Growth and feeding of deep-sea coral Lophelia pertusa from the California margin under simulated ocean acidification conditions

View article
Aquatic Biology

Main article text

 

Introduction

Material and Methods

Sample collection

Seawater chemistry at the collection site

Experimental set-up and seawater chemistry manipulation

Physiological measurements

Net Calcification

Feeding rates

Data analysis

Results

Carbonate chemistry and coral distribution in the in-situ collection

Experimental conditions

Calcification rates

Feeding rates

Discussion

Conclusions

Supplemental Information

Buoyant-weight data points for the different treatments

Time 1 corresponds to the initial time when the first B-W measurement was made. Time 2 correspons to the final time measurement. It is provided in the table the raw buoyant-weight value as well as the standardize Dry weight value, which is the one taken into consideration for the analysis.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5671/supp-1

Capture rate data points for the different treatments

Each single entry corresponds to an individual fragment from the different tanks and treatment exposures. In this table, raw values for the initial Artemia density and final Artemia used to calculate the delta. Standardize values are provided as numbers of Artemia per polyp per hour

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5671/supp-2

Values for pHT during the experimental trial

Each dot corresponds to the average pHT taken per day. Open circles correspond to the obtained pHT in the acidified conditions and closed circles correspond to the pHT in the non-acidified conditions

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5671/supp-3

Aragonite saturation during the experimental trial

Each data point indicates a discrete value of the aragonite saturation at each interval point. Black dots indicate samples collected in the non-acidified “favorable condition” treatment, while white dots indicate samples collected in the acidified “unfavorable condition” treatment. Aragonite saturation was obtained from the pHT and the AT and computed in CO2calc.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5671/supp-4

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Erik Cordes is an Academic Editor for PeerJ. Leslie Wickes was employed by JHT, Inc. at the time of the sample collection, and now is the owner and sole operator of Thrive Blue LLC.

Author Contributions

Carlos E. Gómez conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Leslie Wickes conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, in-situ carbonate chemistry analysis.

Dan Deegan performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Peter J. Etnoyer and Erik E. Cordes conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Research was conducted under permit CINMS-2015-002 issued Feb 4, 2015 by NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, in support of the project “Climate Vulnerability Assessment for Deep-Sea Coral Ecosystems in California”.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are provided in the Supplemental Files.

Funding

The experimental part of this study was supported by NSF BIO-OCE grant #1220478 to Erik E. Cordes. Carlos E. Gómez was supported by a doctoral Fulbright –Colciencias scholarship program. Funding for Leslie Wickes was provided by a NOAA Seagrant Fellowship to College of Charleston and scholarship from PADI Foundation. Cold water aquaria facilities were constructed at NOAA Deep Coral Ecology lab in Charleston, SC under support for a Research Fellowship from Schmidt Ocean Institute to Dr. Peter Etnoyer. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

34 Citations 4,607 Views 884 Downloads

Your institution may have Open Access funds available for qualifying authors. See if you qualify

Publish for free

Comment on Articles or Preprints and we'll waive your author fee
Learn more

Five new journals in Chemistry

Free to publish • Peer-reviewed • From PeerJ
Find out more