Study on the cultivation of seedlings using buds of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

View article
Plant Biology

Introduction

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is a well-known tuber crop consumed by approximately 1.3 billion people as a staple food (Stokstad, 2019). Potatoes are native to the Andes Mountains of South America, with an altitude of 2,000–4,000 m, where the environmental characteristics include short days, high light intensity, low temperatures and high relative humidity (Harris, 2012). After hundreds of years of domestication, this crop was primarily introduced into Europe in the late 1500s. It is currently being cultivated in multiple countries and regions between 65°N and 50°S (Camire, Kubow & Donnelly, 2009). This crop is also used as an important industrial raw material for the production of starch, ethanol and animal feed (Birch et al., 2012).

A potato tuber is a modified stolon that provides a rich source of nutrition due to its stored starch, protein, vitamins, and minerals (Aien et al., 2011; Hancock et al., 2014). It is an expanded stem with terminal buds and lateral buds, and the buds enter a dormant state after separating from the maternal tuber. Tuber formation begins with the inhibition of longitudinal growth at the end of the stolon, and then the terminal bud begins to expand due to cell division and cell expansion (Cutter, 1992). The formation of potato tubers generally depends upon favorable climatic conditions.

A number of different planting techniques have been introduced for obtaining suitable potato production. Among them, potato bud planting technology has yielded virus-free seeds with strong disease resistance characteristics at an early stage. When late blight occurs in the rainy season of July/August in the Northern Hemisphere, potato crops are being harvested or close to maturity (Luo & Jin, 1960). Breaking potato bud dormancy, raising seedlings in seedbeds, and transplanting seedlings into appropriate fields for rapid seed propagation could save up to 39.3% of seed potatoes (Wu, Zhou & Min, 2009; Li, 2014). When the seedling reaches a height of five cm in height, it bears a large number of fibrous roots and should be detached from the seed potato for transplanting, which could increase the reproduction coefficient of virus-free seed potato (Xiong, Liu & Ma, 2010).

The cultivation of potato bud seedlings is mainly achieved by seedling transplanting, which is primarily based on the cultivation of potato buds as seeds. The bud planting approach has the advantages of multiple and fast reproduction and guaranteed crop cultivation, and it has been used for the cultivation of traditional Chinese medicine crops (Yu et al., 1999; Wen, Li & Chen, 2000) and vegetable crops (Li, 1962). The potato bud planting method was introduced in the 1960s and has been evaluated in different provinces (Shanxi, Zhejiang, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Qinghai and other provinces) of China (Jiang, 1959). The growth of planted potato buds is accelerated in semihumid soil under a suitable temperature of 20–25 ° C. The length of seedlings after rapid germination can reach 3.5–10.5 cm in 8 days, and the survival rate of transplants is relatively high (Liu, 1962). When seedlings reach a 6–10 cm height and have 5–7 leaves, they are cut at the base and planted. The yield achieved with this method is higher than that with traditional direct seeding with buds (Zhang & Tian, 2012).

When the bud length of seed potato reaches 2.5 cm, crop production can increase by up to 89.4% compared to that with the conventional method of direct potato seeding (Lv & Jiang, 1992). The cultivation of potato seedlings reduces the occurrence of potato late blight disease and reduces the probability of plant degradation (Chen, 2014; Chen & Jiang, 2015). One study showed that much older seed tuber buds produce higher yields. Bud planting reduces the number of seed potatoes needed compared with that under direct planting (Liu et al., 1990). The traditional method of direct bud seeding yields 200–300 kg/667 m2 potatoes, but cultivation through the bud-seedling planting method requires only 40–50 kg/667 m2, i.e., nearly five times fewer seed potatoes (Li, 1982).

Vegetable seedlings are raised for vegetable cultivation (Wen & Li, 2001). Seedling cultivation is one of the fundamental measures for checking and improving the emergence rate and cultivating strong seedlings during vegetable production. It has numerous advantages, such as enhancing early vegetable maturity, increasing yield, and increasing economic income for farmers. At present, the protected cultivation of potato mainly involves the direct seeding of tubers, which has the crucial disadvantages of high seed consumption and a low reproduction coefficient (Fig. 1A). However, using potato buds for seedling cultivation can effectively reduce seed consumption, increase the reproduction coefficient and increase the overall efficiency of the crop. Nevertheless, there have been few reports on potato seedling cultivation through buds. The experiment reported here demonstrated the adaptability and feasibility of potato seedling cultivation using buds of different lengths in protected nutrient pots. We found that potato bud-seedling cultivation is conducive to early maturity and yield improvement.

Different methods of seedling raising and cultivation of potato buds.

Figure 1: Different methods of seedling raising and cultivation of potato buds.

(A) Potato tuber treatment method for seedling cultivation with potato tuber; (B) potato buds with different lengths were used for seedling cultivation; from left to right, the potato bud lengths were three cm, five cm and seven cm, respectively. (C) Different parts of potato buds were used for seedling cultivation; from left to right, they were potato terminal bud, potato middle bud and potato tail bud, respectively.

Materials & Methods

Source of material and cultivation

A total of four virus-free potato varieties (Fujin, Youjin, Zhongshu 4, and Feiwuruita) were used, which were collected from the Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China. These materials yield healthy seed potatoes with excellent phenotypes, such as plant height (50∼72 cm), average number of potatoes per plant (5∼7), average potato weight (115∼151 g) and commercial potato rate (71.3%∼88%). These experimental materials were grown in a greenhouse of a practical experiment farm of Jilin Agricultural University, China. Sandy loam soil was collected and mixed with farm manure. The soil-nutrient mixture was added to pots to a depth of 30 cm. The physical and chemical properties of the soil included 1.41 g kg−1 total nitrogen, 0.34 g kg−1 total phosphorus, 8.9 g kg−1 total potassium and 40.6 g kg−1 organic matter.

Experimental design and measurements

Seed potatoes were selected on the basis of significant morphological characteristics and a lack of visual abnormalities. Three independent trials were conducted in all cases.

  1. Raising of seedlings and cultivation of potato buds with different lengths: The potato buds were divided into three categories based on length: three cm ± 0.5 cm, five cm ± 0.5 cm, and seven cm ± 0.5 cm. Virus-free potato seeds of the same size and with strong dormancy were treated to promote germination under dark:light conditions. When the bud length reached three cm ± 0.5 cm (seed potato treatment for 8–9 d, T1), five cm ± 0.5 cm (seed potato treatment for 10–11 d, T2) and seven cm ± 0.5 cm (seed potato treatment for 12–13 d, T3) (Fig. 1B), terminal buds were selected, and bud breaking treatment was performed. The buds were detached at the basal ends and sown into 10 cm × 10 cm nutrient pots under 20∼22  °C temperature, 60% air humidity, and a 14 h/8 h light-dark cycle. Seedlings were raised in a greenhouse beginning on March 25th, and 25-day-old seedlings were then planted in the greenhouse on April 20th.

  2. Raising of seedlings and cultivation of buds from various parts of potatoes: potato buds were grouped into three treatments according to their origin on the potato tuber: terminal buds (T4), middle buds (middle part of the seed potato, T5) and tail bud (basal bud, T6). When the length of the potato bud reached five cm ± 0.5 cm (seed potato treatment for 10–11 d) (Fig. 1C), bud breaking treatment was conducted on the basal part of the potato bud, and the same described in (1) above were performed.

  3. Seed potato seedlings were cut and cultivated in nutrient pots (CK) (Fig. 1A). The seed potatoes were removed from the storage pit and placed in an incubator with light at 20 °C and 60% air humidity. When the bud length reached 1–2 cm, the bud was cultured under indoor scattered light for 2∼3 days. The seed potato was cut into bud blocks weighing 20 g and sown into a 10 cm × 10 cm nutrient pot, with one plant per bowl. The seedlings were raised in a greenhouse beginning on March 17th and transferred at 25 days of age on March 2nd. All seedlings were grown together.

A total of three experimental trials were performed in raised beds with a 1.2 m width, 5 m length, and 10 cm height, and a protective transparent film cover was applied. For double-row cultivation, the row spacing of border plants was 25 cm × 40 cm. The experiment was repeated three times following a randomized complete block design (RCBD). The environmental conditions were maintained at 17∼22 °C and 11∼13 h of light per day, and other environmental conditions, such as watering, air humidity, and fertilization, were flexibly adjusted according to growth stage.

Sampling and measurements

Measurement of the photosynthesis rate and chlorophyll contents

The photosynthesis rate of potato seedlings was determined at suitable times from 9:30 am to 11:30 am. Ten leaf samples (with each sample from the third mature leaflet from the of the plant) were carefully selected for photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) measurement. Then, the photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), and stomatal conductance (Gs) were determined by using a LI-6400XT photosynthetic apparatus (LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The illumination intensity was 1,600 µmol photons m2 s−1, the gas flow rate was 500 mmol s−1, the concentration of cuvette CO2 was set at 400 mmol CO2 mol−1 air, and the chamber temperature was 28 °C. Then, the mixture was centrifuged with 85% (v/v) acetone solution for chlorophyll extraction, and spectrophotometric (HALO DB-20, Calamb, UK) measurements were obtained at 663 and 645 nm (Paul & Driscoll, 1997). Potato leaves were sampled to determine the total chlorophyll contents in plants.

Measurement of agronomic parameters

Stem diameter was measured from 5 replicates of standing field plants by using an electronic Vernier caliper (instrument precision, 0.01 mm) as described previously (Chang et al., 2016). The length and height of potato stems were measured by using a ruler with a one mm scale. A total of five plants were selected from each treatment, readings were taken three times, and the average value was calculated to determine the number of compound leaves per plant. The area of compound leaves was measured at the seedling stage and tuber expansion stage. For this purpose, five plants were randomly selected from each treatment and measured three times by using a handheld laser leaf area meter (Ci-203, CID, Inc., Vancouver, WA, USA).

Potato plants were harvested for measurements of agronomic parameters. The aboveground biomass was measured after the plants were oven-dried at 70 °C. The dry matter of detached plant organs (leaves, stems, roots, stolons and tubers) was weighed. The ratio of organ dry matter was calculated as organ (leaf, stem, root, stolon, tuber) weight/aboveground biomass × 100%; the root:shoot ratio was calculated as root dry weight/shoot dry weight × 100%; and the seedling index was calculated as (stem diameter/plant height + root dry weight/shoot dry weight) × (root dry weight + shoot dry weight).

Root activity was analyzed by the triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) method (Wang et al., 2006). TTC is a chemical that is reduced by dehydrogenases and mainly succinate dehydrogenase when added to a tissue. Dehydrogenase activity is regarded as an index of root activity. In brief, 0.5 g of fresh root was immersed in 10 ml of an equally mixed solution of 0.4% TTC and phosphate buffer and kept in the dark at 37 °C for 2 h. Afterward, 2 ml of H2SO4 (1 mol/L) was added to stop the reaction. The roots were dried with filter paper and then extracted with ethyl acetate. The red extractant was transferred into a volumetric flask and mixed with enough ethyl acetate to reach a total volume of 10 ml. The absorbance of the extract at 485 nm was recorded. Finally, root activity was expressed as TTC reduction intensity. Root activity was calculated as the amount of TTC reduction (µg)/fresh root weight (g) × time (h).

Determination of potato yield and quality

After harvest, all tubers in each subplot were weighed for yield assessment using an electronic scale, and the number of tubers per plant was determined. Relative yield was calculated as the total yield of each treatment/yield of CK. The starch content of the plant sample was assayed as reported previously (Grechi et al., 2007). After removing the plant residue, tissue starch was extracted with 80% (v/v) ethanol. After adding 3% HCl to the residue, the spectra were determined by photometric determination at 490 nm by the phenol–sulfuric acid method. A glucose calibration curve was established to calculate tissue starch content, expressed in mg/g dry weight.

For the determination of reducing sugars, each sample was divided into three test tubes with pistons. The filtrates of centrifuged potato tuber were ground into liquid (0.2 ml), and distilled water (1.8 ml) was added to the test tubes. The method for determining the reducing sugar content was the DNS (Miller, 1959) method. The recorded data were used with a standard curve to calculate the reducing sugar content of ground potato tuber liquid. Crude protein was detected by Coomassie brilliant blue staining (Gao, Wang & Luo, 2014), and vitamin C was determined by molybdenum blue colorimetry (Li, 2000).

Data analysis

The recorded data were statistically analyzed by using SPSS 20.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc tests (Tukey’s test) was used to detect differences among treatments. The mean values showing significant differences were compared with the Tukey test at a 5% level (Anita, 1988).

Results

Effects of seedling raising on the physiological indices and growth indices of potato at the seedling stage

The chlorophyll content and net photosynthetic rate of developed seedlings with different tuber bud lengths showed the highest values for T3, followed by T2, and T1 showed the lowest values, but they were significantly different from those in the CK treatment, as shown in Table 1. The potato seedlings were obtained by cultivating bud seedlings from different parts of the potato in nutrient pots, and the physiological indicators of each seedling stage were analyzed (Table 2). According to the chlorophyll content and net photosynthetic rate, the treatments ranked as follows: T4 > T5 > T6 > CK. The T4 and T5 treatments were significantly different from T6 and CK, respectively, but no significant difference was observed between T6 and CK. The net photosynthetic rate was not significantly different between nursery treatments T5, T6 and CK. The transpiration rate and stomatal conductance decreased in turn in the four treatments of the same variety, and the tested potato varieties showed consistency.

Table 1:
The photosynthetic parameter indices of different lengths of potato bud seedlings at the seedling stage.
Treatments Chlorophyll content (mg/g) Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) µmol m−2 s−1 Photosynthetic rate (Pn) µmolCO2 m−2 s−1 Transpiration rate (Tr) m mol m−2 s−1 Stomatal conductance (Gs) m mol m−2 s−1
Fujin T1 1.87def 1012a 11.25g 1.9gh 129efg
T2 2.11cd 1012a 13.50d 2.3def 146cd
T3 2.52b 1012a 14.07c 2.7bc 162b
CK 1.55gh 1012a 10.30ij 1.5ij 111hi
Youjin T1 1.58fgh 1012a 11.06gh 1.8hi 121gh
T2 1.94de 1012a 12.60f 2.2efg 138de
T3 2.30bc 1012a 13.29de 2.6bcd 152bc
CK 1.29h 1012a 10.10j 1.4j 110hi
Zhongshu 4 T1 2.30bc 1012a 12.78ef 2.3def 132efg
T2 2.61b 1012a 14.40c 2.6bcd 156bc
T3 3.12a 1012a 15.21b 3.1a 172a
CK 1.65efg 1012a 10.70hi 1.7hij 123fg
Feiwurita T1 1.86def 1012a 13.08def 2.0fgh 121gh
T2 2.01cd 1012a 15.10b 2.4cde 134ef
T3 2.47b 1012a 16.03a 2.9ab 149c
CK 1.49gh 1012a 11.30g 1.5ij 109i
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-1

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Table 2:
The photosynthetic parameter indices of various positions of potato bud seedlings at the seedling stage.
Treatments Chlorophyll content (mg/g) Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) µmol m−2 s−1 Photosynthetic rate (Pn) µmolCO2 m−2 s−1 Transpiration rate (Tr) m mol m−2 s−1 Stomatal conductance (Gs) m mol m−2 s−1
Fujin T4 2.11b 1012a 13.5c 2.3ab 146ab
T5 1.94bc 1012a 11.5ef 2.1bc 130cdef
T6 1.61def 1012a 10.6ghi 1.6de 117fgh
CK 1.55def 1012a 10.3ij 1.5de 111h
Youjin T4 1.94bc 1012a 12.6d 2.2b 138bcd
T5 1.54def 1012a 11.1fgh 2.1bc 127cdefg
T6 1.31gh 1012a 10.2ij 1.5de 115fgh
CK 1.29h 1012a 10.1j 1.4e 109h
Zhongshu 4 T4 2.61a 1012a 14.4b 2.6a 156a
T5 2.14b 1012a 12.4de 2.2b 141bc
T6 1.72de 1012a 10.9ghi 1.8cd 127cdefg
CK 1.65def 1012a 10.7ghi 1.7de 123defgh
Feiwurita T4 2.01b 1012a 15.1a 2.4ab 134bcde
T5 1.74cd 1012a 13.4c 2.1bc 120efgh
T6 1.51efg 1012a 12.2de 1.6de 112gh
CK 1.49fgh 1012a 11.3efg 1.5de 109h
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-2

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Effects of seedling raising on the growth indices and quality of potato plants at the seedling stage

There were significant differences in the plant height, stem diameter, and compound leaf number of potato at the seedling stage among the treatments with different lengths of potato buds (Table 3). Seedling cultivation with seven cm potato buds was significantly longer than that with five cm and three cm buds; however, overall, the values in the three treatments were much higher than those in the CK treatment.

Table 3:
Growth indices of potato seedlings developed from different lengths of potato buds.
Treatment Plant height (cm) Stem diameter (mm) Number of compound leaves (piece)
Fujin T1 9.47 ± 0.86fg 7.49 ± 0.02g 6.12 ± 0.15g
T2 10.74 ± 0.62de 9.57 ± 0.01e 6.97 ± 0.10e
T3 12.15 ± 0.38bc 10.67 ± 0.01c 8.02 ± 0.10b
CK 8.12 ± 0.76h 6.63 ± 0.02h 5.05 ± 0.05j
Youjin T1 11.25 ± 0.09cde 8.17 ± 0.01f 6. 92 ± 0.18e
T2 12.14 ± 0.15bc 9.43 ± 0.01e 7.50 ± 0.14d
T3 13.24 ± 0.16a 10.18 ± 0.01d 8.76 ± 0.12a
CK 10.87 ± 0.26de 6.45 ± 0.01h 6.10 ± 0.14gh
Zhongshu 4 T1 9.07 ± 0.74g 10.02 ± 0.01d 6.04 ± 0.12gh
T2 11.27 ± 0.5cde 9.98 ± 0.14d 6.50 ± 0.19f
T3 12.78 ± 0.20ab 11.12 ± 0.04b 7.61 ± 0.16cd
CK 8.57 ± 0.11gh 7.36 ± 0.01g 5.40 ± 0.14i
Feiwurita T1 10.28 ± 0.15def 8.17 ± 0.01f 6.23 ± 0.13fg
T2 11.39 ± 0.24cd 10.16 ± 0.01d 6.80 ± 0.13e
T3 13.01 ± 0.25ab 11.46 ± 0.01a 7.87 ± 0.16bc
CK 9.47 ± 0.31fg 7.92 ± 0.03f 5.80 ± 0.12h
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-3

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

The T3 treatment increased plant height, stem diameter and leaf number in the ‘Fujin’ variety by 49.63%, 60.94% and 58.81%, respectively, compared with those in CK. It increased these parameters in ‘Youjin’ by 21.80%, 57.83% and 43.61%, respectively, compared to those in CK; those in ‘Zhongshu 4’ by 49.12%, 51.09% and 40.93%, respectively; and those in ‘Feiwuruita’ by 37.38%, 44.7% and 35.69%, respectively. In terms of the quality of potato seedlings at the seedling stage (i.e., aboveground dry weight, belowground dry weight, root activity, and seedling index), the different potato bud length treatments were ordered T3 > T2 > T1 > CK. Most of the measured indicators in T3 were significantly different from those in CK (Table 4).

Table 4:
Seedling quality of potato seedlings of different lengths measured at the seedling stage.
Treatments Shoot dry weight (g) Root dry weight (g) Root shoot ratio Root activity µg/(g h) Strong seedling index
Fujin T1 0.89 ± 0.09gh 0.21 ± 0.02efgh 0.23 ± 0.02bc 130.24 ± 2.56e 0.34 ± 0.03gh
T2 0.97 ± 0.10ef 0.25 ± 0.03defg 0.26 ± 0.02bc 152.21 ± 2.21c 0.42 ± 0.03ef
T3 1.13 ± 0.06cd 0.37 ± 0.02ab 0.33 ± 0.03a 161.07 ± 2.78b 0.63 ± 0.01b
CK 0.84 ± 0.08ghi 0.17 ± 0.02h 0.20 ± 0.01c 119.82 ± 2.00f 0.29 ± 0.01hi
Youjin T1 0.80 ± 0.05hi 0.21 ± 0.05efgh 0.26 ± 0.02bc 127.42 ± 2.27e 0.34 ± 0.02gh
T2 0.89 ± 0.07fgh 0.23 ± 0.03efgh 0.27 ± 0.02bc 139.59 ± 1.75d 0.37 ± 0.02fg
T3 1.16 ± 0.07c 0.33 ± 0.05bc 0.29 ± 0.01ab 142.15 ± 2.03d 0.54 ± 0.02c
CK 0.75 ± 0.03i 0.18 ± 0.02h 0.24 ± 0.03bc 110.89 ± 2.66g 0.27 ± 0.02i
Zhongshu 4 T1 0.87 ± 0.02fghi 0.20 ± 0.01fgh 0.23 ± 0.02bc 148.17 ± 1.79c 0.37 ± 0.02fg
T2 1.01 ± 0.01de 0.28 ± 0.01cde 0.28 ± 0.02ab 163.45 ± 2.94b 0.47 ± 0.03de
T3 1.32 ± 0.02b 0.38 ± 0.02ab 0.29 ± 0.02ab 170.18 ± 2.13a 0.64 ± 0.04b
CK 0.76 ± 0.10hi 0.18 ± 0.02gh 0.24 ± 0.02bc 129.86 ± 1.90e 0.31 ± 0.02hi
Feiwurita T1 0.96 ± 0.02efg 0.26 ± 0.04def 0.27 ± 0.02bc 130.66 ± 2.61e 0.42 ± 0.02ef
T2 1.12 ± 0.01cd 0.30 ± 0.02de 0.27 ± 0.02bc 148.75 ± 4.89c 0.51 ± 0.01cd
T3 1.56 ± 0.02a 0.42 ± 0.03a 0.27 ± 0.01bc 153.29 ± 1.87c 0.71 ± 0.01a
CK 0.77 ± 0.01hi 0.20 ± 0.01fgh 0.26 ± 0.03bc 115.08 ± 2.13fg 0.33 ± 0.01ghi
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-4

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Furthermore, buds from different parts of the tuber were used for seedling cultivation in nutrient pots, and the results at the seedling stage are shown in Table 5. Within varieties, treatments ranked in terms of plant height, stem diameter and compound leaf number as T4 > T5 > T6 > CK, with terminal buds yielding significantly higher values than observed in the CK treatment. All the tested varieties showed the same performance, with the indices of plant height, stem diameter and leaf number of ‘Fujin’ increasing by 32.10%, 43.94% and 35.29%, respectively, those of “Youjin” increasing by 11.01%, 48.44% and 22.95%, respectively, those of ‘Zhongshu 4’ increasing by 31.40%, 35.62% and 20.37%, respectively, and those of ‘Feiwurita’ increasing by 20.00%, 27.85%, and 17.24%, respectively, compared with those in the CK treatment.

Table 5:
Growth indices of potato seedlings developed with various positions of potato bud.
Treatments Plant height (cm) Stem diameter (mm) Number of compound leaves (piece)
Fujin T4 10.74 ± 0.19def 9.57 ± 0.02ab 6.87 ± 0.09ab
T5 9.87 ± 0.15hij 8.03 ± 0.06ef 6.20 ± 0.21def
T6 9.01 ± 0.12jk 6.94 ± 0.01hi 5.95 ± 0.12ef
CK 8.12 ± 0.07m 6.63 ± 0.02i 5.05 ± 0.10g
Youjin T4 12.14 ± 0.15a 9.53 ± 0.03ab 7.50 ± 0.42a
T5 11.54 ± 0.36b 8.27 ± 0.04def 6.95 ± 0.14a
T6 10.98 ± 0.44bcde 7.01 ± 0.06ghi 6.72 ± 0.02abc
CK 10.87 ± 0.26cdef 6.45 ± 0.03i 6.10 ± 0.14ef
Zhongshu 4 T4 11.27 ± 0.50bcd 9.97 ± 0.01a 6.50 ± 0.21bcd
T5 10.29 ± 0.19fgh 8.99 ± 0.02bcd 6.00 ± 0.14ef
T6 9.98 ± 0.19hij 7.74 ± 0.02efgh 5.85 ± 0.07f
CK 8.57 ± 0.11km 7.35 ± 0.02fghi 5.40 ± 0.22g
Feiwurita T4 11.39 ± 0.24bc 10.14 ± 0.06a 6.80 ± 0.12ab
T5 10.57 ± 0.26efg 9.27 ± 0.04abc 6.35 ± 0.17cde
T6 10.02 ± 0.12ghij 8.39 ± 0.03cde 5.90 ± 0.16f
CK 9.47 ± 0.31ij 7.92 ± 0.05efg 5.80 ± 0.12f
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-5

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

The effects of bud source on potato seedling quality are shown in Table 6. The aboveground dry weight in the seedling raising treatments was higher than that in the CK treatment, and the four varieties showed consistent results. The dry weight of aboveground parts and the dry weight of belowground parts of seedlings derived from terminal buds were significantly different from those in the CK treatment. In terms of root activity and the seedling index of all tested varieties, the treatments were ordered T4 > T5 > T6 > CK, with all varieties showing the same performance trend.

Table 6:
Seedling quality of potato measured at the seedling stage with various positions of potato bud.
Treatments Shoot dry weight (g) Root dry weight (g) Root shoot ratio Root activity µg/ (g h) Sound seedling index
Fujin T4 0.97 ± 0.01b 0.25 ± 0.02bc 0.26 ± 0.02abc 152.15 ± 5.62b 0.42 ± 0.01c
T5 0.94 ± 0.01bce 0.20 ± 0.01def 0.21 ± 0.01de 139.98 ± 6.69cde 0.34 ± 0.01ef
T6 0.89 ± 0.01cd 0.19 ± 0.02ef 0.21 ± 0.01e 121.54 ± 5.92fgh 0.31 ± 0.01ghi
CK 0.84 ± 0.01defg 0.17 ± 0.01f 0.20 ± 0.01e 119.82 ± 2.13fgh 0.29 ± 0.01ij
Youjin T4 0.89 ± 0.01cd 0.23 ± 0.01cd 0.26 ± 0.01a 139.59 ± 8.86cde 0.37 ± 0.01d
T5 0.86 ± 0.02de 0.20 ± 0.01def 0.23 ± 0.01cde 124.31 ± 2.83fg 0.32 ± 0.01fgh
T6 0.79 ± 0.02efgh 0.19 ± 0.01ef 0.23 ± 0.01cde 115.20 ± 4.00gh 0.28 ± 0.01ij
CK 0.75 ± 0.02h 0.18 ± 0.01ef 0.23 ± 0.01bcde 110.89 ± 3.13h 0.27 ± 0.01j
Zhongshu 4 T4 1.01 ± 0.06b 0.28 ± 0.01ab 0.28 ± 0.02a 163.45 ± 7.00a 0.47 ± 0.01b
T5 0.96 ± 0.01bc 0.21 ± 0.01de 0.22 ± 0.01de 143.26 ± 5.38bcd 0.36 ± 0.02de
T6 0.82 ± 0.01defgh 0.17 ± 0.01ef 0.21 ± 0.01de 135.47 ± 6.34de 0.31 ± 0.01ghi
CK 0.76 ± 0.01gh 0.18 ± 0.01ef 0.24 ± 0.01bcde 129.86 ± 2.23ef 0.31 ± 0.01ghi
Feiwurita T4 1.12 ± 0.09a 0.30 ± 0.02a 0.27 ± 0.01abc 148.75 ± 3.94bc 0.51 ± 0.01a
T5 0.97 ± 0.02b 0.25 ± 0.01bc 0.25 ± 0.01abc 137.23 ± 5.38cde 0.42 ± 0.01c
T6 0.84 ± 0.01def 0.21 ± 0.01de 0.25 ± 0.01abcd 120.09 ± 5.06fgh 0.35 ± 0.01de
CK 0.77 ± 0.03fgh 0.20 ± 0.01def 0.26 ± 0.02abc 115.08 ± 2.38gh 0.33 ± 0.01efg
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-6

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Effect of seedling cultivation on potato plants in the greenhouse

By comparing the plant growth of potatoes grown from potato buds of different lengths during the tuber expansion stage, it was found that the three growth indicators plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area in each treatment and within the varieties were different, showing the order T3 > T2 > T1 > CK. The treatments were significantly different, and the performance trends of the four experimental varieties were consistent.

Plant height increased by a maximum of 23.90% in the T3 treatment for the ‘Feiwurita’ variety, and the stem diameter and leaf area increased the most in the T3 treatment for ’Feiwurita’, with increases of 37.32% and 16.84%, respectively (Table 7). The comparison of plant growth between potato buds collected from distinct positions during the expansion period of potato tubers is shown in Table 8. In the potato tuber expansion period, the three growth indicators plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area showed the following treatment order in each variety: T4 ≥T5 > T6 ≥CK. The greatest plant height of 69.52 cm was observed for seedling cultivation from terminal buds of the variety ‘Youjin,’ the maximum stem diameter was 15.99 mm for ‘Zhongshu 4’, and the leaf area of ‘Zhongshu 4’ was the greatest at 6810 cm2. The largest increases in stem diameter compared with that in the CK treatment were observed for the cultivation of ‘Fujin’ seedlings from terminal buds, which were 24.31%, 31.28%, and 13.55% (Table 8).

Table 7:
Growth indices of potato seedlings with different lengths of potato buds in the potato tuber expansion stage.
Treatments Plant height (cm) Stem diameter (cm) Leaf area (cm2)
Fujin T1 54.09 ± 0.65h 13.41 ± 0.19g 6209 ± 26.88g
T2 59.88 ± 0.97f 15.74 ± 0.16d 6572 ± 26.47d
T3 64.12 ± 0.71d 16.30 ± 0.11ab 6728 ± 19.20c
CK 48.17 ± 0.82i 12.24 ± 0.19i 5788 ± 22.10j
Youjin T1 62.04 ± 1.31e 12.78 ± 0.16h 6394 ± 11.51f
T2 69.52 ± 0.77b 14.96 ± 0.12f 6799 ± 12.56b
T3 73.08 ± 0.78a 15.30 ± 0.11e 6937 ± 14.98a
CK 63.27 ± 0.58de 11.74 ± 0.21j 5989 ± 13.14h
Zhongshu 4 T1 54.13 ± 0.41h 13.24 ± 0.18g 6486 ± 9.20e
T2 59.22 ± 0.87fg 15.99 ± 0.09cd 6810 ± 15.76b
T3 65.80 ± 0.75c 16.67 ± 0.09a 6921 ± 33.53a
CK 47.81 ± 1.34i 12.39 ± 0.13i 6017 ± 9.89h
Feiwurita T1 63.05 ± 0.69de 12.78 ± 0.18h 6456 ± 19.02e
T2 67.29 ± 0.53c 15.09 ± 0.14ef 6710 ± 19.51c
T3 71.84 ± 0.49a 16.08 ± 0.12bc 6926 ± 20.60a
CK 57.98 ± 0.58g 11.71 ± 0.20j 5928 ± 24.71i
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-7

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Table 8:
Growth indices of potato seedlings with various positions of potato bud in potato tuber expansion stage.
Treatments Plant height (cm) Stem diameter (cm) Leaf area (cm2)
Fujin T4 59.88 ± 1.27d 15.74 ± 0.33a 6572 ± 51.23cd
T5 57.54 ± 0.84d 14.98 ± 0.29ab 6420 ± 34.76de
T6 49.36 ± 0.91f 12.01 ± 0.26d 6077 ± 75.23fgh
CK 48.17 ± 0.81f 11.99 ± 0.09d 5788 ± 41.81i
Youjin T4 69.52 ± 0.98a 14.96 ± 0.17ab 6799 ± 92.28ab
T5 68.46 ± 1.10a 14.27 ± 0.24abc 6601 ± 85.61bcd
T6 64.18 ± 1.30c 11.98 ± 0.26d 6249 ± 11.99ef
CK 63.27 ± 0.93c 11.74 ± 0.17d 5989 ± 89.54h
Zhongshu 4 T4 59.22 ± 1.47d 15.99 ± 0.07a 6810 ± 78.38a
T5 57.14 ± 1.73d 15.02 ± 0.21ab 6507 ± 75.91cd
T6 48.90 ± 1.20f 12.94 ± 0.18bcd 6200 ± 33.35fg
CK 47.81 ± 1.79f 12.39 ± 0.14cd 6017 ± 71.38gh
Feiwurita T4 67.29 ± 1.19ab 15.09 ± 0.14ab 6710 ± 76.8abc
T5 65.07 ± 1.03bc 14.62 ± 0.20ab 6459 ± 55.86d
T6 59.82 ± 1.18d 11.98 ± 0.08d 6104 ± 86.37fgh
CK 57.98 ± 1.26d 11.71 ± 0.13d 5928 ± 53.55hi
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-8

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

During the expansion stage of potato tubers, the dry matter distribution rate in different tissues and organs was the highest, and the order of organs from large to small was tubers, stems, leaves, roots and stolons. The distribution rate of dry matter showed the following order among the treatments with potato buds of different lengths: T3 > T2 > T1 > CK. Within varieties, the distribution rates of tissues and organs (tubers, stems and leaves) in T1 and T2 were generally the same, with minor differences, but significantly higher than those in the T3 and CK treatments. In the T1 treatment, the percentage of tubers among varieties was approximately 33%, and the percentage of stems and leaves was approximately 64% (Fig. 2A). The percentage of ‘Zhongshu No. 4’ tubers was the highest (34.12%), and the proportion of stems and leaves was 63.01%. The stem and leaf accounted for the largest percentage in CK, with the highest percentage observed for ‘Youjin’: 80.87%.

Distribution rate of dry matter of different tissues and organs at the potato tuber expansion stage.

Figure 2: Distribution rate of dry matter of different tissues and organs at the potato tuber expansion stage.

(A) Comparative effects of T1, T2, T3, and CK; (B) Comparative effects of T4, T5, T6, and CK.

In terms of the dry matter distribution rate in the tuber expansion stage, the treatments including plants from potato buds of different positions were ordered as followed: T4 > T5 > T6 > CK. The four tested varieties showed the same performance. The highest material distribution rate was 34.12%, and the lowest rate was 16.30%, which was observed for direct seeding of ‘Youjin’ buds. The stem dry matter distribution rate and leaf dry matter distribution rate of each variety were the highest in CK (Fig. 2B).

In the potato tuber expansion stage, the physiological indices (chlorophyll content and photosynthetic indices) of potato sprouts from buds of different lengths in the nutrient pots were the highest in the T3 treatment, followed by the T2 > T1 treatments and then CK. The maximum photosynthetic rate was 20.9 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 in ‘Feiwurita’ under the T1 treatment, and the highest chlorophyll content was found in ‘Zhongshu 4’ under the T3 treatment, which was 4.26 mg g−1. The seedling chlorophyll content of the four tested potato varieties, “Fujin, Youjin, Zhongshu 4 and Feiwuruita”, increased dramatically, measuring 32.97%, 49.57%, 51.06% and 37.93%, respectively, and the photosynthetic rate increased by 23.33%, 23.81%, 22.22% and 15.47%, respectively (Table 9).

Table 9:
The photosynthetic parameter index of different lengths of potato bud seedlings in the potato tuber expansion stage.
Treatments Chlorophyll content (mg/g) Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) µmol m−2 s−1 Photosynthetic rate (Pn) µmolCO2 m−2 s−1 Transpiration rate (Tr) m mol m−2 s−1 Stomatal conductance (Gs) m mol m−2 s−1
Fujin T1 2.96 ± 0.10fg 1125a 16.4 ± 0.35h 3.5 ± 0.19cd 240 ± 7.2de
T2 3.32 ± 0.07de 1125a 17.3 ± 0.28g 3.9 ± 0.17bc 251 ± 8.0cd
T3 3.71 ± 0.13bc 1125a 18.5 ± 0.21ef 4.2 ± 0.19ab 259 ± 8.5bc
CK 2.79 ± 0.13gh 1125a 15.0 ± 0.24jk 3.0 ± 0.13ef 221 ± 6.3f
Youjin T1 2.76 ± 0.10ef 1125a 15.6 ± 0.29ij 3.3 ± 0.19de 218 ± 2.8fg
T2 3.12 ± 0.10cd 1125a 16.9 ± 0.45gh 3.7 ± 0.13cd 239 ± 6.6de
T3 3.50 ± 0.09i 1125a 18.2 ± 0.43ef 3.9 ± 0.13bc 247 ± 10.6cd
CK 2.34 ± 0.14de 1125a 14.7 ± 0.45k 2.8 ± 0.13f 199 ± 9.0h
Zhongshu 4 T1 3.27 ± 0.12b 1125a 17.4 ± 0.42g 3.9 ± 0.14bc 270 ± 10.6b
T2 3.89 ± 0.12a 1125a 18.9 ± 0.29de 4.3 ± 0.18ab 286 ± 7.1a
T3 4.26 ± 0.08gh 1125a 19.8 ± 0.37bc 4.5 ± 0.12a 290 ± 3.7a
CK 2.82 ± 0.06gh 1125a 16.2 ± 0.28hi 3.6 ± 0.17cd 249 ± 4.5cd
Feiwurita T1 2.85 ± 0.09gh 1125a 19.3 ± 0.45cd 3.9 ± 0.12bc 227 ± 5.3ef
T2 3.24 ± 0.11e 1125a 20.1 ± 0.28b 4.2 ± 0.13ab 240 ± 5.8de
T3 3.60 ± 0.12c 1125a 20.9 ± 0.24a 4.4 ± 0.18a 245 ± 5.6cd
CK 2.61 ± 0.11h 1125a 18.1 ± 0.21f 3.5 ± 0.14cd 204 ± 4.5gh
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-9

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

During the expansion period, potato tubers showed significant differences in the chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate depending on bud position (Table 10). Specifically, among treatments the photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate of potato during the expansion stage showed the order T4 > T5 > T6 > CK, and T4 and T5 were significantly different from T6 and CK, respectively. The performance trends of all varieties were similar. ’Zhong Shu No. 4’ had the highest chlorophyll content of 3.89 mg g−1, and the highest photosynthetic rate was observed in ‘Feiwurita’ at 20.1 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1. The stomatal conductance of plants derived from buds at different positions was not obviously different during the expansion period. The chlorophyll content of ‘Zhongshu 4’ seedlings derived from terminal buds was the highest. Compared with that in CK, the photosynthetic rate of plants from these buds increased most obviously, by 37.94% and 16.67%.

Table 10:
The photosynthetic parameter index of various positions of potato bud seedlings at the potato tuber expansion stage.
Treatments Chlorophyll content (mg/g) Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) µmol m−2 s−1 Photosynthetic rate (Pn) µmolCO2 m−2 s−1 Transpiration rate (Tr) m mol m−2 s−1 Stomatal conductance (Gs) m mol m−2 s−1
Fujin T4 3.32 ± 0.14b 1125a 17.3 ± 0.64bcde 3.9 ± 0.15bc 251 ± 12.5b
T5 3.18 ± 0.12bc 1125a 16.4 ± 0.45efg 3.6 ± 0.09cd 247 ± 7.7bc
T6 2.84 ± 0.11def 1125a 15.4 ± 0.50fgh 3.2 ± 0.12e 229 ± 10.1cd
CK 2.79 ± 0.09ef 1125a 15.0 ± 0.57gh 3.0 ± 0.13ef 221 ± 8.8de
Youjin T4 3.12 ± 0.19bcd 1125a 16.9 ± 0.78def 3.7 ± 0.14cd 239 ± 8.5bc
T5 2.94 ± 0.17cde 1125a 16.2 ± 0.61efgh 3.6 ± 0.14cd 235 ± 10.9bcd
T6 2.42 ± 0.10g 1125a 14.9 ± 0.56gh 2.9 ± 0.21ef 202 ± 6.1f
CK 2.34 ± 0.18g 1125a 14.7 ± 0.63h 2.8 ± 0.09f 199 ± 8.5f
Zhongshu 4 T4 3.89 ± 0.16a 1125a 18.9 ± 0.89abc 4.3 ± 0.13a 286 ± 6.3a
T5 3.68 ± 0.12a 1125a 17.8 ± 1.06bcde 4.1 ± 0.20ab 278 ± 2.9a
T6 2.93 ± 0.09cdef 1125a 16.4 ± 0.65efg 3.7 ± 0.10cd 252 ± 8.6b
CK 2.82 ± 0.14def 1125a 16.2 ± 0.57efgh 3.6 ± 0.14cd 249 ± 7.1b
Feiwurita T4 3.24 ± 0.14bc 1125a 20.1 ± 0.89a 4.2 ± 0.08ab 240 ± 5.6bc
T5 3.08 ± 0.11bcde 1125a 19.4 ± 0.82ab 4.1 ± 0.17ab 235 ± 4.3bcd
T6 2.81 ± 0.11def 1125a 18.3 ± 0.73bcd 3.6 ± 0.20cd 210 ± 6.1ef
CK 2.61 ± 0.14fg 1125a 18.1 ± 0.63bcd 3.5 ± 0.09d 204 ± 4.5f
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-10

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Effects of seedling cultivation methods on the earliness and yield of potato

The planting dates of the treatments were the same, and the harvest time and growth days in the shed were different. Within varieties, the earliest maturity was observed in T3, followed by T2, T1 and CK. Compared with the CK, the T3 treatment advanced harvest by 13 days, and the difference in harvest time between the T3 and T2 treatments was small, only 1–2 days (Table 11).

Table 11:
Comparison of phenological periods of potato seedlings with different bud lengths.
Treatments Colonization time (month / day) Harvest time (month / day) Growth days in shed (day) Relative growth days
Fujin T1 4/20 6/18 58 −7
T2 4/20 6/13 53 −12
T3 4/20 6/12 52 −13
T4 4/20 6/13 53 −12
T5 4/20 6/17 57 −8
T6 4/20 6/23 63 −2
CK 4/20 6/25 65 0
Youjin T1 4/20 6/20 60 −6
T2 4/20 6/16 56 −11
T3 4/20 6/14 54 −13
T4 4/20 6/16 56 −11
T5 4/20 6/20 60 −7
T6 4/20 6/25 65 −2
CK 4/20 6/27 67 0
Zhongshu 4 T1 4/20 6/16 56 −8
T2 4/20 6/12 52 −12
T3 4/20 6/11 51 −13
T4 4/20 6/12 52 −12
T5 4/20 6/15 55 −9
T6 4/20 6/21 61 −3
CK 4/20 6/24 64 0
Feiwurita T1 4/20 6/18 58 −7
T2 4/20 6/13 53 −12
T3 4/20 6/12 52 −13
T4 4/20 6/18 58 −12
T5 4/20 6/22 62 −8
T6 4/20 6/26 66 −4
CK 4/20 6/30 70 0
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-11

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

The yield composition of all tested potato varieties derived from potato buds of different lengths was as follows: in terms of average weight per potato and average plot yield, the difference between T2 and T3 was small, but it was significantly larger than that between T1 and CK. In terms of average yield, the treatments ranked T3 > T2 > T1 > CK, the difference between T2 and T3 was not significant, but there was a significant difference from T1 and CK. Each treatment increased the yield by more than 10%, and the T3 treatment of ‘Zhongshu 4’ had the highest yield, reaching 3506.41 kg/667 m2, an increase of 46.35% (Table 12).

Table 12:
Effects of different lengths of potato bud seedlings on potato yield.
Treatments Number of tubers per plant (PCs.) Average weight per potato (g) Average plot yield (kg) Yield per mu (kg / 667 m2) Relative yield %
Fujin T1 4.0ab 136.88g 21.90i 2434.72g 110.27
T2 4.0a 149.43f 26.30f 2923.71d 132.41
T3 5.0a 150.11f 27.02e 3004.13d 136.05
CK 4.0ab 124.41hi 19.86k 2208.06h 100.00
Youjin T1 4.0ab 158.37e 25.34g 2816.46e 116.91
T2 4.0ab 194.10b 30.28c 3366.53b 139.74
T3 4.0ab 192.13bc 30.74bc 3417.24ab 141.84
CK 5.0a 120.39i 21.67i 2409.17g 100.00
Zhongshu 4 T1 4.0ab 152.81f 24.45h 2718.16ef 113.45
T2 4.0b 203.49a 30.93b 3439.29ab 143.55
T3 4.0ab 187.73c 31.54a 3506.41a 146.35
CK 4.0ab 134.69g 21.55i 2395.83g 100.00
Feiwurita T1 4.0ab 151.06f 24.17h 2687.14f 120.10
T2 4.0b 187.37c 28.48d 3166.53c 141.53
T3 4.0ab 180.56d 28.89d 3211.24c 143.53
CK 4.0ab 125.81h 20.13j 2237.38h 100.00
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-12

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

The yield of cultivated potato sprouts derived from buds at various positions was measured for each variety, and it was found that compared with those in CK, the average weight per potato and average plot yield were different (Table 13). In all varieties, the indices was maximal under the T4 treatment, followed by T5 and T6, and they were minimal in CK. The yields of ’Zhongshu 4’ and ’Youjin’ under the T4 treatment reached 3,439.29 kg/667 m2 and 3,366.53 kg/667 m2, representing increases of 43.55% and 41.53%, respectively. Yield did not significantly increase in the T6 treatment for any variety. For example, production increased by only 1.29% in ‘Zhongshu 4’.

Table 13:
Effects of different positions of potato bud seedlings on potato yield.
Treatments Number of tubers per plant (PCs.) Average weight per potato (g) Average plot yield (kg) Yield per mu (kg / 667m2) Relative yield %
Fujin T4 4.0a 149.43e 26.30e 2923.71d 132.41
T5 5.0a 137.89f 24.82f 2759.24e 124.96
T6 4.0ab 127.00ghi 20.32hi 2259.33h 102.32
CK 4.0ab 124.14i 19.86i 2208.06h 100.00
Youjin T4 4.0ab 194.10b 30.28ab 3366.53ab 139.74
T5 4.0ab 179.75c 28.76c 3196.81c 132.69
T6 5.0a 131.28fgh 23.63f 2627.18f 109.05
CK 5.0a 120.39i 21.67g 2409.17g 100.00
Zhongshu 4 T4 4.0b 203.49a 30.93a 3439.29a 143.55
T5 4.0ab 183.13c 29.30bc 3256.83bc 135.94
T6 4.0ab 136.63f 21.86g 2426.70g 101.29
CK 4.0ab 134.69fg 21.55g 2395.83g 100.00
Feiwurita T4 4.0b 187.37bc 28.48cd 3166.53c 141.53
T5 4.0ab 170.19d 27.23de 3026.97d 135.29
T6 4.0ab 133.06fgh 21.29gh 2367.24g 105.80
CK 4.0ab 125.81ghi 20.13hi 2237.38h 100.00
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-13

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Effects of seedling cultivation methods on potato quality

The postharvest potato quality measurements of plants from potato buds of different lengths and positions grown in nutrient pots are shown in Tables 14 and 15. The reducing sugar, starch, crude protein, and L-Vc contents did not differ between treatments in the same potato variety. However, there were significant differences in the reducing sugar and crude protein contents among the tested varieties. There was no difference in starch between ‘Youjin’ and ‘Zhongshu 4’, but there were significant differences between ‘Fujin’ and ‘Feiwurita’. There was no difference in the content of L-Vc between ’Fujin’ and ‘Youjin’, but it differed significantly different from that in ‘Zhongshu 4’ and ‘Feiwurita’, respectively. In terms of the commercial potato rate, the treatments were ordered T3 > T2 > T1 > CK and T4 > T5 > T6 > CK, and all tested varieties exhibited the same trend. In the experiment of seedlings from buds of different lengths and positions, the commercial potato variety that increased the most was the ‘Zhongshu 4’. That in seedlings from seven cm buds increased by 5.4% compared with that in the CK, and that in the seedlings from terminal buds increased by 4.9% compared with that in the CK.

Table 14:
Effects of different lengths of potato bud seedlings on potato quality.
Treatment Starch (%) Reducing sugar (%) Crude protein (%) VC content (mg / 100 g) Commercial potato rate %
Fujin T1 14.12a 0.086d 1.596a 0.294c 86.9
T2 14.38a 0.090d 1.608a 0.319c 88.8
T3 14.40a 0.092d 1.604a 0.312c 89.2
CK 14.10a 0.084d 1.587a 0.280c 84.7
Youjin T1 13.55b 0.063c 1.395c 0.288c 91.7
T2 13.75b 0.066c 1.413c 0.297c 92.9
T3 13.62b 0.067c 1.403c 0.290c 93.1
CK 13.46b 0.063c 1.387c 0.281c 90.8
Zhongshu 4 T1 12.44c 0.426b 1.518b 26.601b 85.1
T2 12.67c 0.436b 1.527b 28.313b 88.8
T3 12.58c 0.437b 1.524b 27.964b 89.3
CK 12.37cd 0.413b 1.507b 27.303b 83.9
Feiwurita T1 12.26d 1.020a 1.009d 123.174a 87.0
T2 12.34 cd 1.031a 1.019d 123.602a 89.2
T3 12.37cd 1.035a 1.018d 123.704a 89.4
CK 12.35cd 1.014a 1.001d 122.871a 86.1
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-14

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Table 15:
Effects of different positions of potato bud seedlings on potato quality.
Treatments Starch (%) Reducing sugar (%) Crude protein (%) VC content (mg / 100 g) Commercial potato rate %
Fujin T4 14.38a 0.090c 1.608a 0.319c 88.8
T5 14.24a 0.087c 1.602a 0.290c 87.9
T6 14.12a 0.085c 1.601a 0.283c 86.8
CK 14.10a 0.084c 1.587a 0.280c 84.7
Youjin T4 13.75b 0.066d 1.413c 0.297c 92.9
T5 13.60b 0.065d 1.409c 0.290c 92.4
T6 13.57b 0.063d 1.392c 0.284c 91.7
CK 13.46b 0.063d 1.387c 0.281c 90.8
Zhongshu 4 T4 12.67c 0.436b 1.527b 28.391b 88.8
T5 12.56c 0.427b 1.520b 27.942b 87.2
T6 12.38cd 0.415b 1.518b 27.622b 85.9
CK 12.37cd 0.413b 1.507b 27.303b 83.9
Feiwurita T4 12.34d 1.031a 1.019d 126.603a 89.2
T5 12.27d 1.027a 1.010d 124.564a 88.8
T6 12.29cd 1.015a 1.004d 122.985a 87.9
CK 12.25cd 1.014a 1.001d 122.871a 86.1
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/table-15

Notes:

Means followed by a different letter within the column are significantly different at (P < 0.05) probability level according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Discussion

In the current study, the bud planting method was used for the cultivation of potato seedlings. The results showed that seedling cultivation improved the physiological indices of potato plant growth, overall yield, and early maturity. Bud-seedling cultivation can significantly improve the yield of potato (Tables 12 and 13), and the result is consistent with early maturity and high yield in vegetable production (Hai et al., 2015). Potato bud-seedling cultivation makes full use of the main and auxiliary buds at each bud eye of the potato. This method greatly increases the reproduction coefficient of potato, which is consistent with previous findings concerning increasing the utilization rate of seed potato by repeatedly breaking off seedlings and transplanting them (He, 1997; Li, Zhao & Hu, 1994).

In this study, four potato varieties showed that seedlings from buds of different lengths can shorten the sowing period and promote early maturity and harvest compared to those observed with potato tuber seeding (Tables 12 and 13). Among the treatments, T3 and T2 exhibited the best performance, mainly because the bud seedling cultivation process requires a brief period of time to grow seedlings, and the plants are grown in advance (Fang, 2019). Potato plants grow faster at the early stage, and the underground root system develops, resulting in a larger leaf area, robust photosynthesis, more dry matter accumulation, and potential plant growth (Zhou, Wu & Li, 2014). Potato plants can enter the tuber swelling stage before this time, and then the tuber grows and develops in the ground for a long time, resulting in high yield. Furthermore, the temperature is lower at earlier stages of tuber development, which is suitable for tuber growth. A large temperature difference between day and night is conducive to tuber expansion and the movement of stem and leaf assimilates to tubers (Zhang, 2012). Therefore, the yield of potato bud seedling cultivation was significantly higher than that in the tuber seedling treatment.

Under the same management conditions, plant height and leaf number in the potato seedling stage (Tables 3 and 5) were consistent with the standards of a plant height of 5–10 cm and 5–8 leaves in the seedling transplanting method (Wang, 2009). There was no significant difference in yield performance between potatoes from five cm bud seedlings and seven cm bud seedlings, but there was a significant difference compared with three cm bud seedlings, which was positively correlated with the growth and vigor of potato buds (Table 12). At the seedling stage, some buds from the terminal of the potato grew robustly, showing maximum values for plant height, stem diameter and compound leaf number (Table 3). This finding was consistent with the principle of apical dominance in potato, where the yield of terminal buds is higher than that of buds from other positions (Wen & Wang, 1993; Li, 2003). Young leaves of potato plants from terminal buds appear earlier and grow faster, the seedlings grow vigorously, and the yield is significantly increased, which is related to the early growth and development of the plants. The main advantage of the terminal buds is obvious (Wen & Wang, 1993). The leaf number of potatoes generated from middle buds, tail buds and the CK treatment decreases consecutively, the growth potential decreases, the leaf development of plants from young buds is delayed, and the growth rate slows down, consistent with potato tuber bud-breaking propagation (Xiao & Guo, 2007).

At the same time, it was proven that young leaves of potato terminal buds started early and grew faster, seedlings grew vigorously, apical dominance of terminal buds was obvious, and the yield increased significantly. It seems to be related to the growth and development of plants at the early stage, while the number of leaves in the potato middle bud, potato tail bud and control treatments decreased one by one, the growth potential decreased in turn, the leaf spreading time of the young bud became later, and the growth rate slowed down, which is consistent with the bud breaking propagation of potato tuber (Xiao & Guo, 2007).

In the various experimental treatments of potato bud seedling cultivation, the management methods, fertilizer application and water management during the growth period were consistent with those applied in greenhouse cultivation. Therefore, there was no difference in quality between the treatments of various varieties. Nevertheless, there were no differences among the varieties, consistent with potato quality and varietal characteristics. In the current experiment, five cm potato buds were selected for seedling cultivation, with cultivation of seedlings from terminal buds yielding the best result. In short, three potato bud lengths, namely, 3 cm, 5 cm, and 7 cm, were selected according to performance in the potato bud length test. There may be other suitable approaches for potato cultivation involving other bud lengths and positions, which needs to be further investigated. In addition, assessment of other gradients of potato sprout lengths for seedling treatment is required.

Conclusions

In this study, the potato bud planting method was used for the cultivation of seedlings. Potato buds with three different lengths (3 cm, 5 cm, and 7 cm) were considered the T1, T2, and T3 treatments, and terminal buds, middle buds, and tail buds were used as the T4, T5, and T6 treatments. The plant morphological and physiological growth indices were significantly different among the treatments, and the seven cm potato bud length treatment (T3) was proven to be the best treatment for raising seedlings under simulated field conditions. Among all tested treatments, T4 showed excellent growth, followed by T5, T6, and CK, during the seedling stage and all growth stages. There were also significant differences among the treatments of the tested varieties during the determination of yield and commercial potato production rate. Regarding the bud position treatments, terminal buds were shown to be the best treatment because the relative yield and commercial potato yield rates were the highest. In conclusion, we demonstrated that our evaluated bud planting technique should be adopted at the commercial level, which could help achieve enhanced crop production with maximum yield.

Supplemental Information

Raw data

The original data showed the physiological indexes, growth indexes, yield and quality of all processed potatoes in different periods. These index data are used for statistical analysis between each treatment.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13804/supp-1
4 Citations   Views   Downloads