The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research

RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step, is to remove thresholds of statistical significance like p = 0.05. https://t.co/7vnYDeLVss
RT @vamrhein: @Quasilocal @OliverFaude @Neuro_Skeptic @DFanDaBiasedMan "The average truth often does not make it to the paper and the publi…
@Quasilocal @OliverFaude @Neuro_Skeptic @DFanDaBiasedMan "The average truth often does not make it to the paper and the public, and much of our attention is attracted by exaggerated results." https://t.co/tiUcLt2aBI https://t.co/Vpmi0Btvd3
RT @vamrhein: @SGruninger 3/ However, as we explain in the attached paper, applying significance thresholds makes cumulative knowledge unre…
@SGruninger 3/ However, as we explain in the attached paper, applying significance thresholds makes cumulative knowledge unreliable. I think that applying any sort of "inferential thresholds" on single studies introduces some sort of bias. https://t.co/Q167s9yTBH
RT @ColbySerpa: It has been argued that the correct use of p-values is to guide behavior, or suggest a direction of research, not to classi…
RT @ColbySerpa: It has been argued that the correct use of p-values is to guide behavior, or suggest a direction of research, not to classi…
It has been argued that the correct use of p-values is to guide behavior, or suggest a direction of research, not to classify results. “A statistically significant result may not be easy to reproduce.” https://t.co/hzTee0hMqQ
2743 days ago
"significance testing appears like a sort of gambling" The earth is flat (p>0.05) https://t.co/QVbyFBLKtY via @thePeerJ
@NickWolfinger @PsychRabble I found this to be profitable reading on the same subject. cc:@thePeerJ https://t.co/KpPuP4scz1
RT @vamrhein: My 'The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research' article was published 1 ye…
My 'The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research' article was published 1 year ago today in #OpenAccess journal @thePeerJ https://t.co/Q167s9yTBH
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research [PeerJ] https://t.co/igc2qjF0iC
The earth is flat (p>0.05) https://t.co/o9JZkm069D via @thePeerJ
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research > https://t.co/zb47thMQp9
2783 days ago
Crisis de replicación o valores de significación que apenas significan nada. "los valores-p deben interpretarse como medidas graduales de solidez de la evidencia frente a la hipótesis nula" Ronald Fisher. #Psicología #Ciencia #Conocimiento https://t.co/IcTX5spz2C vía @thePeerJ
@lutzbornmann Interesting blogpost and the associated publication "The earth is flat (p > 0.05)" https://t.co/mnfOc5x78Y
@HarryDCrane Arbitrary thresholds are arguably part of the reproducibility problem. For instance this article: [I am not an author of this article] https://t.co/Sl4FvxlMBF
2852 days ago
RT @AndrewNoymer: @VinayPrasad82 I also enjoyed reading this one from @thePeerJ : https://t.co/Sl4FvxDo0f
@VinayPrasad82 I also enjoyed reading this one from @thePeerJ : https://t.co/Sl4FvxDo0f
2881 days ago
A long read but a worthwhile one. Be wary of big claims in the press...The earth is flat (p>0.05) https://t.co/yhyxbA9shG
@ivanferrreira @nature @the_Node also worth expanding the issue into this aswell: The earth is flat (p>0.05) https://t.co/8R7nDj5YeN via @thePeerJ
@ivanferrreira @nature @the_Node also worth expanding the issue into this aswell: The earth is flat (p>0.05) https://t.co/8R7nDj5YeN via @thePeerJ
2919 days ago
RT @FBpsy: La Tierra es plana (p > 0.05). Parte de la culpa de la crisis de replicación la tiene el pensamiento dicotómico: ¿significativo…