG Escarpment (Fig. 1). The geographical range of Nyctibatrachinae, widespread across the WG, overlaps with Astrobatrachinae (Fig. 1). However, both lineages have a disjunct distribution with respect to Lankanectinae, which is restricted to the mountains of Sri Lanka (Fig. 1). The new species occurs in syntopy and in broad sympatry with Nyctibatrachus grandis, N. minimus, N. vrijeuni, and N. kempholeyensis.
From ‘Kurichiyana,’ a local tribal community residing near the type locality and currently known geographic range of the species. Species epithet is treated as a noun in apposition to the generic name. We suggest the common English name of the Starry Dwarf Frog.
Based on the lack of information on the abundance of the species, and inadequate data on the geographical range of the lineages, using the IUCN Red List criteria, we suggest A. kurichiyana be assigned to the Data Deficient category.
Here, we report a new, deeply divergent, monotypic lineage, recognized as a new subfamily Astrobatrachinae within Nyctibatrachidae, and a new genus and species A. kurichiyana. Since this lineage forms a well-supported clade with Nyctibatrachinae and Lankanectinae, but is highly divergent both morphologically, including osteology, and genetically, we erect a new subfamily—Astrobatrachinae—endemic to the WG of Peninsular India. A sister relationship between Nyctibatrachus and Lankanectes has long been supported by molecular phylogenetic analyses (Vences et al., 2000; Roelants, Jiang & Bossuyt, 2004; van der Meijden, Vences & Meyer, 2004; Delorme et al., 2004; Bossuyt et al., 2006). However, with the addition of this new lineage, the relationship among the three subfamilies becomes uncertain. While we place Astrobatrachinae as a subfamily in Nyctibatrachidae as a matter of taxonomic conservatism, we note that the ancient divergence and lack of unifying morphological synapomorphies may support recognition of Astrobatrachidae as a distinct family in the future.
The relationships of Nyctibatrachidae with other WG endemic families such as Micrixalidae and Ranixalidae have also been unstable across analyses, typically with low support. Sometimes Micrixalidae and Ranixalidae are sister lineages (Roelants, Jiang & Bossuyt, 2004; Bossuyt et al., 2006), sometimes Micrixalidae and Nyctibatrachidae are (Roelants et al., 2007), and sometimes none of these forms a clade (Frost et al., 2006; Pyron & Wiens, 2011). Bossuyt & Milinkovitch (2000, 2001) and later Roelants, Jiang & Bossuyt (2004) provided the first indication that these three natatanuran families may be among the earliest diverging in a larger clade of Malagasy and Asian families.
Recently, Yuan et al. (2018) published a well-supported phylogenomic analysis in which Ranixalidae and Nyctibatrachidae were found to form a clade sister to other Asian and Malagasy natatanurans: Ranidae, Rhacophoridae, Mantellidae, Ceratobatrachidae, and Dicroglossidae. At present, there are no clear morphological synapomorphies supporting the monophyly of Nyctibatrachidae with respect to other natatanurans. However, this is in part due to the lack of a clear phylogenetic context for the relationships of this family. A robust phylogenomic analysis containing all of the natatanuran families, including the three endemic WG families, would help to then make comparisons among families to determine distinguishing characteristics of Nyctibatrachidae within a subclade.
Under our new arrangement, Nyctibatrachidae is a diverse clade containing three divergent subfamilies each with unique morphology and ecology. More than two-thirds of the recognized nyctibatrachid species have been described in the past two decades (25 of 36 in Nyctibatrachus Boulenger, 1882, and one of two in Lankanectes Dubois & Ohler, 2001). Similarly, two other natatanuran families endemic to the WG have also seen many new species described during this time (8 of 14 species of Indirana Laurent, 1986, family Ranixalidae; 14 of 24 species of Micrixalus Boulenger, 1888, family Micrixalidae).
The genus Nyctibatrachus contains predominantly torrent-dwelling species (Biju et al., 2011; Garg et al., 2017). The Sri Lankan Lankanectes is almost entirely aquatic, but resides in slower-moving streams (Delorme et al., 2004; Senevirathne et al., 2018). The only known species of Astrobatrachus comprises entirely terrestrial forest-dwellers that prefer leaf-litter habitats. Like Astrobatrachus, a few species such as N. minimus (discovered in the same hill range as A. kurichiyana) are occasional litter-dwellers (Biju et al., 2007; Garg et al., 2017). However, A. kurichiyana is restricted to forest floor litter, unlike most syntopic nyctibatrachids. No information is yet available on the larval biology or reproductive modes of Astrobatrachus.
Ancient lineages: signatures of a tropical mountain refuge
The discovery of this lineage adds to the growing list of higher taxa endemic to the WG including Beddomixalus Abraham, Pyron, Ansil, Zachariah, and Zachariah, 2013; Ghatixalus Biju, Roelants, and Bossuyt, 2008; Ghatophryne Biju, Van Bocxlaer, Giri, Loader, and Bossuyt, 2009; Indirana; Melanobatrachus Beddome, 1878; Mercurana Abraham, Pyron, Ansil, Zachariah, and Zachariah, 2013; Micrixalus; Nasikabatrachus Biju & Bossuyt, 2003; Nyctibatrachus; Pedostibes Günther, 1876; Walkerana Dhanaukar, Modak, Krutha, Nameer, Padhye, and Molur, 2016; and Xanthophryne Biju, Van Bocxlaer, Giri, Loader, and Bossuyt, 2009 (see Biju, Roelants & Bossuyt, 2008; Biju et al., 2009; Abraham et al., 2013; Dahanukar et al., 2016). Many of these lineages—except Indirana, Nyctibatrachus and Micrixalus—are also relatively depauperate, having only one or two species. In contrast, a number of their close relatives, which originated within a similar time period, are species rich (e.g., Nyctibatrachus >30 species) which suggests either the failure of some lineages to diversify, incomplete sampling, or extinctions over time. At this juncture, our study and other extensive surveys exclude poor sampling as a cause. The peculiar mixture of hyperdiverse radiations such as Pseudophilautus Laurent 1943 and Raorchestes Biju, Shouche, Dubois, Dutta, and Bossuyt, 2010 (see Meegaskumbura et al., 2002; Vijayakumar et al., 2016) along with the numerous ancient and species-poor microendemics remains an unexplained evolutionary phenomenon.
Barring Xanthophryne, a lineage distributed in the northern plateau of the WG, all the recently recognized species poor genera, two of the sub-families (Astrobatrachinae and Lankanectinae) and the family Nasikabatrachidae have narrow ranges and are restricted to different massifs in the southern and central latitudes of the Escarpment and Sri Lanka. The southern regions of the WG (and Sri Lanka) have long been considered ancient climatic refuges (Mani, 1974), and recent discoveries of ancient lineages from these southern massifs underscores their evolutionary significance. Recent palynological research has indicated presence of a tropical rainforest refugium in the lowlands of the southern WG (Prasad et al., 2009) but the extent and location of the proposed refugia in these southern regions is unclear. Age estimates of the MRCA suggest that lineages range from the Late Cretaceous to Miocene. The discovery of this new lineage provides further impetus towards testing alternative hypotheses driving endemism and diversification in clades in this biodiversity hotspot.
Astrobatrachus kurichiyana is distributed at high elevations (1,300–1,400 m) of a small massif in the WG escarpment (Fig. 1). Its distribution needs to be assessed in the poorly explored adjoining massifs Vellarimala (Camel’s Hump) and Banasuramala to further confirm its microendemic status. While we are not aware of imminent threats to this ancient lineage, additional surveys are needed to quantify its geographical range, population density and habitat specificity to determine if conservation measures are required. Considering its age and the possibility of a narrow range, and its location outside protected areas, the significance of reserve forest tracts in the WG in housing evolutionary novelties needs to be highlighted. Frequent discoveries of older lineages from the southern and central massifs of the WG suggest that additional intensive surveys in these massifs are bound to uncover more lineages and advance our understanding of the historical biogeography of this ancient landmass.