The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research

2574 days ago
RT @vamrhein: Quite often, significance testing appears like a sort of gambling. And we may have become somewhat addicted to this game—it i…
RT @vamrhein: Quite often, significance testing appears like a sort of gambling. And we may have become somewhat addicted to this game—it i…
RT @vamrhein: Quite often, significance testing appears like a sort of gambling. And we may have become somewhat addicted to this game—it i…
RT @vamrhein: Quite often, significance testing appears like a sort of gambling. And we may have become somewhat addicted to this game—it i…
Quite often, significance testing appears like a sort of gambling. And we may have become somewhat addicted to this game—it is satisfying to feed data into the machine and find out whether the right variables have turned significant. https://t.co/tk6oWZqA4T
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
RT @vamrhein: Whenever we use effect sizes, confidence intervals, AIC, posteriors, Bayes factors, likelihood ratios, or false discovery rat…
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
2575 days ago
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
RT @vamrhein: Whenever we use effect sizes, confidence intervals, AIC, posteriors, Bayes factors, likelihood ratios, or false discovery rat…
RT @vamrhein: Whenever we use effect sizes, confidence intervals, AIC, posteriors, Bayes factors, likelihood ratios, or false discovery rat…
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
2575 days ago
RT @vamrhein: Whenever we use effect sizes, confidence intervals, AIC, posteriors, Bayes factors, likelihood ratios, or false discovery rat…
RT @vamrhein: Whenever we use effect sizes, confidence intervals, AIC, posteriors, Bayes factors, likelihood ratios, or false discovery rat…
RT @vamrhein: Whenever we use effect sizes, confidence intervals, AIC, posteriors, Bayes factors, likelihood ratios, or false discovery rat…
Whenever we use effect sizes, confidence intervals, AIC, posteriors, Bayes factors, likelihood ratios, or false discovery rates in decision heuristics for interpreting selected results, we create biases and invalidate the answers we give to our questions. https://t.co/PvNvK2WOu2
2575 days ago
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
2575 days ago
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
2576 days ago
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…
RT @vamrhein: One of the smallest incremental steps to address statistical issues of replicability, and at the same time a most urgent step…