Transcriptome analysis and functional identification of GmMYB46 in soybean seedlings under salt stress
- Published
- Accepted
- Received
- Academic Editor
- Mahmood-ur-Rahman Ansari
- Subject Areas
- Agricultural Science, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
- Keywords
- Soybean, Transcriptome analysis, Salt stress, Differentially expressed genes, GmMYB46
- Copyright
- © 2021 Liu et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2021. Transcriptome analysis and functional identification of GmMYB46 in soybean seedlings under salt stress. PeerJ 9:e12492 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12492
Abstract
Salinity is one of the major abiotic stress that limits crop growth and productivity. We investigated the transcriptomes of salt-treated soybean seedlings versus a control using RNA-seq to better understand the molecular mechanisms of the soybean (Glycine max L.) response to salt stress. Transcriptome analysis revealed 1,235 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under salt stress. Several important pathways and key candidate genes were identified by KEGG enrichment. A total of 116 differentially expressed transcription factors (TFs) were identified, and 17 TFs were found to belong to MYB families. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these TFs may be involved in salt stress adaptation. Further analysis revealed that GmMYB46 was up-regulated by salt and mannitol and was localized in the nucleus. The salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing GmMYB46 was significantly enhanced compared to wild-type (WT). GmMYB46 activates the expression of salt stress response genes (P5CS1, SOD, POD, NCED3) in Arabidopsis under salt stress, indicating that the GmMYB46 protein mediates the salt stress response through complex regulatory mechanisms. This study provides information with which to better understand the molecular mechanism of salt tolerance in soybeans and to genetically improve the crop.
Introduction
Plant growth and development are often affected by unfavorable external stimuli such as drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures. Salt stress may lead to decreased crop yields and it reportedly affects approximately 6% of arable land and 20% of irrigated land (Chen et al., 2021a). Soil salinization affects plant growth differently at each developmental stage, typically through osmotic stress and ion toxicity. Osmotic stress is the primary stressor and immediately affects plant growth when the plant is exposed to high salinity. Ion toxicity occurs later when NaCl concentration has reached a threshold beyond which the ion homeostasis in plants is disrupted (Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink, 2020). High salinity stress inhibits plants’ nutrient uptake, thus inhibiting growth and development (Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink, 2020). Salt stress stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, and hydroxyl radicals. ROS have a strong oxidative capacity and can cause cell plasma membrane damage, metabolic dysfunction, and cell death by disrupting redox homeostasis (Liang et al., 2018).
Plants have evolved many complex molecular and physiological mechanisms to adapt to salinized environments, such as the plant hormone signaling pathway, salt overly sensitive (SOS) signaling pathway, Na+ efflux or sequestration in vacuoles, transcriptional regulation, improvement of antioxidant enzyme activity, and osmolyte (which include proline and soluble sugar) accumulation (Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink, 2020). Protein kinases (PKs) and protein phosphatases (PPs) in plant signal transduction pathways participate in abiotic stress responses through protein dephosphorylation. The PP2C protein family is reportedly important to the salt stress response because they affect plants’ metabolic process, hormone levels, and growth factors (Wang et al., 2020a). In addition, the maintenance of intracellular sodium and potassium homeostasis is essential for the survival of plants under salt stress, and many ion channels, transporters, and antiporters play a role in this process. For example, HKT1 (high-affinity potassium transporter 1) was initially thought to be an Na+/K+ symporter in wheat, and that Na+ was excreted by transpiration to enhance plant salt tolerance (Schachtman & Schroeder, 1994). However, the Arabidopsis AtHKT1 protein selectively transports Na+, affecting its distribution in roots and shoots (Ren et al., 2005). The tonoplast-localized NHX-type Na+/H+ exchangers have been reported to sequestrate Na+ into vacuoles and participate in K+ homeostasis. For example, plasma membrane-localized NHX7/SOS1 flushes excess Na+ through the roots and restricts excessive accumulation, which regulates intracellular ion homeostasis and enhances plant salt tolerance. However, the Arabidopsis sos1 mutant showed more sensitivity to salt stress (Ji et al., 2013; Shi et al., 2002). Nieves-Cordones et al. (2010) found that the high-affinity potassium transporter 5 (HAK5) could promote K+ absorption under high salinity conditions, which was beneficial to maintaining the balance of Na+/K+. However, some HAK family members can regulate Na+ translocation. Wang et al. (2020b) revealed that SlHAK20 transported Na+ and K+ and regulated Na+/K+ balance under salt stress. The mechanism for transcriptional regulation of plant salt tolerance has attracted much attention in the scientific community. Transcription factors (TFs) are considered to be gene switches, which activate or inhibit the expression of downstream stress-related genes by binding to specific cis-acting elements on promoters and forming a complex gene regulatory network to alleviate the damage caused by abiotic stress (Hoang et al., 2017). Many TFs are involved in regulating the response and adaptation of plants to salt stress, including WRKY (Li et al., 2019a), MYB (Du et al., 2018), AP2/ERF (Zhao et al., 2019a), NAC (Li et al., 2021). Plants respond to osmotic stress by accumulating a large number of osmolytes under high salinity conditions, these osmolytes generally include proline, sugar alcohols, sorbitol, and quaternary ammonium compounds (Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink, 2020). Liu et al. (2015) found that the overexpression of AtbHLH112 in Arabidopsis activated the expression of P5CS and inhibited the expressions of the P5CDH and ProDH genes, thus increasing proline synthesis while reducing its degradation. The increased proline content contributes to better abiotic stress tolerance of Arabidopsis.
Soybean (Glycine max L.) is a global staple edible oil and food crop, which also provides the raw material for the manufacture of animal feeds. Salt stress adversely affects the growth of soybean plants, which leads to reduced yields. At present, many key genes related to salt tolerance have been identified in soybeans. The CHX-type ion transport protein GmSALT3 improves the salt tolerance of soybean plants by promoting Na+ and Cl− exclusion (Qu et al., 2021). The salt tolerance of soybean hairy roots and transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing GmCHX20a decreases, promoting the absorption and accumulation of Na+ in roots be due to GmCHX20a, while GmCHX1 (GmSALT3) was shown to protect transgenic Arabidopsis plants via Na+ exclusion under salt treatments (Jia et al., 2021). The expression level of the MYB transcription factor GmMYB84 was up-regulated under salt stress, and the overexpression of GmMYB84 enhanced the salt tolerance of transgenic soybeans (Zhang et al., 2020a). Salt-induced soybean NAC transcription factor, GmSIN1, promoted root growth and enhanced salt tolerance by controlling abscisic acid production and ROS (Li et al., 2019b). However, as there are limited genetic resources to improve soybean genetics these require further study.
Understanding the molecular mechanisms of plant salt tolerance is a prerequisite for the development of salt-tolerant crop varieties, and technological advances can help to clarify the complex mechanisms of plant response to salt stress. Transcriptome analysis is a powerful tool to uncover stress-related regulatory networks in plants. It is widely used to identify stress-responsive genes and genetic control elements. A large number of salt-induced genes have been identified in oilseed rape (Yong et al., 2014), rice (Zhou et al., 2016), watermelon (Song, Joshi & Joshi, 2020a), kenaf (Munsif et al., 2020), and maize (Chen et al., 2021b). Ali et al. (2012) found that soybeans responded to salt stress through abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis based on tag sequence data combined with GO analysis. Zhao et al. (2019a) identified differentially expressed genes through transcriptome analysis, including Glyma.02G228100, Glyma.03G226000, Glyma.03G031000, Glyma.03G031400, Glyma.04G180300, Glyma.04G180400, Glyma.05G204600, Glyma.08G189600, Glyma.13G042200, and Glyma.17G17320, which were considered to be the key genes involved in the salt tolerance mechanism in salt-tolerant soybeans. It is generally believed that plants sense salt stress mainly through their roots, but high salinity may lead to physiological changes such as growth inhibition, leaf wilting, excessive accumulation of ROS in leaves, and increased Na+ content. However, the molecular mechanism of plant shoots (especially leaves) in response to salt stress is not well-established. In this study, the shoot (including stems and leaves) of soybean seedlings was used for transcriptome sequencing (RNA sequencing, RNA-seq), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment combined with other bioinformatics methods were used to identify key pathways and genes induced by salt stress. This study will provide data for the investigation of molecular mechanisms of the salt response in soybeans and cultivation of salt-resistant varieties.
Materials and Methods
Plant growth and salt treatment
Cultivated soybean seeds (Tianlong No. 1) were sterilized with 75% ethanol for 10 min, washed with sterile distilled water, and laid on wet filter paper for two days. The germinated seeds were transferred to quartz sand and irrigated with Hoagland nutrient solution, then cultured in a plant growth chamber (16 h day/8 h night, 25 ± 2 °C, 60–70% relative humidity). After 10 d, soybean seedlings with consistent growth were selected and divided into two groups: seedlings irrigated with Hoagland nutrient solution as control, and those irrigated with Hoagland nutrient solution containing 120 mM NaCl as the treatment. The shoots (stems and leaves) were obtained after being treated for 6 h and were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for transcriptome sequencing. The control group and treatment group each contained three biological replicates.
Phenotypic comparison and physiological measurements
Histochemical staining with NBT (Nitrotetrazolium blue chloride) and DAB (3, 3-Diaminobenzidine) was used to examine the ROS (O2− and H2O2) accumulation levels in the leaves (He et al., 2019). After 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, and 12 h salt treatment, the leaves were removed and immersed in DAB and NBT staining solution. Chlorophyll was removed with alcohol for photography after 12 h at room temperature. After 6 days of salt treatment, plant phenotypes were analyzed and compared, and physiological indexes related to salt stress (including plant height, fresh weight per plant, proline content, Na+, and K+ ion content) were determined as previously reported (Zhang et al., 2020b).
RNA isolation, cDNA library preparation, and Illumina sequencing
The total RNA was isolated from soybean shoot samples using a mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen, AM1561) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The contained DNA was digested with DNase I. The quality and concentration of RNA was detected using Agarose gel electrophoresis and Nanodrop 2000 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA), respectively. The mRNA in the total RNA was enriched using magnetic beads with Oligo (dT), and approximately 4 µg mRNA was collected from each sample for library construction using a TruSeq Stranded mRNA LTSample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The libraries were then sequenced on the Illumina sequencing platform (Illumina HiSeqTM 2500). The raw reads generated in this study were deposited in the NCBI database under accession number PRJNA741583.
Validation by qRT-PCR analysis
The expression of 10 randomly selected genes was evaluated by qRT-PCR analysis to validate the transcriptome data. This selection included 5 up-regulated genes (LOC100807235, LOC100816551, LOC100785783, LOC100787314, LOC100795929) and 5 down-regulated genes (LOC100805378, LOC102663255, LOC100306125, LOC100787705, LOC100819491). qRT-PCR was conducted using Bio-Rad CFX96 PCR System (USA, Bio-Rad) with a 20 µL reaction mixture. The mixture consisted of 10 µL HieffTM qPCR SYBR® Green Master Mix (No Rox Plus) (11201ES, Yeasen, Shanghai, China), 0.5 µL (10 µM) Primer F, 0.5 µL (10 µM) Primer R, and 9 µL (100 ng/µL) diluted cDNA. Relative expression of the genes was analyzed with the 2−ΔΔCt method using the GmEF-1 α gene as an internal control to normalize the level of gene expression (Zhao et al., 2020). The primers for qRT-PCR analysis were designed using the Primer Blast tool on the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). All primers used in this study are shown in Table S1.
RNA-Seq analysis
The transcriptome sequencing was conducted by OE Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Raw reads containing ploy-N and the low-quality reads were filtered to obtain the clean reads using Trimmomatic software (Bolger, Lohse & Usadel, 2014). The clean reads were mapped to the cultivated soybean (Glycine max (Linn.) Merr.) genome (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/5?genome_assembly_id=401179). The Q20, Q30, and GC content from the clean read data were calculated and used to evaluate all samples’ sequencing quality. All further analyses were based on high-quality data from clean reads. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to identify the repeatability of three biological replicates in the same group.
The gene expression levels were normalized to fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM) using Cufflinks v2.2.2 software. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by comparing the read counts of the control and salt-treated samples’ gene transcripts using the DESeq R package function’s estimate size factors and nbinom tests (Anders & Huber, 2010). The p-value < 0.05 and —log2 fold change— > 1 or p-value < 0.01 and —log2 fold change— > 1.5 were set as the threshold for significantly differential expression (Long et al., 2019).
KEGG pathways’ enrichment of DEGs was determined using KOBAS software with FDR < 0.01. All of the genes annotated as transcription factors in DEGs were screened to identify the response of transcription factors to salt stress in soybean shoots.
Phylogenetic analysis of MYB family members
Some members of the MYB families reportedly involved in plant abiotic stress were retrieved from the NCBI database, and phylogenetic analysis was conducted with the corresponding family members in the salt-treated soybeans’ DEGs. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA X (Zhang et al., 2018). The FPKM values of 17 differentially expressed MYBs were used to draw the heatmap using TBtools (v1.0983) (Chen et al., 2020).
Expression pattern and subcellular localization of GmMYB46
Ten-day old soybean seedlings were treated with 120 mM NaCl or 300 mM Mannitol. The leaves were removed at 0, 3, 6, and 12 h, quick-frozen with liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction and detection of GmMYB46 expression pattern using semi-quantitative PCR. The CDS removed the stop codon of GmMYB46, which was cloned and ligated into the pCAMBIA1300-GFP vector to obtain a fusion expression vector GmMYB46:eGFP. This vector was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 before the positive A. tumefaciens was injected into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Plants were cultured for 2 d. The GFP fluorescence was observed and imaged using a laser confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM880 Meta, Jena, Germany).
Salt tolerance analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis
The full-length CDS sequence of GmMYB46 was cloned to construct the overexpressed vector 35S:GmMYB46 and the wild-type Arabidopsis Col-0 was transformed using the floral dip method by Agrobacterium-mediated. The transgenic lines were identified by hygromycin resistance screening and semi-quantitative PCR. The seeds were evenly sown on nutrient-rich soil, kept in the dark at 4 °C for 3 d, and then placed in a growth chamber for 10 d. The control group (CK) was irrigated with deionized water for culturing, and the treatment group (NaCl) was irrigated with 150 mM NaCl solution. The phenotype was observed and photographed after 5 d and 7 d of treatment, and physiological indicators (survival rate, relative water content, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, proline content, SOD, and POD activities) were measured on day seven, following previously reported methods (Chen et al., 2019; He et al., 2019). The leaves were removed for RNA extraction 12 h after salt treatment, qRT-PCR analysis of salt stress-related genes was performed, and AtACTIN2 was used as an internal reference using the same methods as noted above.
Statistical analysis
All data were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (v20.0, NY, USA). Means ± SD are shown in this study (n ≥ 3). The Student’s t-test was used to calculate P-values (P < 0.05) to determine the significance of the differences among treatments.
Results
Salt injury in soybean shoots exposed to high salinity
To observe the effect of salt stress on the growth of soybean shoots, 10-day-old soybean seedlings were selected for salt treatment. NBT and DAB staining results showed that the contents of H2O2 and O2− in leaves were significantly higher than those at 0 h and 3 h after salt treatment for 6 h and 12 h (Fig. 1A), indicating that excessive ROS had been generated and accumulated in plant leaves at 6 h salt treatment. Therefore, the 6 h salt-treated plants were used for transcriptome sequencing. The phenotypic comparison showed that the growth of soybean seedlings after 6 d of salt treatment was significantly inhibited, and plant height and fresh weight were lower than those of the control (CK) (Figs. 1B, 1C, 1D). In addition, the content of Na+ in shoots of salt-treated soybean seedlings increased significantly and K+ decreased compared with CK (Figs. 1E, 1F). Compared with CK, a large amount of proline accumulated in the shoot of the salt-treated soybean (Fig. 1G).
Figure 1: Effects of salt stress on growth and physiological indicators of soybean seedlings.
(A) After salt treatment (0, 3, 6, 12 h), the accumulation of O and H2O2 in leaves was detected by NBT and DAB staining, respectively, (B) phenotypic changes of soybean seedlings after treatment with 100 mM NaCl for 6 days, (C) plant height, (D) fresh weight, (E) Na+ content and (F) K+ content in shoots, and (G) proline content under normal (CK) and salt treatment conditions. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 6), *P < 0.05 (Student’s t test).Transcriptome analyses
RNA-Seq analysis was performed on seedlings treated with 0 mM (CK) and 120 mM NaCl for 6 h. We constructed six libraries from the control and NaCl treatment groups (three biological replicates in each group) for analysis using RNA-Seq. These libraries yielded 50.05 to 58.13 million raw reads, and 48.85 to 56.88 million clean reads (Table 1). The Q30 in each library was greater than 92%, indicating that the quality of the sequencing data could be used for further analysis. Approximately 98% of the clean reads were mapped to the soybean genome. Correlation analysis revealed that the relationships among the three biological replicates in the same group were more closely related (Fig. 2A). The volcano plot showed that 466 genes were up-regulated and 769 genes were down-regulated after salt treatment based on the loose DEGs restrictions (p < 0.05, —Log2 fold change— > 1) (Fig. 2B, Table S2). However, stricter parameters revealed (p < 0.01, —Log2 fold change— > 1.5) 425 DEGs, including 127 up-regulated and 298 down-regulated genes (Table S3). Transcriptome data was verified by qRT-PCR analysis and showed that the fold variation between RNA-seq expression and qRT-PCR analyses were linearly correlated (R2 = 0.8568) (Fig. 2C).
Sample | Raw reads (M) | Clean reads (M) | Q30 (%) | Total reads | Total mapped reads |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK-1 | 50.49 | 49.3 | 93.26 | 49300196 | 48248935 (97.87%) |
CK-2 | 50.05 | 48.85 | 93.52 | 48851760 | 47818910 (97.89%) |
CK-3 | 58.13 | 56.88 | 92.85 | 56884250 | 55613843 (97.77%) |
NaCl-1 | 52.01 | 50.88 | 93.04 | 50878700 | 49752466 (97.79%) |
NaCl-2 | 50.2 | 49.11 | 93.02 | 49105610 | 48029838 (97.81%) |
NaCl-3 | 56.17 | 54.94 | 92.89 | 54943854 | 53713686 (97.76%) |
Total | 317.05 | 309.96 |
Figure 2: RNA-seq analysis of soybean shoots under salt stress.
(A) Correlation analysis of control (CK) and salt-treated samples (NaCl), (B) volcano plot of DEGs. Red dots indicate up-regulated genes and blue dots indicate down-regulated genes. (C) Correlations in qRT-PCR (x-axis) RNA-seq data (y-axis) using 10 randomly selected DEGs.KEGG enrichment analysis of up- and down-regulated DEGs was conducted using the KOBAS database. The top 20 most highly enriched pathways were displayed (Fig. 3). The up-regulated DEGs induced by salt treatment were significantly enriched in ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’ (34), ‘Phenylalanine metabolism’ (4), ‘Fructose and mannose metabolism’ (6), ‘Carotenoid biosynthesis’ (4), and ‘MAPK signaling pathway’ (8) (Fig. 3A). The down-regulated DEGs were significantly enriched in ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’ (25), ‘Ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes’ (9), ‘MAPK signaling pathway’ (13), ‘Plant-pathogen interaction’ (15), and ‘Arginine and proline metabolism’ (6) (Fig. 3B).
Figure 3: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis of DEGs in response to salt stress using the top twenty significant enrichment KEGG terms.
(A) KEGG terms enriched by up-regulated DEGs, (B) KEGG terms enriched by down-regulated DEGs.Key genes in early response to salt stress
The up- and down-regulated DEGs can be divided into the following five categories in the KEGG database: Cellular Processes, Environmental Information Processing, Genetic Information Processing, Metabolism, and Organismal Systems. Among them, the number of up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs is the largest in signal transduction categories, which belong to Environmental Information Processing, and include 34 and 29 genes, respectively (Table 2). The 34 up-regulated genes contain hormone-related proteins and PP2C family members, while down-regulated genes mainly include the ABA-related genes and probable xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase protein family members (Table S4). Environmental adaptation categories include four up-regulated genes and 15 down-regulated genes (Table 2, Table S5). Furthermore, seven genes from the ABA receptors PYL family enriched in both the plant hormone signal transduction pathway and the MAPK signaling pathway were significantly down-regulated, including LOC100788576, LOC100819216, LOC100804400, LOC100805378, LOC100792229, LOC100798803, and LOC100788199 (Figs. 4A, 4E). The PP2C (Phosphatase 2C) family genes downstream of PYL were significantly up-regulated and include LOC100793293, LOC100803764, LOC100807235, LOC100818568, LOC100776356, LOC100796161, and LOC100781388 (Figs. 4B, 4F). The expression levels of ABF family members downstream of SNF1-related protein kinase 2 (SNRK2), LOC100819313 and GmbZIP1, were significantly up-regulated (Fig. 4A). Proline dehydrogenase genes (PDH, LOC100797464, and LOC100799876) in the arginine and proline metabolic pathways were significantly down-regulated (Figs. 4C, 4G) The phenylalanine ammonia-lyase genes (GmPAL1.2, GmPAL1.3, GmPAL2.2, and GmPAL2.4) in the phenylalanine metabolism pathway were significantly up-regulated to promote the production of cinnamic acid (Figs. 4D, 4H), which is important for salt stress adaptation.
KEGG categories | Number of UR | Number of DR |
---|---|---|
Cellular Processes | ||
Transport and catabolism | 1 | 10 |
Environmental Information Processing | ||
Signal transduction | 34 | 29 |
Membrane transport | 1 | 0 |
Genetic Information Processing | ||
Translation | 1 | 14 |
Folding, sorting and degradation | 5 | 9 |
Transcription | 0 | 5 |
Replication and repair | 0 | 3 |
Metabolism | ||
Nucleotide metabolism | 3 | 3 |
Metabolism of terpenoids and Polyketides | 7 | 11 |
Metabolism of other amino acids | 2 | 8 |
Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins | 2 | 4 |
Lipid metabolism | 10 | 19 |
Energy metabolism | 4 | 3 |
Carbohydrate metabolism | 28 | 20 |
Biosynthesis of other secondary Metabolites | 12 | 13 |
Amino acid metabolism | 16 | 16 |
Organismal Systems | ||
Environmental adaptation | 4 | 15 |
Figure 4: Key KEGG pathways of related genes in response to salt stress and salt-induced expression patterns.
(A) Plant hormone signal transduction, (B) MAPK signaling pathway, (C) arginine and proline metabolism, (D) phenylalanine metabolism, and (E–H) PYR/PYLs, PP2Cs, proline dehydrogenase genes, and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene expression represented using the FPKM value.Transcription factors (TFs) involved in salt stress
The differentially expressed TFs in DEGs were statistically analyzed, as shown in Fig. 5. We found that 1,235 DEGs contained a total of 116 transcription factor coding genes, accounting for 9.4% of DEGs. Of these, 49 were up-regulated and 67 were down-regulated. There were a large number of AP2/ERF, MYB, and bHLH families with 32, 17, and 14 differentially expressed TFs, respectively. Further analysis showed that the MYB family had the most members (11) in the up-regulated TFs, while the AP2/ERF family had the most members (26) in the down-regulated TFs. We searched MYB proteins that were reportedly involved in plant abiotic stress and conducted the phylogenetic analysis with MYB members in soybean DEGs. As shown in Fig. 6A, the up-regulated LOC778071 and SlMYB102 (Solyc02g079280) (Zhang et al., 2020c) were highly homologous and in the same clade; LOC100799410, MdMYB46 (XP_008363629) (Chen et al., 2019), and TaMYB86B (KM066946) (Song, Joshi & Joshi, 2020a) were in the same clade, and LOC100805341 and OsMYB2 (AK120551) (Yang, Dai & Zhang, 2012) were in the same clade. Further analysis showed that the expression level of LOC100799410 was the most up-regulated by salt stress (fold change = 7.49) (Fig. 6B). Therefore, for further functional exploration LOC100799410 was named GmMYB46 according to the results of phylogenetic analysis.
Figure 5: Differentially expressed TFs induced by salt stress in soybean.
(A) The classification and number of differentially expressed TFs, (B) classification of up-regulated and down-regulated TFs.Figure 6: Phylogenetic analysis of differentially expressed MYB TFs, and expression pattern and subcellular localization of GmMYB46.
(A) The phylogenetic tree of differentially expressed MYBs and other reported MYBs involved in abiotic stress, (B) heatmap diagrams showing the relative expression levels of differentially expressed MYBs based on the FPKM values, (C) expression analysis of GmMYB46 induced by NaCl and mannitol, (D) subcellular localization of GmMYB46 in tobacco leaves.GmMYB46 was up-regulated by salt treatment and localized in the nucleus
Semi-quantitative PCR analysis showed that the expression level of GmMYB46 was significantly increased in leaves treated with salt for 6 and 12 h, while the expression of GmMYB46 first increased (6 h) and then decreased (12 h) under mannitol treatment (Fig. 6C). In addition, the GFP fusion vector GmMYB46:eGFP was constructed and the transient expression was carried out in tobacco leaves. The results showed that green fluorescence was only observed in the nucleus of cells of GmMYB46:eGFP transformed leaves, indicating that GmMYB46 protein was localized in the nucleus (Fig. 6D).
Overexpression of GmMYB46 enhances the salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis
An overexpression vector (35S:GmMYB46) was constructed to explore the function of GmMYB46 in plant salt tolerance, and transgenic Arabidopsis lines (OX46.1, OX46.2) were obtained (Figs. S1A, S1B). Phenotypic analysis showed that the growth of Arabidopsis seedlings was significantly inhibited by 150 mM NaCl treatment for 5 d and 7 d, but OX46.1 and OX46.2 plants were less affected by salt than WT (Col-0) (Fig. 7A). The survival rates of OX46.1 and OX46.2 were significantly higher than those of the WT after 5 and 7 d of salt treatment (Fig. 7B). In addition, the relative water content of OX46.1 and OX46.2 plants was significantly higher than that of WT (Fig. 7C), while the MDA content was significantly lower than that of WT under salt stress (Fig. 7D). The proline content and the activities of SOD and POD increased significantly, while the overexpressed lines were significantly higher than that of WT (Figs. 7E, 7F). In addition, we examined the expression of salt stress-related genes in normal and salt-treated Arabidopsis. The results showed that the expression level of P5CS1, a key gene for proline synthesis, was significantly up-regulated in Col-0, OX46.1, and OX46.2 plants induced by salt, and it was significantly higher in overexpressed lines than in WT (Fig. 8A). Antioxidant enzyme synthesis-related genes SOD, POD, and NCED3, a key gene for ABA biosynthesis, also showed a salt-induced expression pattern similar to P5CS1 (Figs. 8B, 8C, 8D).
Figure 7: Overexpression of GmMYB46 enhanced the salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis.
(A) Phenotypic analysis of wide-type (Col-0) and overexpressed lines (OX46.1 and OX46.2), (B) survival rate of Arabidopsis seedlings, (C) relative water content, (D) MDA content, (E) proline content, and (F) enzyme activities of SOD and POD. The data represent the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 (Student’s t test).Figure 8: Expression patterns of stress-responsive genes in Col-0 and overexpressed lines (OX46.1 and OX46.2) in response to salt stress.
The expression of (A) P5CS1, (B) SOD, (C) POD, and (D) NCED3 genes.Discussion
Salt stress is one of the major environmental factors limiting plant growth and productivity. Plants have evolved complex physiological, biochemical, and molecular regulatory mechanisms to adapt to adverse conditions. These involve the expression changes of a large number of regulatory genes. Transcriptome sequencing is an effective tool for comprehensive analysis at the transcriptional level for plants under abiotic stress (Zhang et al., 2020b). There have been many studies on the transcriptome analysis of legumes using RNA-seq, including medicago (Shu et al., 2018), glycine (Sun et al., 2016), common bean (Hiz et al., 2014), and Arachis hypogaea (Zhang et al., 2020b). Sun et al. (2016) performed small RNA transcriptome analysis on root tip tissues of normal and salt-treated soybean seedlings and identified 66 salt-responsive miRNAs, and then demonstrated that salt-induced miR399 played an important role in regulating the developmental plasticity of soybean roots. Plant roots are known to directly encounter salinized soil as the first line of defense; accordingly, most studies have focused on the molecular regulatory mechanisms of the root response to salt stress (Zhang et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2020). However, these molecular mechanisms and regulatory networks have not been studied in plant shoots when growth is inhibited due to salt stress. Zeng et al. (2019) performed transcriptome sequencing on salt-treated soybean leaves, however only eight genes were preliminarily identified, and the function of these genes has not been explored in plants in their report. In contrast to previous work, shoot tissues (including stems and leaves) of salt-treated soybean seedlings were used for transcriptome sequencing in this study, which may better reflect the response of the above-ground parts of soybeans to salt stress. More importantly, transcriptome and bioinformatics analysis combined with Arabidopsis genetic transformation technique were used to preliminarily demonstrate the function of GmMYB46 in response to salt stress in our work.
We identified some important pathways and key candidate genes that may be involved in the salt stress response among 1,235 DEGs. Wu et al. (2017) conducted KEGG enrichment analysis of salt-induced DEGs and found ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’, ‘MAPK signaling pathway’, ‘Arginine and proline metabolism’ and other secondary metabolite pathways were significantly enriched. Tian et al. (2018) used KEGG analysis to determine that ‘Plant hormone signal transduction pathway’ was significantly enriched in both salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant Rosa chinensis. Similarly, our analysis found that DEGs were significantly enriched in ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’, ‘MAPK signaling pathway’, ‘Phenylalanine metabolism’, ‘Arginine and proline Metabolism’ pathways (Fig. 3). These pathways play an important role in the process of plant salt stress response and the results provide a reference for salt tolerance genes in soybeans and assist in analyzing molecular regulatory mechanisms.
ABA is one of the most important salt stress hormones. It plays a crucial role in salt stress defense. ABA is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress, ion homeostasis, and the scavenging of reactive oxygen species induced by salt injury (Yu et al., 2020). It is widely believed that PYR/PYL protein, PP2Cs, and SnRK2 kinase constitute the core module of ABA signaling (PYL-PP2CS-SnRK2s), which is responsible for the earliest ABA signal recognition and transduction in plants (Gong et al., 2020). Liu et al. (2012) showed that overexpression of AtPP2CG1 enhanced the salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis by activating the expression of salt stress response genes RD29A, RD29B, DREB2A, and KIN1. In this study, we found that the ABA receptor PYL family genes significantly enriched in ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’ and ‘MAPK signaling pathway’ were significantly down-regulated, while PP2C family members were significantly up-regulated. Two downstream ABF family genes (LOC100819313 and GmbZIP1) were also significantly up-regulated (Fig. 4). Lei et al. (2021) conducted transcriptome sequencing of salt-treated Ricinus communis L. and found that PP2C genes were up-regulated in salt-treated cultivated R. communis, which inhibited the activity of SnRK2 kinase and further promoted the up-regulation of downstream ABF genes. The results in this work are consistent with previous reports, further confirming the function of the ABA signaling pathway PYL-PP2CS-SnRK2s in short-term salt stress. In addition, previous reports have shown that proline metabolism is an important pathway in response to oxidative stress caused by salt injury, and that the accumulation of proline is protective for plants (Verbruggen & Hermans, 2008). In this study, three key genes of the proline degradation pathway (PDH, LOC100797464, LOC100799876) were significantly down-regulated (Fig. 4), which reduce the degradation of proline in shoots and increase its accumulation in response to salt stress. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) is a key enzyme in the phenylalanine pathway that catalyzes the deamination of phenylalanine to produce cinnamic acid. Some PAL genes (Aradu.IU1HH, Araip. 69J63, Araip.GM19P, and Araip.V9S7Z) in peanuts were significantly up-regulated under salt stress (Wanner et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 2020b). Singh, Singh & Singh (2013) showed that cinnamic acid could reduce the accumulation of ROS in maize plants by providing ROS-scavenging enzymes under salt stress. We found that the expression levels of PAL family genes (GmPAL1.2, GmPAL1.3, GmPAL2.2, GmPAL2.4) were also significantly up-regulated in salt-treated soybeans (Fig. 4), indicating that these genes were involved in the response to salt stress. However, the means by which these genes exert their regulatory functions requires further study.
TFs are key regulatory factors in the complex signal network of plants in response to abiotic stress. The function of several TFs in the regulation of salt stress in plants has been reported, including that of AP2/ERF, MYB, bHLH, WRKY, and C2H2 (Ciftci-Yilmaz et al., 2007; Li et al., 2019a; Liu et al., 2015; Makhloufi et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2019b). In this study, 116 TFs were found in the differential genes by RNA-seq, accounting for 9.4% of the DEGs. These TFs were distributed among different families, including AP2/ERF, bZIP, NAC, MYB, BHLH, C3H, C2H2, HD-ZIP, and WRKY, etc. The AP2/ERF family has the largest number of members (32), followed by MYB (17) and bHLH (14) (Fig. 5). This is consistent with transcriptome analysis results from other species undergoing salt treatment. Long et al. (2019) found that the number of the AP2/ERF family members was largest among the DEGs treated with salt, accounting for 17.6%. Further analysis showed that MYB had the most members (11) in the up-regulated TFs (Fig. 5). Munsif et al. (2020) also found that the MYB family has the largest amount of up-regulated differentially expressed TFs in salt-treated isonuclear kenaf. Zhang et al. (2020c) showed that overexpression of SlMYB102 enhanced salt tolerance of transgenic tomatoes by regulating a series of molecular and physiological processes. OsMYB2-overexpressing transgenic rice plants were more tolerant than wild-type to salt stress (Yang, Dai & Zhang, 2012). Chen et al. (2019) showed that MdMYB46 can enhance the salt tolerance of apples by activating stress-related genes (MdABRE1A, MdDREB2a, MdRD22, and MdRD29A). TaMYB86B affects wheat’s salt tolerance by regulating ion homeostasis, maintaining osmotic balance, and reducing ROS levels (Song et al., 2020b). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that GmMYB46 (LOC100799410), MdMYB46, and TaMYB86B were highly homologous in the same clade (Fig. 6A). Analysis also showed that the expression level of the GmMYB46 gene was the highest up-regulated expression among all differentially expressed MYBs (Fig. 6B). Therefore, we believe that it is worth exploring the function of GmMYB46 under salt stress.
Further analysis revealed that the expression level of GmMYB46 first increased and then decreased under the treatment of mannitol compared with salt treatment (Fig. 6C). Plants first go through a rapid osmotic stress phase when exposed to salt in the environment before experiencing ion toxicity caused by salt stress (Zhao et al., 2019a). Mannitol treatment led to osmotic stress. The expression pattern of GmMYB46 suggesting that it may function in the early response to osmotic stress, and its longer response time to salt treatment indicated that it may play an important role in salt stress. The salt tolerance of Arabidopsis overexpressing GmMYB46 is significantly enhanced at 5 d and 7 d after salt treatment (Fig. 7). These results implied that GmMYB46 plays an important role in both short-term salt response and long-term salt stress tolerance. Chen et al. (2019) reported similar results and found that a short-term salt responsive gene, MdMYB46, in apples plays an important role in enhancing the long-term salt stress tolerance of transgenic apples. MDA content, as a product of membrane lipid peroxidation, reflects the degree of damage of plant cells due to abiotic stress, including salt stress (Song et al., 2019). We found that the MDA content of overexpressed lines under salt stress was significantly lower than that of WT (Fig. 7). The enhanced activity of SOD and POD helps plants reduce oxidative damage (Zhang et al., 2020d) and the proline content may reflect the stress resistance of plants. We found that the activity of SOD and POD, and the content of proline were significantly increased in overexpression lines compared with WT under salt stress (Fig. 7). In addition, the key genes for proline biosynthesis P5CS1 (Liu et al., 2015), and antioxidant enzymes SOD and POD encoding genes, were significantly up-regulated in the overexpression lines after salt treatment compared with WT (Fig. 8). NCED3, as a key gene in ABA synthesis (Van Zelm, Zhang & Testerink, 2020), was significantly upregulated under salt treatment, and the upregulated ratio in the overexpressed line was significantly higher than that in WT. These results further suggest that the regulation of GmMYB46 in the salt stress response is complex, and the detailed molecular regulatory mechanism requires additional study.
Conclusions
The shoots of control and salt-treated soybean seedlings were used for transcriptome sequencing to analyze their molecular mechanisms in response to salt stress. Transcriptome analysis revealed a total of 1,235 DEGs, of which 466 genes were up-regulated and 769 genes were down-regulated. The DEGs involved in important pathways were determined by KEGG enrichment, which included ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’, ‘MAPK signaling pathway’, ‘Arginine and proline metabolism’, and ‘Phenylalanine metabolism’. We further analyzed the DEGs in these pathways to characterize their possible functions in responses to salt stress as well as TFs related to salt stress responses. The phylogenetic trees of differentially expressed MYBs induced by salt stress were constructed. The salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing GmMYB46 was significantly enhanced, and GmMYB46 was found to activate the expression of salt stress response genes (P5CS1, SOD, POD, NCED3) in Arabidopsis under salt stress. This work will provide a basis for future studies to discover novel salt-tolerance genes, further investigate the molecular mechanism of salt tolerance in soybeans, and cultivate strong salt resistant varieties.
Supplemental Information
Screening and identification of transgenic Arabidopsis
(A) Schematic diagram of overexpression vector construction and selection of hygromycin-resistant plants. (B) Expression identification of GmMYB46 in WT and overexpression lines.