The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research

2917 days ago
La Tierra es plana (p > 0.05). Parte de la culpa de la crisis de replicación la tiene el pensamiento dicotómico: ¿significativo o no significativo? https://t.co/VhYG6wZCbG
2935 days ago
RT @curtrice: So much to be done to make science more sound: ""The earth is flat (p>0.05)" "The widespread use of ‘statistical significance…
RT @curtrice: So much to be done to make science more sound: ""The earth is flat (p>0.05)" "The widespread use of ‘statistical significance…
2936 days ago
So much to be done to make science more sound: ""The earth is flat (p>0.05)" "The widespread use of ‘statistical significance’ as a license for making a claim of a scientific finding leads to considerable distortion of the scientific process" https://t.co/Afn9Sflel8
“Conclusions must ultimately be left to the scientific intuition of the experimenter and his public.” - Boring 1919 https://t.co/2JIvrC4mb0
@zombideferro @fedenogueira25 Sí, pero fijate todo el debate que hay: https://t.co/3v7R3YJvmc o directamente https://t.co/0cob9uMeSW
RT @thePeerJ: How confusion about interpretation of larger p-values can be traced back to historical statistics disputes https://t.co/LYl6K…
RT @thePeerJ: How confusion about interpretation of larger p-values can be traced back to historical statistics disputes https://t.co/LYl6K…
3024 days ago
RT @thePeerJ: How confusion about interpretation of larger p-values can be traced back to historical statistics disputes https://t.co/LYl6K…
RT @thePeerJ: How confusion about interpretation of larger p-values can be traced back to historical statistics disputes https://t.co/LYl6K…
3024 days ago
RT @thePeerJ: How confusion about interpretation of larger p-values can be traced back to historical statistics disputes https://t.co/LYl6K…
How confusion about interpretation of larger p-values can be traced back to historical statistics disputes https://t.co/LYl6KCZRGC
RT @thePeerJ: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/gss0oStlr5 #scienc…
3025 days ago
RT @thePeerJ: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/gss0oStlr5 #scienc…
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/gss0oStlr5 #sciencepolicy https://t.co/GJWr2zDz3w
@edu_gargar Thanks! Here are two full papers: https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm https://t.co/v0QS3bxTYF
3034 days ago
@alta_schutte @FZMarques (2/3) Strong arguments for using p-values as graded evidence here: https://t.co/QmbqVfcgEH
RT @thePeerJ: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/kE7tMoxsQC https:/…
RT @thePeerJ: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/kE7tMoxsQC https:/…
null hypothesis": https://t.co/3goAazFFX0 Pintaza de artículo. Visto en el perfil de @Alex4_8 .
RT @thePeerJ: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/kE7tMoxsQC https:/…
RT @thePeerJ: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/kE7tMoxsQC https:/…
RT @thePeerJ: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/kE7tMoxsQC https:/…
RT @thePeerJ: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/kE7tMoxsQC https:/…
RT @thePeerJ: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/kE7tMoxsQC https:/…