Dinosaur teeth from the Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation of western Liaoning, China

View article
Paleontology and Evolutionary Science

Introduction

The Jehol Biota represents a Mesozoic terrestrial Lagerstätte, with its known fossil localities mainly distributed in the Lower Cretaceous of western Liaoning, northern Hebei, and southeastern Inner Mongolia in northeastern China (Pan et al., 2013; Zhou, 2014; Xu et al., 2020). This biota is renowned for yielding numerous many exceptionally well-preserved two-dimensional and three-dimensional dinosaur fossils, which are found in ascending stratigraphic order within the Dabeigou, Yixian, and Jiufotang formations (e.g.Sereno et al., 1988; Xu et al., 2002; Xing et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2022; Yu et al., 2024). Notably, three-dimensionally preserved dinosaur fossils have been discovered at the Beipiao and Xidayingzi sites within the Lujiatun Bed of the Yixian Formation, as well as at the Huanghuagou (Shijianggou) site in the Huanghuagou Bed of the Jiufotang Formation (Chang et al., 2003; Duan et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2022). Recently, two dinosaur teeth were recovered from a newly identified site of three-dimensionally preserved dinosaur fossils located in Shangshuiquan Village, Lianhe Town, Longcheng District, Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province of the Jiufotang Formation of the Jehol Biota. This discovery expands the known distribution of three-dimensionally preserved dinosaur fossil sites of this biota. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive description of the two teeth and to explore their taxonomic implications.

Specifically, one of the two teeth is attributed to a theropod, whose dental taxonomy is primarily established through morphological comparisons, phylogenetic analysis, machine learning, and discriminant analysis (e.g.Hendrickx et al., 2019; Hendrickx et al., 2024; Hendrickx, Tschopp & Ezcurra, 2020; Wills, Underwood & Barrett, 2021; Wills, Underwood & Barrett, 2023). It is important to clarify that this study exclusively employs morphological comparisons to analyze the theropod tooth, as it only preserves the mesial half and lacks the diagnostic features characteristic of specific theropod subgroups.

Geological Setting

The fossil site containing dinosaur teeth was discovered at Shangshuiquan Village (41°31′6″N, 120°16′1″E), Lianhe Town, Longcheng District, Chaoyang City, western Liaoning Province during our field expeditions (Fig. 1A). The Lianhe area geographically belongs to the Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation in the Dapingfang-Meileyingzi basin (Duan et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2009). The lithology of this section consists of a set of sedimentary rocks with a total thickness of 15.26 m. These sedimentary rocks are primarily composed of conglomerate and gravel-bearing sandstone, interbedded with gravel-bearing tuffaceous siltstone. Two distinct fossil layers have been identified, with layer 1 situated directly beneath layer 2, approximately 8.85 m apart (Fig. 1B). All specimens are preserved within the gravel-bearing tuffaceous siltstone (Figs. 1C and 1D), with a titanosauriform tooth found in fossil layer 1 and a theropod tooth found in fossil layer 2.

The location (A), stratigraphic column (B), and corresponding photographs (C, D) of the Early Cretaceous Shangshuaiquan site.

Figure 1: The location (A), stratigraphic column (B), and corresponding photographs (C, D) of the Early Cretaceous Shangshuaiquan site.

Materials & Methods

PMOL-ADt0006 (Fig. 2) and PMOL-ADt0007 (Fig. 3) are isolated teeth that likely represent shed teeth due to the short length of their preserved roots. These specimens were collected from the Jiufotang Formation of the Lower Cretaceous at Shangshuiquan Village, Lianhe Town, Longcheng District, Chaoyang City, western Liaoning Province, China (Fig. 1A), during our field expedition on April 26, 2024. They are housed in the Paleontological Museum of Liaoning (PMOL). In the description of PMOL-ADt0006, we adhere to the terminology and measurement methodology established by Hendrickx, Mateus & Araújo (2015). Measurements were conducted using the software ImageJ 1.54f.

Theropod tooth (PMOL-ADt0006) in lingual (A), distal (B), labial (C), apical (D), basal (E) and mesial (F) views; detail of the mesial denticles (G).

Figure 2: Theropod tooth (PMOL-ADt0006) in lingual (A), distal (B), labial (C), apical (D), basal (E) and mesial (F) views; detail of the mesial denticles (G).

Single red arrow marks the end of mesial carina. Abbreviations: ce, cervix; co, crown; de, denticle; mca, mesial carina; pc, pulp cavity; ro, root; AL, apical length; CBW, crown base width; DLAT, dentine thickness labially; DLIT, dentine thickness lingually; MCW, mid-crown width; MDE, mesial denticle extension; MDL, mesial denticle length; MDW, mesial denticle width; MSL, mesial serrated carina length. Scale bars represent 10 mm (A–F) and one mm (G).
Titanosauriform tooth (PMOL-ADt0007) in labial (A), mesial (B), lingual (C), apical (D), basal (E) and distal (F) views; detail of the wrinkled enamel (G).

Figure 3: Titanosauriform tooth (PMOL-ADt0007) in labial (A), mesial (B), lingual (C), apical (D), basal (E) and distal (F) views; detail of the wrinkled enamel (G).

Abbreviations: awf, apical wear facet; c, cingulum; dc?, dentical calculus?; dlag, distal labial groove; dlig, distal lingual groove; dwf, distal wear facet; lib, lingual bulge; mlig, mesial lingual groove; pc,pulp cavity; we, wrinkled enamel; MCH, maximum crown height; MMCD, maximum mesiodistal crown diameter; MMRD, maximum mesiodistal root diameter; MLCD, maximum labiolingual crown diameter; MLRD, maximum labiolingual root diameter. Scale bars represent five mm (A–F) and one mm (G).

To eliminate the matrix, a steel needle was utilized to mechanically prepare the specimens PMOL-ADt0006 and PMOL-ADt0007 under a Leica S6 microscope. Subsequently, the specimens were photographed using a three-dimensional super microscopy system (Olympus DSX1000), which is housed in PMOL.

Results

Systematic paleontology

Dinosauria Owen, 1842
Saurischia Seeley, 1887
Theropoda Marsh, 1881
Theropoda indet.

Material—One isolated tooth: PMOL-ADt0006 (Fig. 2).

Description

PMOL-ADt0006 represents an incomplete tooth, retaining primarily the mesial half (Fig. 2). The distal half, along with the crown apex and the apical portion of the root, is missing. The tooth exhibits a distal curvature (Figs. 2A and 2C) and is slightly labiolingually compressed. Notably, the enamel is not preserved in the area surrounding the mesial carina, and it appears to be thin and smooth.

The mid-crown width is narrower than the crown base width (Table 1). There is an absence of crown ornamentation. The crown does not exhibit a constriction at the cervix. The labial surface is slightly convex, while the lingual surface is relatively flat. The mesial edge of the crown curves apically from the base. The mesial carina is eroded and is missing its apical portion. It is not extending to the cervix, terminating basally at approximately two-thirds of the crown height (Figs. 2A and 2F). The mesial carina is denticulated and exhibits a slight twist towards the lingual side (Figs. 2A, 2D and 2F).

The denticles are poorly preserved with the enamel lost on the mesial carina (Fig. 2G). Consequently, data pertaining to their shape, symmetry, and orientation remain unavailable. A total of approximately 72 mesial denticles have been preserved. The mesial denticle densities in the most apical crown are not available; however, the mesial denticle densities in the middle and basal crowns are 21 denticles per five mm and 22 denticles per five mm, respectively. The average mesial denticle density is calculated to be 19.5 per five mm. The denticles decrease in size from the apical to the basal (Fig. 2G). The lengths of a mesial denticle at the apical, middle, and basal crowns are 0.34 mm, 0.27 mm, and 0.16 mm, respectively, while the widths at these corresponding locations are 0.30 mm, 0.21 mm, and 0.16 mm, respectively.

In distal view, the pulp cavity is clearly observable and exhibits a distal curvature. The pulp cavity is elongated and elliptical above the cervix in distal view (Fig. 2B). It gradually widens below the cervix, followed by an abrupt expansion and seems semi-oval in basal view (Fig. 2E). The thickness of the dentine on the labial side is slightly greater than that on the lingual side (Table 1).

Sauropoda Marsh, 1878
Titanosauriformes Salgado, Coria & Calvo, 1997
Titanosauriformes indet.

Material—One isolated tooth: PMOL-ADt0007 (Fig. 3).

Description

PMOL-ADt0007 preserves a nearly complete tooth, with the exception of the most apical portion of its root (Fig. 3). The tooth lacks denticles. The maximum mesiodistal diameter of the crown is not significantly greater than that of the root (Table 2). The mesial and distal margins of the tooth extend slightly mesially and distally, respectively, before converging apically (Figs. 3A and 3C). The lingual margin of the tooth is straight in the basal half and becomes oblique labially in the apical half, while the labial margin exhibits a slight curvature towards the lingual side (Figs. 3B and 3F). There is no evidence of overlap with other teeth, as no overlapping facets are present on this specimen. Additionally, two materials resembling dentical calculus are observed on the tooth. One material is affixed to the apicomesial margin of the crown (Fig. 3B), while the other is attached to the middle section of the lingual surface of the crown (Fig. 3C). The coloration of these materials is a pale yellow. Although further analysis of these unusual materials is warranted, such an investigation is beyond the scope of the present study.

The crown exhibits an expanded apex and a cylindrical base, indicating that PMOL-ADt0007 can be classified as a compressed cone-chisel-like tooth, consistent with the established classification of sauropod teeth (Calvo, 1994; Mocho et al., 2017; Bindellini & Sasso, 2021). In both labial and lingual views, the midsection of the crown is the widest. The crown displays asymmetry in labial or lingual views with a more convex apicodistal side and a nearly straight apicomesial side. The labial surface of the crown is convex. The mesial labial groove is absent, whereas the distal labial groove is present, as in some titanosauriform teeth (Bindellini & Sasso, 2021). In contrast, the labial grooves have been secondarily lost in diplodocoids, titanosaurians, and Mamenchisaurus sinocanadorum (Upchurch, 1998; Upchurch, Barrett & Dodson, 2004; Moore et al., 2023). The distal labial groove extends the full height of the crown. The enamel within this groove exhibits fine wrinkling, while the rest of the labial surface appears polished, likely as a result of continuous interaction with food or mechanical abrasion during fossilization. The wrinkled enamel is characterized by scale-like structures (Fig. 3G). A lingual concavity is present, which is subdivided into three components: a bulge and two lingual grooves. The bulge is located in the central section and is basally bordered by a cingulum (Fig. 3C). The distal lingual groove faces linguodistally, and is smaller than the mesial lingual groove, which faces nearly mesially. The cross-section of the apical half of the crown is irregularly D-shaped due to the presence of the lingual bulge and grooves, while the cross-section of the basal half of the crown is nearly circular. Additionally, both the root and pulp cavity are also nearly circular in cross-section (Fig. 3E).

The wear facet is classified as A1L1, following the classification proposed by Averianov & Sues (2017). The apical wear facet is lingually tilted, and the angle α (Averianov & Sues, 2017) is obtuse (Table 2). The facet is oval in shape, with the longest axis measuring 4.8 mm and the shortest axis measuring 2.5 mm. The distal wear facet faces mesiolingually, and extends basally for approximately half the height of the crown.

Discussion

PMOL-ADt0006 is labiolingually compressed, distally recurved and serrated, suggesting its classification as a theropod (Xu & Clark, 2008; Han et al., 2011; Hendrickx & Mateus, 2014; Yu et al., 2023). This tooth is classified as either a ziphodont or pachydont tooth due to its distal curvature and the absence of constriction at the cervix (Hendrickx, Mateus & Araújo, 2015). Additionally, it remains challenging to ascertain whether the specimen is a mesial or lateral tooth, considering PMOL-ADt0006’s incompleteness. To date, theropod clades recovered from the Jiufotang Formation include Tyrannosauroidea, Ornithomimosauria, and Microraptorinae (Xu, Zhou & Wang, 2000; Xu et al., 2003; He, Wang & Zhou, 2008; Ji, Ji & Zhang, 2009). PMOL-ADt0006 can be distinctly differentiated from both Ornithomimosauria and Microraptorinae, as it possesses a minimum crown height of 3.6 cm, whereas the crowns of Ornithomimosauria and Microraptorinae are smaller, measuring less than one cm and three cm, respectively (Hendrickx et al., 2019). Furthermore, PMOL-ADt0006 features a serrated crown, in contrast to the unserrated crowns characteristic of Ornithomimosauria (Hendrickx et al., 2019). In terms of size, PMOL-ADt0006 is comparable to the teeth of the proceratosaurid Sinotyrannus (Ji, Ji & Zhang, 2009; Brusatte et al., 2010), which is the only known tyrannosauroid from the Jiufotang Formation. It is improbable that PMOL-ADt0006 represents a lateral tooth of Sinotyrannus, as it exhibits 19.5 mesial denticles per five mm, whereas the mesial teeth of Sinotyrannus possess 15 or 16 mesial denticles (Ji, Ji & Zhang, 2009) per five mm. Unfortunately, detailed information regarding the mesial teeth of Sinotyrannus is lacking (Ji, Ji & Zhang, 2009). Despite this limitation, it is unlikely that PMOL-ADt0006 is a mesial tooth of Sinotyrannus, as it displays a slightly twisted mesial carina, whereas tyrannosauroids typically possess mesial teeth with a strongly mesial carina that extends onto the lingual surface (Hendrickx et al., 2019). Moreover, PMOL-ADt0006 does not exhibit the braided texture commonly found in Proceratosauridae (Hendrickx et al., 2019). The classification of PMOL-ADt0006 within theropods remains challenging due to the preservation of only the mesial half of the tooth.

Table 1:
Measurements (in mm) of the theropod tooth (PMOL-ADt0006) from Longcheng, Chaoyang, Liaoning.
Items PMOL-ADt0006
Total length 47.8
Crown height 36.0
Apical length 39.1
Mid-crown width 9.6
Crown base width 11.6
Mesial serrated carina length 20.6
Mesial denticle extension 14.8
Dentine thickness labially 5.8
Dentine thickness lingually 5.2
Root length 11.8
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.19013/table-1
Table 2:
Measurements (in mm) of the titanosauriform tooth (PMOL-ADt0007) from Longcheng, Chaoyang, Liaoning.
Items PMOL-ADt0007
Total length 18.0
Maximum crown height 12.0
Maximum mesiodistal crown diameter 7.2
Maximum labiolingual crown diameter 5.6
Maximum mesiodistal root diameter 6.2
Maximum labiolingual root diameter 5.9
SI 1.67
CI 0.78
α angle 58°
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.19013/table-2

Notes:

Abbreviations
CI

compression index (maximum labiolingual crown diameter divided by maximum mesiodistal diameter)

SI

slenderness index (maximum crown height divided by maximum mesiodistal diameter)

Additionally, as far as we know, the pulp cavity is only exposed in basal view, and its internal structure is little exposed within theropod teeth. PMOL-ADt0006 reveals new information of this structure in theropods. The pulp cavity exhibits a distal curvature. It progressively enlarges beneath the cervix, culminating in a sudden increase in diameter.

PMOL-ADt0007 exhibits a wrinkled enamel, an absence of denticles on the crown, a lingual concavity, a D-shaped mid-crown cross-section, and a labial groove. These traits are characteristic of eusauropods (Upchurch, 1998; Wilson & Sereno, 1998; Wilson, 2002; Upchurch, Barrett & Dodson, 2004). Consequently, it is reasonable to classify PMOL-ADt0007 within the clade Eusauropoda. The presence of wear facets, a feature commonly observed in eusauropods (Wilson, 2005a), further supports this classification. Within the eusauropods, PMOL-ADt0007 can be specifically assigned to Titanosauriformes based on a suite of characteristic features of this clade: the presence of labial and lingual grooves, a lingual bulge, and a slightly mesiodistally expanded apex (Upchurch, Barrett & Dodson, 2004; Mocho et al., 2017). It can be definitively excluded that PMOL-ADt0007 belongs to Titanosauria, as it possesses a SI value of 1.67, along with the labial groove and lingual concavity, whereas Titanosauria is characterized by a SI value exceeding 4.0 (Upchurch, 1998) and has secondarily lost both the labial grooves and the lingual concavity (Upchurch, Barrett & Dodson, 2004). It is noteworthy that PMOL-ADt0007 exhibits a minimum SI of 1.67 (Table 2), in contrast to the known early-diverging titanosauriforms, which possess the SI values ranging from 2.0 to 4.0 (Barrett et al., 2002; Mocho et al., 2017). However, the SI value for PMOL-ADt0007 may underestimate the original crown height due to the significant wear observed on its crown apex. Consequently, we classify PMOL-ADt0007 as a non-titanosaurian titanosauriform. This classification aligns with the observation that all sufficiently documented Cretaceous Asian sauropods are titanosauriforms (Barrett et al., 2002; Wilson, 2005b). In the Jehol Biota, the titanosauriform fossils comprise three genera along with several isolated teeth (Barrett & Wang, 2007; Wang et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2018; Mo et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2024). Among these three genera, only Liaoningtitan has been found to preserve teeth (Zhou et al., 2018). The specimen PMOL-ADt0007 exhibits distinct characteristics compared to the teeth of Liaoningtitan and the known isolated titanosauriform teeth, specifically in possessing both an apical wear facet and a distal wear facet (Barrett & Wang, 2007; Zhou et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2024).

In comparison to theropods and ornithischians, sauropods exhibit a more limited stratigraphical distribution within the Jehol Biota (Benton, 2023). Over the past eighteen years, sauropod fossils have been exclusively documented in the Yixian Formation of western Liaoning (Barrett & Wang, 2007; Wang et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2018; Mo et al., 2023) and southeastern Inner Mongolia (Zhang et al., 2024). The titanosauriform tooth described in this study represents the youngest fossil record of sauropods within the Jehol Biota.

By January 12, 2025, ten dinosaur species have been documented from the Jiufotang Formation (Sereno et al., 1988; Xu, Zhou & Wang, 2000; Czerkas & Yuan, 2002; Xu et al., 2003; You & Dodson, 2004; He, Wang & Zhou, 2008; Ji, Ji & Zhang, 2009; Gong et al., 2012; Han et al., 2014; Poust et al., 2020). These discoveries suggest the presence of theropods, including Tyrannosauroidea (Ji, Ji & Zhang, 2009), Ornithomimosauria (He, Wang & Zhou, 2008), and Microraptorinae (Xu, Zhou & Wang, 2000; Xu et al., 2003), as well as ornithischians such as Ankylosauria (Han et al., 2014) and Ceratopsia (Sereno et al., 1988) within the Jiufotang Formation. The current study reports two types of dinosaur teeth from the Jiufotang Formation of Longcheng, Chaoyang, western Liaoning, China, representing Theropoda and Titanosauriformes. The theropod tooth constitutes a distinct taxon, separate from previously recognized theropods. Additionally, the isolated titanosauriform tooth provides the first evidence of sauropod presence in this formation, indicating that skeletal fossils of sauropods may be recoverable from the Jiufotang Formation. These findings enhance the known dinosaur diversity in the Jiufotang Formation from ten taxa to 12; however, this remains significantly lower than the diversity observed in the Yixian Formation of the Jehol Biota, which comprises 39 species (Benton, 2023). Nevertheless, the discovery of these dinosaur teeth suggests that the Jiufotang Formation may still yield valuable insights into dinosaur diversity.

The Jehol Biota is renowned for its extensive collection of dinosaur fossils, both two-dimensionally and three-dimensionally preserved (e.g., Chang et al., 2003; Zhou, Barrett & Hilton, 2003; Xu & Norell, 2006; Xu et al., 2020). Among these, three-dimensionally preserved dinosaur fossils are of particular interest due to their capacity to retain significant biological information during fossilization. However, the number of fossil sites that yield three-dimensionally preserved dinosaur fossils is significantly lower compared to those that produce two-dimensionally preserved specimens within the Jehol Biota. To date, only three fossil sites have been identified that contain three-dimensional dinosaur fossils: the Beipiao and Xidayingzi sites of the Lujiatun Bed in the Yixian Formation, and the Huanghuagou (Shijianggou) site of the Huanghuagou Bed in the Jiufotang Formation (Chang et al., 2003; Duan et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2022). The recent discovery of a new site featuring three-dimensionally preserved dinosaur fossils in Shangshuiquan, Lianhe, Longcheng, Chaoyang, Liaoning, within the Jiufotang Formation, significantly expands the geographical distribution of three-dimensionally preserved dinosaur fossil sites in the Jehol Biota.

Conclusion

A theropod tooth and an early-diverging titanosauriform tooth have been identified from the Jiufotang Formation located in Shangshuiquan Village, Lianhe Town, Longcheng District, Chaoyang City, western Liaoning Province, China. This site is particularly significant due to the three-dimensionally preserved dinosaur fossils in the Jehol Biota. The theropod tooth represents a taxon that is distinct from Sinotyrannus, which is the only large theropod dinosaur from the Jiufotang Formation. The titanosauriform tooth constitutes the youngest sauropod fossils identified within the Jehol Biota. These two findings highlight the diversity of dinosaurs present in the Jiufotang Formation. The availability of more complete fossil skeletons is crucial for advancing research on the dinosaurs within this formation.

  Visitors   Views   Downloads