https://t.co/sgrKwvxxSX suggests recall is 77% but this excludes those found on RG, personal sites etc. Wonder what recall rate one would get if those included. also paper is aging lots of changes since
This is a great paper on the state of open access that I somehow missed last year: https://t.co/wFz7cS6APy
Key finding: if you want to read a paper today, there's about a 50/50 chance it will be open access.
That's pretty neat :) https://t.co/9ezaAzzU7t
@weequipped So much to consider.... Lewis 2018 (https://t.co/5znQyMnR2K) does a nice job comparing OACA studies. The conclusion of Piwowar and Priem 2018 describes some of the OACA confounding variables to consider: https://t.co/YsoXeEbSkH. For now, maybe think 18% OACA but with an asterisk?
. We estimate that at least 28% of the scholarly literature is OA (19M in total) and that this proportion is growing, driven particularly by growth in Gold and Hybrid. https://t.co/Kh9LfEbWpq via @thePeerJ
The amazing @researchremix @jasonpriem et al of the awesome @unpaywall produced a groundbreaking study on gold, green and bronze open access recently in @thePeerJ https://t.co/nIkagEpl7b