#openaccess reality
"...A recent large-scale study [https://t.co/BdqYMBvUO6] estimates 18% more citations on average than ‘closed’ research." https://t.co/3NmSFNyUWG
Myth 1: Publishing #openaccess benefits others but not the author
The reality is, "...A recent large-scale study [https://t.co/jeqGDr6jfU] estimates 18% more citations on average than ‘closed’ research." https://t.co/axR7bw5VHh
If your #OAweek slide deck feels like its missing something, go ahead and read this 2018 "State of OA" paper on @thePeerJ by @researchremix et al. https://t.co/Ko8ou3t6Cv Useful breakdown of OA types (green, gold, hybrid, bronze) and evidence of the OA Citation Advantage
Åpen tilgang er ikke like vanlig i alle fagfelt. Piwowar et al. (2018) har analysert publiseringsverden og funnet at biomedisin og matematikk publiserer langt mer åpent enn for eksempel kjemi og ingeniørfag. Men hvorfor? https://t.co/FtGScuWVq5 #OpenAccessWeek https://t.co/8Vs00BH29G
@ZenPublisher According to Piwowar et al somewhere between ~5-12%, but this is the share of all articles. Embargoes mean that most Green versions are posted months after the VoR is published. Piwowar paper is here https://t.co/7YwNIOjMIB
@Dmitri145 @glitterandtwang @mraversion @pubreform @Protohedgehog @unpaywall yup, definitely fewer 25+ year old articles... but some :)
OA by publication date: https://t.co/G9o5YnYHW8