When discussing #PlanS, please keep in mind that we don‘t have a definitive #OpenAccess terminology. So please define your usage, esp. of „gold“.
I recommend @researchremix‘s et al. terminology (by which „platinum“ would be a subset of „gold“) https://t.co/pwdm8XvQPg
Tässä artikkelissa on hyvä laaja katsaus Open Access -julkaisemisen nykytilanteeseen: https://t.co/ceNZw66WO5
#avointiede
#avoinjulkaiseminen
Suomen OA julkaisemisen kysymyksistä keskustellaan 2.10. - ilmoittaudu mukaan:
https://t.co/7xMhENvrtD https://t.co/TWGzg31nfn
@miguelnavasf @waltcrawford @StephenPinfield @BMittermaier @nrobinsongarcia @petersuber @lluisanglada @abadal @mikaellaakso @jalonsoarevalo @EIFLnet @unpaywall @EU_Commission It strikes me that if we take the definition of OA espoused by @miguelnavasf as THE definition of OA then we have to strike out both bronze and green OA, and so the number of articles that are open access today is much smaller than most say it is. https://t.co/eWPCedWONP https://t.co/WVqvQfZaCv
@miguelnavasf @StephenPinfield @BMittermaier @nrobinsongarcia @petersuber @lluisanglada @abadal @mikaellaakso @jalonsoarevalo @EIFLnet @unpaywall @EU_Commission The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles [I am wondering if Bronze OA meets the criterion of sustainable that @StephenPinfield refers to]. https://t.co/eWPCedWONP https://t.co/xstJWc2rJE
@OpenScienceOrg @WikiResearch @Wikipedia @unpaywall @Wikimedia @Impactstory @eLifeInnovation @mad_astronaut The evolution over time has two components: the prevalence of #openaccess in works published in a given time and the likelihood for editors to cite OA works in a given time (variant of the OA citation advantage?). https://t.co/9o0d4izuLm gives an idea.
#scholcomm article by Piwowar et al in PeerJ. cited by @JevinWest #bibsymp18
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles https://t.co/Ak6fiZqUez https://t.co/tVvNhKoVj9